Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
it tells me 20, but i reckon 3 is more likely.
That silhouette on the main page is priceless. I could take 22 apparently, which is surprisingly low given how ruthless I told them I'd be
which about what I reckon I could take
I imagine it'd be like a cross between Dead Rising and a McFly concert.
i'm a far nicer person than you.
I'm slightly more evil
somehow i doubt this. i live with a four-year-old and that motherfucker isn't defeated easily.
except i only got 8
The Admissions department at Goldsmiths must never know
scored low on the physical side but made up for it with lack of morals!
but i'd like to highlight my favourite question.
"During the fight, would you feel morally comfortable picking up a child and using him/her as a weapon to throw at other children? "
Which is way more than I could actually take!
Get the little b******s!
morals for this board.
i struggle with my two <5 year old nephews.
Bring on the little buggters!
But probably none, because I'm afraid of children.
I'm quite proud!
I'm going to the Early Learning Centre immediately.
which one, i want to come watch :D
I think in real life it would be more, assuming they hadn't been trained since birth by the KGB
The key would be to not get bogged down - hit hard and keep moving. Once they can grab onto you in large numbers you're gonna get pulled down, then your hair will be getting pulled and it's all over.
Oh, and 26.
this a rip of a mcsweenys article?
if so it's like one of my favourite pieces of writing on that site, like, ever.
It's an amusing thought.
would you feel morally comfortable picking up a child and using him/her as a weapon to throw at other children?". Mega-lolz.
Anyway, 24. Not as good as I was expecting.
I'd use tactical manoeuvres - like, getting them to turn on each other.
I don't even like most children.