Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
I'm so happy this debate came in my lifetime.
Unfortunately it's not really that interesting.
"The Twitter Batter of Tiny Pete"
I mean, that's just top class. I like to think the guy who came up with it got a standing ovation and a small medal the next day at work.
Nothing beats robots, except maybe for headlines that allude to extraordinarily talented babies.
following this last month: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/19/robots-research, this is the most exciting 'sounds exciting but not really exciting' period of military history ever.
Anyway, this is a brilliant quote: "We completely understand the public's concern about futuristic robots feeding on the human population, but that is not our mission," said Harry Schoell, the chief executive of Cyclone Power Technologies, one of the companies behind the machine.
"The machine's inventors say that the Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot – known as Eatr for short – does indeed power its "biomass engine" by digesting organic material, but that it is not intended to chomp its way through battlefields of fallen soldiers."
I can pretty much smell the apocalypse.
headlined THE GLITCHES OF EASTWICK.
There should really be more literary puns in tabloid papers.
I want to be the guy who decides what goes on the Argus posters!
We had adorning our living room wall at Milner Road for ages :
"BRIGHTON ADDICTS PHONE BOX DECISION"
Just ... WHAT?!
I'm not one to give up though. Especially when some of these are so asthmatically funny.
check your inbox!!!