Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
the Damien Hirst of noise. discuss.
it could be true. i'm happy for it to be though as i think they're both alright. although hirst's photorealism stuff was annoying. what's better than spots of pure colour?
as stylistically i'd probably liken them more to jackson pollock
in that they both produce things that are somewhat extreme in terms of their fields. However, I think that Hirst set out with more of an intention to be sensational whereas Wolf Eyes are the true bandits of noise and chaos. Prove me wrong.
nate young yelping after the reverb and distortion cuts out?
it sounded terrible for a minute..horrifying...but then the reverb cut out and he was going '''laaa laaa...laaalaaa laaaaa'
But I'm only assuming your actual point..i think its negative...
They can both be accused of peddling sensationalist posturing in the guise of being extreme when they are in fact very conservative and actually appeal to rather conservative tastes afor a market that thinks its sophisticated.
But I don't thin kthats fair for wolf eyes..i think they just love having fun with noise..and they;ve been doing ti for years...hirst can fuck himself with a shark penis
in the thread about animals you'd have sex with if you HAD to?
think he mentioned a cow..