Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
because i understand it's harder to read and digest information after a lobotomy
"We were wondering by way of explanation and as you seem to portray yourself as a bitter and unfulfilled man, were you much teased by your school chums in the schoolyard and called "Creepy Crawley?""
Any man who's uptight enough to write a 750-word response to a 450-word bad review ought to steer clear of calling others "bitter and unfulfilled".
"you managed to use many of the same ones that have been used so many times before, and still they make me smile at their continued lack of imagination. "Small man...shudder...warbly tenor...mawkish balladeer...cringe factor…squeaky clean...snigger...cheesy…etc..""
And yet, De Burgh refuses to address these concerns. Such arrogance...
this De Burgh fella is clever
while I sent pestilence and disease fleeing from this world'
To be fair, the only thing worse than Chris de Burgh is a bitter theatre reviewer, so I am actually in his corner here. And if an audience is reacting positively to something, however loathesome you personally think it is, it should probably be noted in the summary somewhere.
When he joined the series winner who was doing ladyboy in red.