Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
chicken or the egg?
isnt a fixed concept, thanks to evolution
eggs have been around muich longer than chickens. whether youd have considered them chicken eggs is irrelevant.
chickens dont exist in any definite manner. eggs do, more so.
i only have gcse biology, but im pretty sure that whether i make sense or not, i'm 100% right
don't exist? Are you talking of evolution or are you actually denying their existence?
that the "chicken" by is only a concept created by man to describe something that's like a chicken. There are loads more of the chicken "species", but eggs are more definite, as they can be defined by "something which is fertilised for procreation" or words to that effect.
So therefore, the chicken is only a creation of man, and an egg is not. So the egg came first, sort of.
less sense to be fair. How is the chicken any more one of man's creations than an egg? By that I mean, they're nothing to do with man whatsoever. We called the feathered thingy a chicken, we called the crackable thingy that comes out of it an egg. But that's about it.
IN GOOD HUMOUR!
the concept, it just wasn't communicated very well. You're a fucking idiot. <IN SUBLIME HUMOUR!
because two deifferent birdies.
shit chickens don't sex do they?
there goes my theory
cos all creatures are in the (very very very) slow process of evolution, for the sake of pragmatism we can refer to what we have nowadays as a chicken, but the characteristics of chickenhood are still evolving.
thus, if we go through millions of generations of chickens, back to when the were the dinosaury things of their antecedence, we could identify the first ever chicken.
and that would have been born from an egg that came out of the cunt of something that we wouldnt quite call a chicken.
of course, identifying this first chicken would be like identifying when a plate becomes a bowl as you steepen the sides, so not entirely objective, but wherever you mark the changeover, it still applies.
and, simply, eggs have been around for longer than chickens, and the fact that they werent chicken eggs is irrelevent, cos they often housed the ancestors of what would become eggs.
anyway, thats the evolutionary aspect. if we go with creationalism, the chicken came first, cos god created fish and fowl on the 5th day (or 6th. my preschool acronyms and escaping me), not eggs.
how arrogant is it to have made up an answer to one of the great "unanswerable" riddles?
how does this arrogance make me feel?
so i WIN
not gonna watch it.
"your mum cos my cock's so big and was rubbin' up on all her vital areas all at once, prompting her to gush, drenching my entire lower abdomen before i cherry danished her and called the ambulance, patted her on the fanny and whispered "awooga" softly in her ear"
and speared her through the eye with my massive penis.
only got one G.
No i'm sure it has two. :-)
been ill that day.
is the new black
If a tree falls in a forest and noones around to hear it, does it make a sound?
Whos with me?
even a forest if noone's around to see it?
You prove the forest exists.
WUT IF I LEAVE A DICTAPHONE??!??!?!?!?
tree would land on it and crush your evidence.