10-word reviews and Pitchfork-style scores for My Bloody Valentine's 'm b v' then...
We've all had two weeks to chew it over now.
Shoot...
- Relevant artist taggings:
- None
Thread not appearing correctly? Click here to rebuild | Report this
- Mount Kimbie - Cold Spring Fault Less Youth
- Baptist Generals - Jackleg Devotional to the Heart
- Tribes - Wish to Scream
- "More bands should split up" - Brett Anderson opens up to DiS about the return of Suede
- CocoRosie - Tales of a GrassWidow
- Laurel Halo - Behind the Green Door
- Frankie & the Heartstrings - The Days Run Away
- Drowned in Manchester #15 – May 2013
Twitter
Facebook
Last.fm
SoundCloud
MySpace
Friendster
RSS
Sadly doesn't live up to the brilliance of 'Only Tomorrow'
7.3
It is a lot better than it should be, considering.
7.8
Haven't listened to a single track but it's MBV.
10.0
Better than I thought it'd be. Should still be better. 7.6/10
MBV? New MBV! New MBV! New MBV! New MBV! S'alright...
6.9
don't understand the fuss. they're just not that good live.
0
A record I have enjoyed listening to on the whole
8.4
Not really familiar with it that much yet. So far
8/10
My mistake
8.0
here's two: 1. So this is the guy who played with Patti Smith?
2. old out of touch rockers don't know what's good anymore
yawn/apathy
old sounding then quieter then louder with drum and bass
8.1
Superb, especially tracks seven and nine. Needs a few listens. 9.2
not sure i really care anymore but still pretty good
7.4
not heard it yet but I imagine it's probably ok
6.3
Gets better with every listen. It's just great dream pop.
9.2
only heard it on youtube not convinced enough to purchase
7.3
Work-shy fops
6.1
very long and boring, made me tired, fell asleep
2.3
My Bloody Valentine. My Bloody Valentine. My Bloody Valentine. My.
mb.v/10
Can I have a pound for every 8 this gets?
8.0
i wish it was produced like a phil collins record
4.0
:'')
Dreamy, droney, inaccessible and far less tuneful tan "Loveless"
6.0
Rewarding album, reveals more with every listen.
9.4
Half the songs are nines, half the songs are fours.
6.5
Very true!
Still woulda plumped that score up to an 8 tho :)
Better than the stuff most of you fuckin' divs like
9.0
Like a startled cat jumping through a long forgotten window
21.25 years
Sounds like my dad's farts put through a nice amp
8.6
If it had come out 20 years ago, 8.5
Now, 6.5
Would be incredible with instrumental bits like on Loveless.
8.0
It's the new My Bloody Valentine, I've just
9.0
:D
is it still 1991 ? no, didn't think so. er, yeah.
1.5
its an album that gets by on legacy rather then good songwriting but it has its moments
6.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3
Nowhere near as good as the impression that i get
amount of wood knocked/10
Failed to linger in my mind much
6.3
i really like it. it sounds really nice.
9/10
It feels like they haven't changed at all. AWESOME.
9.1
Only tracks 6, 7, and 9 are worth bothering with.
6.5
Some of the melodies are shit.
But some good songs.
6.5
Just to say, you're ruining an art form here, squire.
p4k.0
Can't wait for the new MBV record in 2035.
8.5
Too much "To Here Knows When", not enough "What You Want"
"Who Sees You" is fantastic though
7.2
Listened twice, left absolutely no impression at all. Banana, highlighter.
Erm, 4 or something.
It sounds like someone keeps putting their finger on the edge of the record
33.3
Doesn't feel like that work of MBV to be honest.
8.1
yakkety yak, my bloody valentine are back