The New Batman Film Fanboy Centric / Social // Drowned In Sound

The new Batman film - Fanboy-centric

stabby3 [Edit] [Delete] 21 replies 13:06, 25 May '07

http://ibelieveinharveydent.com

http://ibelieveinharveydenttoo.com

Heath Ledger as The Joker tho? hmmm.

View Nested Linear

Cool. Er...

I liked Batman Begins though it wasn't as good as I wished.

TheoGB | 25 May '07, 13:07 | X
he has the right mouth

he's pretty (in a Knight's Tale esp)

starshaped | 25 May '07, 13:07 | X
my friend was on the set recently

he kicked the Batmobile.

monpot | 25 May '07, 13:09 | X
- Oh
  
  and I thought Paul Bettany would have made a better Joker, but I'm willing to reserve judgement.
  
  monpot @monpot | 25 May '07, 13:10 | X
  - And re: Harvey Dent
    
    they'll use bits of The Long Halloween and that to tease the Dent/Two Face thing in the same way they teased Harry becoming Goblin through Spiderman 2, so Two Face will be the main baddie in the '3rd' film. I reckons.
    
    monpot @monpot | 25 May '07, 13:12 | X
    - Well yeah of course
      
      Interesting that they're trying to do the same thing as before, aren't they? I like that Billy Dee Williams had to be bought out of that contract but I'd have loved to have seen his take on Two Face for Tim Burton.
      
      TheoGB @monpot | 25 May '07, 13:16 | X
The Joker looks a bit scary

http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/labels/heath%20ledger.html

bobbygeorge | 25 May '07, 13:10 | X
- I like it
  
  I think this will be good!
  
  starshaped @bobbygeorge | 25 May '07, 13:11 | X
i rewatched Batman Begins the other day

i'm really looking forward to this.

guntrip | 25 May '07, 13:11 | X
- it will be ace
  
  chris-budget @guntrip | 25 May '07, 13:12 | X
- Until you realised no Katie Holmes?
  
  TheoGB @guntrip | 25 May '07, 13:17 | X
batman begins

was pretty pefect, except the ending didn`t tallie up with the first one and katie holmes did not fit the part she was given

Mortgage_Boy | 25 May '07, 13:12 | X
- The film must have been
  
  great if not even katie holmes couldn't ruin it for me.
  
  starshaped @Mortgage_Boy | 25 May '07, 13:14 | X
  - ^confusing sentence
    
    millionaire @starshaped | 25 May '07, 13:23 | X
At least Katie Holmes isn't in it

But 2008? What the fuck is with these 3 year gaps? The fucking pulled off a LOTR film EVERY YEAR, mofos and they're putting out a Harry Potter film every 18 months.

Star Wars only had 3 year breaks because Lucas was doing EVERYTHING and there wasn't a single physical set...and before that because the SFX stuff just wasn't there to do it. I find it hard to believe the likes of Batman and Spiderman really need this much of a break to put them together.

TheoGB | 25 May '07, 13:15 | X
- Well LOTRs were all pre-filmed
  
  i'm guessing it's all to do with marketing campaigns and the like i guess. plus Chris Nolan's doing other films as well in between.
  
  monpot @TheoGB | 25 May '07, 13:17 | X
  - Yeah they were
    
    but the filming side isn't really the slog. Harry Potter isn't.
    
    I honestly think it's more about studios seeing the Star Wars thing and reckoning there's more money to be made by taking this long... I'm sure they could have released Spider-Man III last year.
    
    TheoGB @monpot | 25 May '07, 13:18 | X
    - i think it might have something
      
      to do with actor availability and they probably wanted to wait and see if it was a success.
      
      bobbygeorge @TheoGB | 25 May '07, 13:22 | X
      - Get real:
        
        My answer had far more hyperbole and wild speculation and so is naturally the more correct one.
        
        You'll be saying we shouldn't lynch paediatricians next!
        
        TheoGB @bobbygeorge | 25 May '07, 13:24 | X
- the wait makes it
  
  more exciting!
  
  starshaped @TheoGB | 25 May '07, 13:17 | X
- 3 years
  
  is normal
  
  -Raz- @TheoGB | 25 May '07, 13:23 | X

View Nested Linear

« Back to Social

Boards