Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
Not nearly as shit as I was led to believe.
I'm just really, really lonely
I'm sorry, I'm not ready for that kind of commitment.
Or maybe just the word tang... or not.
"Originally, Tango was the name of the orange flavour in a range of different flavoured drinks that each had their own name."
Not actually a word. But nowhere near as shit as you'd be led to believe if it was.
what was apple tango called?
but it was a fairly agreeable action film.
I think the geek contingent (aintitcool et al) has far too much say in these things.
I'm sure Watchmen would have been a better film if they hadn't pandered to the nerds and made it so close to the comix.
Have you seen Terminator 4? That wasn't bad either
It's a solid 7/10 film. Good effects/action, plus Gambit.
All that quibbling about plot holes and "unbelievable" adamantium bullets.
We're in a world where a number of people have independantly skipped many many incremental stages of evolution to suddenly develop super duper powers. So I'm quite ready to suspend disbelief.
does it end pretty much where the first film is about to begin?
nah maybe like 10 or 15 years before or something.
are shit, when it's presenting try-hard and clichéd attempts at establishing "character motivation", as though it's not only possible but preferable for science fictional creatures who possess all kinds of fantastic physical abilities (immortality, retractable claws, superhuman strength, etc.) to be "believable" as "human" in all other respects (i.e. "psychologically").
Then it walks in front of a mirror, remembers that it's a comic-book-action film and gets with the programme.
It is good
I had it recently with I Am Legend
but Gambit and Deadpool are so shit. How to kill 2 great characters...
I'm done with comic book films. Almost always unrelentingly awful