Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
get in line
am looking forward to seeing the picture.
I am a perv.
sounds good for giggles!!
on that unsigned thing she was well cute.
pity she fancied some twonk out of one of the bands that got through
I'd hit that shit.
to dog ugly, bit like me
but that might well be because I've heard her speak
but not being used / released til next autumn. Does that seem a bit too long to anybody else? Mainly as her image will probably change and also because she might be forgotten about / be 'uncool' then.
22-year-old singer also credited new boyfriend Chemical Brothers star Ed Simons
i've never heard this.
together a couple of months I think. I know this because I read the sun.
the attraction. Her face is very average, and her body is, I would say, worse. Maybe I just have ridiculously high standards in lingerie models (lolz), but she really don't float my boat.
maybe Agent Provocateur wanted to go in another direction / market and have a girl who looks like one you can find out drunk, just coe out of a club at 3am in any town on a Friday night?
but i'm not of the opinion that skinny = beautiful. Not that I'm a chubby chaser or anything. I just remember that photo of her in the tabloids of her in the sea with her tits out, and they looked pretty horrible. I was more turned off than on, tbh.
but, i don't think she has a bad body...?
just not particularly feminine. seems like an odd choice to front a lingerie ad campaign!
is that cellulite on the back of her knees?!
and she has a face that is frightening enough to give me nightmares.
You can't buy a decent pair of knickers in AP for under £60.
They're simply trying to make their rich-girl-come-slut lingerie appeal to people who probably can't afford it.
Ah yes, I see, because a girl wants to dress up in something a bit risqué for herself, or for a significant other, then they are a slut?
You've really, really thought that one through, eh? Some fabulous reactionary stupidity there.
I've been looking at AP underwear for the last ten years.
I think I'm quite aware of their market and who/what they appeal to and stand for and also how they brand themselves.
So - fuck off, thanks.
i like how you react to this but non of the sexist crap everywhere
(er, like im doing now)
Girls Aloud sara is any lingerie model and yet there she is in awful pictures advertising ultimo underwear. It's more about celebrity than anything else. If she wasn't Lily Allen there'd be no kudos in getting her to model for them. Lingerie models aren't that great anyway unless you're a hetero male who doesn't like fashion.
Let's just compromise and say any woman is a potential lingerie model.
she looks pretty good
I'm not a fan of Girl's Aloud's look - too made up and I don't think her body is great, a world away from:
Is it a pre requisite to idolise Girls Aloud in some way. Honestly I don't equate girls like them with beauty nor do I believe their bodies are particularly amazing.
but she has a really good body i think. in that photo anyway.
she's not too skinny, actually has boobs and curves also.
if that's your thing. I've seen the pics in the lite or london paper which are being used for the campaign showing Sara with her arms dangling in a corpse like way and she looks really thick bodily, not shapely in a sexy way. Maybe it was just a bad angle and good luck to them. I know celebs are replacing models on a lot of lucrative campaigns.
I noticed in the London paper some readers were saying Allen shouldn't be used and instead cheryl Tweedy should be. That ignorant fool.
and their 'exclusivity' in brand image is now a thing of the past.
I don't think Lilly Allen is AP material. Kate Moss, Maggie G, and even Kylie, yeah, but Lilly? I don't think she's 'stylish' enough.
isn't she quite unattractive?!
Especially since she 'slimmed down' by hypnosis?! It's called lip love! And is that really a great message to be sending out to young girls. Hey, every girl needs to drop two dress sizes!!! (oh, fuck off Allen)
Still doesn't disguise the fact that she's a mouthy talentless twat does it?!
and its not like shes slimmed down to an unhealthy level, and most of the AP models, and the industry in general are worse role models.
generally make people attractive. I don't like Lily's. And since she's not blessed with 'niceness' one would expect her (like those 'model' things) to make up for it in the looks department- which she doesn't. All in all she's a loser in life, abeit a rich loser, who's probably having a far better time of being a twat than i ever could. xxx
the high street "sex shop" industry has suffered a decline, perhaps lily pigface was cheaper than someone, er, desirable?
so minimum would have been £100,000. There's better choices out there who would do it for less like Billie Piper.
hope that works.
I think she's very pretty, but I also reckon she's 'like me', same body shape and stuff. So if stuff suited her, I imagine it might suit me too. Whereas I would never think that about someone like Kate Moss or something.
Those pics are gonna be pure wank bank matierial
like the bitchiness in this thread though
I can't put my finger on it. It's the eyes I think, there's something not right and very right about her at the same.
I'm going for a lie-down
i'm incredibly bored.
poor choice. but the strongbow and hoody made me laugh
i'd be happy.
ARE YOU TAKING NOTES BOY?
She's a ruffian
there's good news all over the place today!
she's an acquired taste, but she's cute.
'I'd belt her one'
'I'd hit that shit'
Such charming gentleman grace DIS.
about you pissing yourself in a club again then. let's take DiS's notion of class up a notch!
and what I said was with tongue firmly in cheek.
on a policeman's feet. There is a difference
some defensive gentlemen grace DIS ;)
I resent that slight on my character. If it actually got down to it, I'd be well romantic. I wouldn't curse or anything. And I don't bring in the midgets until we've been going out at least six months.
I find that photo really attractive. I've never really had a thing for her though.
is that actually her
except i phrased it awkwardly, a la "not particularly feminine".
I'm just surprised a lingerie company would pick her to front their ads as opposed to someone with a more classically feminine shape (someone with more curves). But maybe I'm not moving with the times and it's all about every woman being able to picture themselves in AP products, like nice_squirrel said earlier...
She was totally gorgeous on nevermind the buzzcocks awhile ago.
She seems pretty cool i guess.