Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

Important legal question

chiaroscuro [Edit] [Delete] 15:58, 29 June '07

Inspired by today's aborted car bomb.

If a terrorist backs out of an attack before committing it and gives the plans up to police, surely he doesn't get charged with conspiracy to murder or whatever. Yes? OK.

So, if a group of suspected terrorists get caught before they actually manage to hurt anyone, how can they be prosecuted given
a). they didn't actually hurt anyone
b). the potential exists that they could have backed out, and
c). the potential that they could have been preparing 'potentially viable explosive devices' ironically?

By the same token, do I get the Nobel Prize for medicine for ineptly trying to cure AIDS with a mixture of Ibuprofen and Ribena?

Yes, so I had a couple of pints at lunch but this has not affected my ability to reason.


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND