Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

I'm all for equality and all but isn't this basically lying for the sake of appearing "right thinking"?

theguywithnousername [Edit] [Delete] 10:02, 31 August '09

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8225158.stm

Don't get me wrong - I absolutely believe that same-sex couple should have the same rights as heterosexual couples and believe two women, or two men, could raise a child as well as a mixed-sex couple can. But I also believe a birth certificate should be an accurate document of a child's biological origin. Surely claiming on a birth certificate a child has two mothers, no matter how nice an idea in theory, basically turns the birth certificate into an inaccurate, and indeed biologically-impossible, document displaying a biological origin that did not and could not happen. And surely it's wrong for a legal document, which for some children will be massively important in years to come if they do want/need* to trace their biological roots, to be officially falsified is somehow very wrong?

This might be a bit heavy for 9 o'clock on a bank holiday Monday. I might bump it in work tomorrow.

*say for medical reasons related to hereditary diseases


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND