Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
They get all the good looking white girls...
I don't find black girls very attractive.
Don't know how the friends feel about guys.
who used the "black never go back" line unironically
why rule out a whole group of people on the basis of their skin colour? You have to maximise your chances I reckon
with the 6 pack?! All the girls in the office love him.
Apart from me. I find his sexy dancing a bit intimidating...
yeaah. he's an attractive fella. despite the sixpack, which is actually a bit nauseating.
the other day about the worlds sexiest celebrities. Usher's got a cleavage between his hip bone and his six pack which women go crazy for apparently. i'm with you, over sculpted pumped up bodies are gross to me. Especially when it's covered in slime and bumped and grinded on the tv. yuk.
the chap has a nice face. really not interested in his hip cleavage, mind. definitely in agreement with you. few male characteristics are less appealing than a 'gym body'. ugh.
preferably while clad in a zoot suit :D
...gym bodies are NOT appealing to all girls!
*eats another pie*
but toned is appealing to all girls.
yeah, go easy on the pies although that's hardly an issue for you Grinner!
It was odd to see how women reacted to a guy who was strutting around the pool at a party here last week. Most said: "Ooo, he's very built up, isn't he? But it's a bit arrogant."
Patting my tummy, I cracked open another beer and rejoiced inside.
it's deeply unsexy. it's like looking at a human body with a layer of insulating wadding around it. and with the gym bunny type, you can't imagine them being attracted to anyone more than themselves. i guess it's the male equivalent of the fake tanned, bleached, fake-boobed barbie cyborgette.
fellas that look like they just happen to be attractive, rather than having striven all their lives to look a certain way, are far more appealing.
it's a sure sign of either idiocy or deep seated psychological issues.
they always work out on their upper bodies and then forget their legs which trundle along underneath them looking like something from the misfits.
'fellas that look like they just happen to be attractive, rather than having striven all their lives to look a certain way, are far more appealing.'
isn't that a little picky? and harsh?
Not all girls feel the same, some girls like men who manicure their nails, have Tony and Guy haircuts and bleach their teeth :)
doesn't mean we're as rigid as boys in our likes and dislikes though.
except you are?
I think a lot more boys say 'girl type x is most attractive and every girl outside of that mould isn't' than girls would say about men. I think boys have a type and then rigidly stick to it. There's less curiosity and desire to try something else there if you take away the sexual/seed sowing aspect of male-female relationships.
my assumption is that women have one type and men have multiple types.
So, if you're a man and you're short, to pick a random example, it is simply a negative. If you're a woman and you're short, it is a positive for those men that prefer short women.
i'd hardly say i ever like boys who are beyond 6' doesn't mean I couldn't ever. I think since women are more objectified than men people are used to deciding that one consistent type of female is more attractive than others whereas men are less objectified so women aren't used to being told that man type x is the only valid form of attractiveness. It's not uncommon to hear that 'men go for physical attributes and women for power and status.'
i still think that male tastes are pretty catholic and focus on things that are neither positive nor negative whereas for women it's entirely a zero-sum thing.
But I might just be argumentative and feeling down because my girlfriend told me i was fat over the weekend and had to lose weight. Who knows? :p
That's rude of her.
You rarely see threads on DiS where it's just female members going on about their ideal of male attractiveness and it's the rigid, hard bodied stereotype that is being raved over. I find men quite predictable. There are threads on here with statements akin to All x women are hot and i've never seen that from the female side.
men tend to talk about things like at to send signals to their mates as much as anything else. perhaps women are simply more secretive?
i've certainly seen the occasional post that fits that description, although i agree they're uncommon.
just the ones you hear about all like the same sort of women, as that is reflected in their personal tastes/ personality.
don't have the same tastes as women who read Cosmopolitan whereas the tastes of men on DiS and in general that show no commonalities with men who read FHM in their music/style tastes or intellect appear to have the same tastes in women.
if you are talking about generally accepted attractive women. such as mischa barton or someone, the majority of women would find her attractive, whereas it is exactly the same with someone like brad pitt etc. etc. the vast majority of women will find him attractive (such is my experience)
amongst my friends, you'd more likely get graham coxon or jarvis, alex james etc etc.
quite a few males on here don't like kate nash but then she isn't conventional looking.
Even Johnny Depp has girls who don't get it.
but the point stands that there are several conventionally attractive people of either sex that most people would agree to liking. just because some men are more vocal about this, does not mean that its entirely limited to men.
Brad Pitt is actually aging badly. I just don't think girls place as much emphasis on physical attractiveness as boys, we're not programmed to analyse men or objectify them in the same way men are made to look at women.
i will admit to finding some women i see attractive based purely on looks, but for me to really fancy someone id have to know them personally. from my experience women are no different. it varies from person to person.
Brad Pitt is one of those people that looked good for about three years, when he was young, and now he just looks peculiar. See also L D Caprio, if you can call what he looked like 'good'
there's no accounting for taste.
i've never seen kate nash in FHM
f'rinstance - the number of times you hear guys say 'ew, skinny girls', or 'ew, fat girls'. leads a girl to believe that guys only go for the girl that fits their 'ideal' body type. which, as i'm sure many people will support me on, realistically isn't the case. [a] not wishing to speak on behalf of anyone else, there are lots of characteristics i find appealing, but many of these would be grotesque if they existed as part of the same person. [b] you can say all you want about 'types', but then you meet someone who fits none of them - and floors you completely.
i probably have two 'types'. roughly half the guys i've gone out with actually corresponded at all with those 'types'.
i hate how many quotation marks i've used in this post.
i consider someone who looks like they're comfortable with how they look - and who happens to have the attributes i find attractive - appealing. i don't think that's harsh. it's the difference between liking someone for what they are, and liking someone for what they're trying to persuade the world they are.
and i guess it depends on what you consider attractive. i'm not suggesting guys are only attractive if they look like brad pitt/johnny depp/*insert universally 'attractive' guy here*.
i fully reserve the right to be picky.
get less than 30 replies...
My female flatmates were talking about guys yesterday.
A lot had a thing for black men and black men only for at least a phase in their lives.