Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
they are all fucking mugs, right?
typical cunty passive aggressive racist, scared to death by what she reads.
can't believe how much i've agreed with richard.
because i've met far too many of those people
The largest amount of drivel came from that Andrew Roberts historian guy.
Lab/Con peeps as useless and self-contradictory as ever.
Madeley exhibited bloodlust and other assorted guff.
Smug liberal fucktards spouting soundbites and getting themselves a nice hearty round of applause. Silly historian with a right-wing bent making a total pig's ear of the numerous reasons justifying an invasion of Iraq. When Richard fucking Madeley is making the most sense on the panel, you know it's not going to be the year's strongest Question Time.
"Mr Bush's oil interests..."
No, they are *our* oil interests, you bearded sir. What the hell is wrong with taking one of the world's largest supplies of oil out of the grubby, filthy hands of a psychopathic crime family, anyway?
"Lack of contingency planning..."
This was, indeed, dismaying. We should have planned for and dealt with quickly the sheer amount of sectarian warfare, tribalism, virulent blood feuds, Jihadist evil and general mayhem a (disconcertingly large) minority of Iraqis unleashed in the wake of our liberation. Thanks to these opportunistic scumbags, the stabilization of Iraq was set back by years - possibly decades - and led to the brutal slaughter of thousands of our Iraqi brothers and sisters. For sure, heads should (proverbially) roll for this. Animals will be animals; we should have put those wild dogs down before they had the chance to piss in the font, so to speak. We failed the good people of Iraq on this count.
The liberal bird is on the money when it comes to tax breaks for married couples, however.
Man enters The Rabbit's lair, man has his fucking soul eaten by The Rabbit. Would that I could, I would shoot you in the jaw, right the fuck in the jaw, were you ever to enter my place of residence without prior authorization. I'd probably play around with your entrails for good measure.
Of course not. It's a symbol of repression/oppression, sure, but what're you going to do?
It's the woman's choice *some of the time*, I know. This doesn't validate it's use, however.
would also be a repressive, misogynistic gesture aimed at the women who choose to wear it.
i think there was a case maybe a year ago where a teacher was wanting to wear it to teach? I think i do I have a problem with that.
(Not Madeley the other one)
Historian & utter, utter chump.
He was a dick though.
I liked how Dimbleby kept asking the Tory woman to explain exactly HOW the Tories would improve legislation and amend laws.
The best answer he got out of her in the entire hour period was that she'd amend the Act which allows home owners to protect their family from saying you can use 'reasonable' force to something like 'acceptable' force.
What a douche.