Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
A meeting of two of the most destructive minds in our lifetime. The thing is, I can't tell who's worse.
I met her 2 years ago now and she dropped her handbag. Yup.
Maybe you should read the article again. If there is any issue, it's nothing more than "Sarah Palin may, at some point, come to the UK... for some reason".
It is barely news.
Well looks like it's tough shit for you then, because I would also like to know what issue you're referring to.
what's it to ya?
I dunno, why are you demanding someone address an issue that doesn't exist?
I'm guessing prior Butthurt is behind your unprovoked personal attacks; not to mention your insistence that this is in some way, a 'battle'.
I make no apology for deliberately insulting someone who has gone so far out of his way to foster a hateful personality, if you can call it that.
I see. You're one of those In A Hole: Keep Digging types. That's cool.
So are you going to enlighten me on this issue or not?
see what post I replied to? that's a deflection in my book, par for the course whenever ole Fish Lips meets a difficult issue, or a reply to one of his absurd thread he doesnt like, or can't deal with.
I can see you think it's a deflection.
However, you were asked what the issue it was deflecting from was over three hours ago. Instead of answering, you reply with personal attacks. That looks like a deflection.
Furthermore, the only instance of a hateful personality I can see in this thread is yours. It doesn't put any of your other claims in a good light.
However in the general hate stakes the current score is:
Gorkys - 1
Miming Nemo - 1,000,000
That's if anyone can trust your judgement - which on the basis of this thread, is obviously impaired.
Answer the question.
generally being anything he refuses to discuss rationally, backing out of the thread when runs into a tough crowd. Specifically in this case refusing to even enter a discussion about Palin/Thatcher because he knows he's on shaky ground to start with.
This belief of mine is based on observing his long and in-distinguished history of tossing a metaphorical turd into the swimming pool then citing the troll defence when people get fucked off.
I can guess at why you're so desperate to take me down, or get some more "this"s for your collection, and that's fine. Some people don't like me, I don't like some people, that's life, go on wid your bad self.
But sticking up for this tool - who by his own admission is just a troll for the Tories - is a waste of time.
"Miming Nemo" was pretty good you've got to admit.
I am wrong (sort of).
But I wouldn't say I'd failed trolling exactly, (and you should know) I've managed to suck out the longest response you've ever written on here.
Sorry, I missed your explanation of the specific issue raised in the news report that we were apparently invited to discuss. It was covered up by your attempts to deflect the discussion into an examination of CG's personality and prior conduct.
I'm not really interested in that stuff however, and regardless of how expedient you might find it to ascribe ulterior motives to people who disagree with you - my only interest at this point is: What exactly was the issue were you alleging CG was avoiding?
I might also add: Exactly what is the nature of the discussion that was supposed to have been inspired by a report basically informing us that at some point Sarah Palin intends to travel to the UK to get her photo taken with Maggie?
Which deep constitutional issue does that news provoke examination of? Dying to know.
but you do Margaret T a disservice by lumping her in with that snowbilly.
He's clearly wasting his time in South Carolina. We should bring him over here to run for parliament in the next election.