Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
I don't get it.
your job is to scare off the Poles
to prove from first principals what can be proved (by contrived logic) to be true........it actually does work because even if you assume the logic to be mad then the madness still exists (it works beyond the manifestation in verbal imagined language) because even if it is only a construct/manifstation of language realising itself, then it does still (by its own self definition) exist.
Perhaps what this really was was a rediscovering of 'self realisation' by (descartes wasnt it?)
was getting 'outside his head' .....proving that was real. I dont think he did this truely
but not in linguistic logic
and yet it continues to be true that "I think". Oh no :(
do not progress any further with this line of thought/logic or you will dissappear out of existance, with a puff
You can't really prove anything exists. It could be a figment of your imagination.
The only thing you can actually prove exists is yourself. In order to be thinking, you have to be.