Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
which one are you?
but couldnt be sure
told me that god only gave women boobs cos the cleavage looks a bit like an arse crack, and as men often want to have sex with arses, their attention would instead be drawn to the front of the woman, and babies would be created.
if gods mind worked that way, the world would be a wonderful place.
David Brent too?
i heard it many moons ago. maybe it is true?
tits AND arse!! Eh? Eh?
is going to the
when your piss is burning?
what happened to the big hoo haa surrounding the 10th anniversary of Trainspotting? I was just thinking of films that think they're better than they actually are.
I'm with Grinders on his erm, ideals
and at my graduation his drama teacher was presented with an award, and talked about how some of his students had gone on to higher things whilst "some, like danny boyle, went to lower"
if not a bit erm....naughty?
What a crock!
today i worked out a 3 point system for assessing the attractiveness of peoples for sexual relationship reasons:
looks: physical, dress sense etc
niceness: how pleasent, nice, easy to get on with, how well they treat people
interestingness: intelligence, funniness, taste in things, suchlike.
and decided i rank them interestingness/looks/niceness.
how do YOU rank them, and is there anything important that cant be put in those categories?
you can give the three categories values and modifying ratios and then multiply and get a percentage.
like, and i must stress that im making this up as i go along and dont give numerical values to people;s characteristics as they go along, i'd probably weight things as interestingness: 7, looks: 6, niceness: 5
so if i'd "give" someone 5 for looks, 8 for niceness and 6 for interestingness, theyd get
which is pretty much why i'm single.
(not "do me" like that)
You realise you're officially Having Fun With Maths? Maybe you should be a teacher.
ever since my dad told me about how he killed little vietnamese villagers with trigonometry (see the nelson's column thread)
my system is for relationshippy partners. that you are horrendously ugly doesnt stop my love for you.
but not necessarily in order. Niceness and interestingness would have to go hand in hand (you can't have one without the other - as sand in the old popular them tune to Married with Children). And if their looks are also deemed acceptable, then that's a bonus.
You did miss out tits and arse from your list, though. Srsly, it's just a combination of all those things to get the total package. But niceness is most important to getting on with anyone, I suppose. Unless you're a cunt.
They are totally spikey and bad with relationships.
I don't get what you're on about really. But I get a feeling I don't agree with you on it.
or something to that effect. I'll shut up now
or someone who values worthwhile conversation.
you seem perfectly reasonable to me
but im just saying that i disagree
you big dick
i'm not actually sure to the extent to which i'm joking when i say that.
but not everyone can be interesting or good looking.
Some people seem nice but turn out to be not nice at all on a very basic level. It's weird when that happens - when you discover someone has a selfish heart, quite far down the line.
a nice face > a nice body
but as samuel l jackson would say, personality goes a long way. someone becomes almost instantly unattractive if they're a complete wanker. true fact.
If someone turns out to be unpleasant in some way, they diminish in attractiveness. To me, at least. Because they're not worth having, or something.
that last point you made is so so sooo true. I've seen many people that on the surface i thought were pretty attractive. But as i got to know them and realised they were pretty horrid people (male and female), with terrible characters, that attraction turned to horror. You then can't understand why you found them attractive as you can no longer see it.
i'm an ASS MAN all the way.
ASS MAN, ASS MAN