Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
if our penis isnt designed to go?
If u believe God created us then gay sex is a sin
"natural" is a fallacious idea
anal sex is fine
that's it really
its just the thought of me ever in any circumstances being considered sexy that makes me laugh.
im pretty happy with the way i look most of the time although i might change a few things.
its just theres a difference betweeen finding yourself ok looking and seeing yourself as sexy isnt there?
i dunno about the real you though.
i could take something like good looking as a compliment and would be very pleased if someone called me it, but sexy im more embarassed.
it makes me think of peter stringfellow. not because i think hes sexy mind, because its seedy and like him.
I don't know what that means, but it sounds like it led on to my post. I don't really want a serious discussion tbh, I was just throwing it out there.
not you jas, just the argument
I am always tempted to argue strenuously in favour against the weaker points in someone's argument.
There are some things that are natural - for example the dominant traits of humanity.
Re: philandering: 2/3 marriages end in divorce. I am not convinced that monogamy is inbuilt, in he slightest. Although I'm perfectly sure the monogamous instinct is, for preservation of the theoretical child. To maximise the potential of living on, or whatever.
I am also not convinced that the age of consent is really accurate, tbh. People are physically ready for sex a few years younger.
However, there are emotional concerns that come into play. Hence the need for an age of consent, or a system of monagamy.
What I take from it:
People are all nurture, no nature?
And behaviour is down to random personality factors?
That seems a bit simplistic and dense.
Humanity is roughly 50,000 years old
Marriage is roughly 2,500 years old
You could say that the 'nature' has been there a lot longer than the societal idea has.
How lucky we are.
All ideas can be justified. You seem to be suggesting nobody can posit anything for fear of it being seen as rationalising and self-interest.
Bollocks to that.
You're now stating the obvious.
I'd argue that the root of monogamy in it's current form was a societal construct to try and solidify procreative relationships to suit societal and economic needs.
And the precedents for monogamy set by the rest of the natural world.
You suggest that a person has the power to compeltely overrule who they are as defined by 50,000 years of evolution. This is where I become a determinist, and at the same time, a humanist, by defying the logic or morality.
swap 'excuse' for 'explain'
well imply away. i don't make arguments in order to justify my own actions, i make arguments because it's what i see and think. a lot of it is very speculative... but that's thought for you.
the point of it is that you have an inbuilt test of whether your girlfriend loves you enough to trombone you
Thanks, but I'll just have a nice cup of tea. Milk and sugar, please.
go on I dare u!
when I was forced to transport drugs by a vicious prison gang. And come to think of it, it was a rather pleasant experience.
after expunging the contents of ones bowels.
is that true?
This actually enlightens me
didnt u quit?
on this pretty much show it
I guess it's just the most direct route to a gland that isn't really intended to be directly stimulated
is to suggest that maybe it's not such a crime...?
what they said ^
I wouldn't say it was 'wrong' though.