Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
the first few seconds will hook you in. This guy is brilliant.
Five seconds in, had this thought: I am not listening to this voice talk shit about something I already know is crap for 90 minutes.
Also: If your film review is longer than the film itself, that means you secretly like it.
YOU'D KEEP MORE GIRLFRIENDS THAT WA-
I particularly like the bit when he goes into his cellar. Reminds me of summer.
It is an amazing cinematic critique and far better than the actual movie.
I watched the first part and it got a bit tiresome.
Okay, we get it: The Phantom Menace is a bad film and George Lucas pissed all over your childhood heroes when he made it and its brethren.
But it shouldn't take you 70 mins to make this point unless you, like him, have let your ego fail your editing and can't bear to cut things down a little.
Moreover not matter how bad it is, a large part of that 'bad' comes from expectation. The films Tomb Raider and Van Helsing both have central characters that fit the requirements laid out in this critique and yet neither is any better than The Phantom Menace. In fact at least the Phantom Menace has some genuinely great action set pieces, something neither of these films achieve.
In short, suck it up.
But it was just too much to bother with for all 70 mins.
It's better than anything you have or will ever do.
Normally people blether on about how, "You do better, then," if you critique something they love by implying how it could be better, but here I am critiquing criticism of just that sort and you still manage to find a way to look like a complete and total clunge telling me not to.
brightonb must eat you for breakfast...
I have to agree with GB: The first time I saw Episode 1, it didn't strike me as any more retarded than the previous films were. More importantly, it was in no way, shape or form a film worthy of 70 entire minutes of discussion. Or indeed, a film with enough to discuss to warrant it. I suspect therefore that this review consists of irrelevent digressions, overly long gags and just plain waffle.
I'm just sorry that fucking voice is too annoying for me to make this anything more than an educated guess.