Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
I find it EVVVVVERAYYYYY NIGHT
BOOOM CHICKA WOW WOW
If, like it says, it's a figment of my imagination then I have one hell of an imagination
one part of your insidey parts is more sensitive to cock poking than others. Just aim upwards a bit.
Also, the identical twin "study" sounds highly spurious. Loving the ingenious use of identical twins in the context of a sex trial though, stock bingewank material.
you've misunderstood the findings of this research. It doesn't posit that no women have a particularly erogenous zone inside their vagina, but rather that the g-spot does not exist as piece of standard anatomical kit.
Uh, then you may have one hell of an imagination.
Personally, I hope it does exist. Otherwise I've been wasting a lot of time introducing complex piano technique to an area that has no need of it.
oh god i'm crying....
...is this a policy you're advocating?
"But sexologist Beverley Whipple who helped popularise the G-spot idea said the work was "flawed".
"She said the researchers had discounted the experiences of lesbian or bisexual women and failed to consider the effects of having different sexual partners with different love-making techniques."
This is a potentially interesting new line of inquiry: When did lesbians become biologically different to heterosexual women?
Just after Chernobyl. Coincidence.
'i've had some hot dirty sex' thread
you need to have a long hard chat with your cock
I just wanted to show how you've had SO MUCH SEX by adding the extra words in.
yes that's right....their collective arses.
The two are very distinct. One is an extremist group, who are wankers (from what i've seen) the other is a group of people following the Islam tradition, not in this extremist group (I haven't met them all so can't say if they're nice people or not, but the ones I have have been lovely).
is what the ladies call my penis
Douchebag's Sex Thread Joke (2010-2010) RIP.
"It's fine to go looking for the G-spot but do not worry if you don't find it."
I'm going to go looking for it right now.
and scientists say the lack of similarity in identical twins means it's not genetic (i think?)
does that mean a woman can be conditioned to have a certain g-spot?
i sense an exciting new area of psychology/hypnotherapy
It already has a name!!
Fuck the Higgs, he's looking for the G.
but I've never given much thought to the G-spot personally. And as everyone here who witnessed the Championships knows, I'm the King of Intercourse.
I don't get why people are so opposed to the notion that the g-spot, insofar as what the g-spot is commonly thought to be, may or does not exist. There has never been any evidence to support the notion that it does. Doesn't mean that certain people can't be more sensitive than others in certain areas, or that women (regardless of whether or not they are particularly sensitive anyway) can't or shouldn't enjoy sex.
Not necessarily the case here, but I've seen other articles where this has became a real gender war issue and I can only see it's because people are getting reactionary and upset by what they think the research imples and suggests, rather than what it actually says.
and favoured erogenous zones. All this study says is that there is no biological or genetic evidence to support the notion that the g-spot exists as a specific and shared piece of physical anatomy, like an arm or earlobe. That seems perfectly reasonable to me. Anyway, home time!
What the article or research might be saying is that 'the g-spot AS WE DEFINE IT doesn't exist'.
But the problem, for me, is that there's this very particular area that yields a very particular response in many people that is generally known as the g-spot. To state that this 'doesn't appear to exist' in the headline, and to then go on to suggest it 'may be a figment of women's imagination' just seems a little bit crazy and wrong.
I'm stuck at E!
A-spot - back of the knee
B-spot - index finger, right hand
C-spot - incisor
D-spot - behind the door
E to G spots - fucked if I know
E-spot - Malta
I'm good to go! Just a little to the right! Just a little further up!
No, not quite! One centimetre to the left!
I'm sure the g-spot is responsible for many such conversations. The best thing about the idea is that it dispells women can cum just with some thrusting in the general region. How come no-one talks about clitoral stimulation? From conversations, I have heard of men (in their twenties, admittedly) being totally freaked out when their girlfriend can only cum through wanking herself off during sex.
or maybe they just HOPE it isn't really true, and the power of their cock will induce orgasm by itself (obvs. it helps).
Once I was told by a friend that her boyfriend actually lost his erection after she came from wanking herself off, whereas other times he'd been absolutely fine. I dunno, maybe he was virginal or she had a really ugly cum face.
Most people just look hilarious/scary.
it's the singularly most nonsensical thing ever, that once you've got someone to *that* point, they happen to look ridiculous and not very sexy. Obviously, it has to be seen at least once, with each new partner, but yeah, nostril-flaring, upper lip twitching, groaning - generally not at all hott.
there are light switches, sheets, paper bags and eyelids. Someone should start a blog of cumfaces, although this probably already exists.
1) I Just Put A Baby In Y'allz Mom
2) Mega Romeo
3) Intensity Nurse (great name for a band)
5) Police TraXXX: 10 Hottest Ways to Inform the Family of the Deceased
They get on my nerves.
obviously most women would like to have both (unless they are strange) but most women (around 80% if that statistic is true) can only have one - which is strangely unacknowledged.
but which is always more than enough to send the woman into a thundering orgasm.
Cunnilingus doesn't happen in films. I think the reason sex scenes are usually so poor is not because they're embarrassing - although they usually are - but because they're weirdly inaccurate.
Sometimes I think about how many poor couples have been led astray by Hollywood 'implied cunnilingus' where the woman heads off down the frame and the man reacts orgasmically to what could only be a rigorous sucking off of his belly button. Sad times.
it's why sometimes it's better to sleep with someone with a small willy rather than someone with a massive willy.
Get ready for the best 10 seconds of your life.
it make me want to throw up, kill myself, and hi-five him all at the same time.
then there should be no fear left in this thread about hitting the saddest point. Your abandon reply is no good here.
Still, good to start 2010 as you mean to go on
winky but truthful smile
They were probably too busy baking pies
I mean, everything else is secondary to a good pie.
"The Gräfenberg Spot, or G-Spot, was named in honour of the German gynaecologist Ernst Gräfenberg who described it over 50 years ago and is said to sit in the front wall of the vagina some 2-5cm up."
That definitely exists and isn't really hard to find.
It reads like Dr Speccy Labcoat just asked a thousand twins "Hi love, do you have a G Spot" and got kneed in the balls 875 times.
you're putting the good doctor directly inside a vagina, sitting by the wall.
It just made me giggle for about 10 mins.
Oh, and good work with the blatent, "I'm brilliant in bed" post.
I'm a fumbling hairy shambles of a man.
It isn't really hard to find unless you're looking for it in a woman that doesn't have one, or has something that matches all its characteristics but does nothing.
This is why the guy used twins instead of the usual unemployed artcore lesbians that usually respond to surveys like this.
whereas you allude to agreement that it does exist in at least some women
is a highly sensitive erogenous zone.
They're saying that this isn't due to a specific physical feature, and that this zone isn't there for all women, that's all.
I don't think these researchers are suggesting that many women don't find a particular area inside their bejingles to be highly sensitive and pleasurable to have touched. They're suggesting that the g-spot, and the g-spot meaning a piece of anatomy that is present in the female of the species, doesn't exist as Ernst Gräfenberg described it.
If you're just using g-spot to describe an individual's particular body part that gets them off, it's a different matter.
*Beverley Whipple, Sexologist
I thought it was just "touch this bit and it's best", like when you tickle a puppy under the chin.
Clearly I don't get it. Sorry.
some women don't have a particularly sensitive g-spot (if at all) and yet the existance of it in culture would prove some women do.
some women in more senstive than others shocker.
sorry, who didn't know this?
some some some
hope this helps.
"where's that then? hur hur hur"
and then the rest of Castle Cabs join in