Boards

Terrible band.

Only had a couple of listens, so can't judge how good the album is, but it definitely aint a 2.8

Have not been able to get into this album at all though and have been struggling to really put my finger on why that is. This review, whilst unduly harsh, has kind of verbalised a more extreme version of the reaction I've had to it.

It's still typically self-absorbed but with none of the humour, charm or linguistic dexterity of the last few albums which let him get away with it.

That said, Paper Heart is the massive highlight for me (Sod in the Seed aside) and that's the track the review has it's knives out most for.

don't tend to read reviews much, but i just read that one. basically reads as: "yoni is a cunt." which isnt the nicest thing to say/read - but i guess when you put yourself out there, it's gotta be expected.

He jumps to a lot of conclusions here and I think misinterprets a lot of the lyrics. You may remember the last time the writer was guilty of exactly the same and was then torn apart; http://futureoftheleftv2now.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/based-on-novel-of-same-name.html

I'm all for criticism, but when you make such harsh judgements on a record I think you have to be absolutely sure you're getting right. For me at least, Cohen isn't even getting close to the heart of this record. I mean: "Instead, a sizable portion of Mumps, etc. turns out to be a longform rumination on what it means to be Yoni Wolf, Lead Singer of WHY?." Well, yeah. Surely that's the entire fucking appeal of Yoni's songwriting? For a reviewer who claims to think Why? are a 'great' band, it baffles me how he has arrived at that statement.

I prefer this album to Eskimo Snow tbh.

at all. couldn't listen to it more than once through. 2.8 feels about right to me...

but Elephant Eyelash and Alopecia are two of my all time favourite albums. Why? are also amazing live.

Songs from Alopecia were just in a league of their own compared to songs from their other albums. How can I love Alopecia so much but get so turned off by everything else they've done? I've listed to Mumps, etc. a couple of times and although I can't put a score out of a hundred on it (stupidly flawed scoring system anyway), I really don't find it good at all.

couldn't finish it

don't agree with the reviewer at all. really like the new album, i think it's a return to form as I really didn't like Eskimo Snow.

i thought it was pretty dull
further few listens and im really into it. doubt it'll ever mean as much to me as alopecia does, but even that i didn't really like at first.
i find pitchfork's review a bit weird. the idea that it's "unlistenable" just doesnt seem in the slightest bit real to me. the writer admits that he's just talking about the vocals and lyrics, but i can't see what line he's suddenly crossed where youy couldnt listen to it for enjoyment or whatever he says.

im interviewing yoni this evening for DiS. anyone have anything particular they'd like asked?

but hasn't Yoni always written like that?

Barely addresses the instrumentation or production.
Just has it in for Yoni's lyrics

I've always had the feeling someone at P4K wasn't a fan of Why?/Anticon in general, and this review seems like an easy shot at a band who's gone slightly 'out of fashion'...

To call Eskimo Snow a career highlight and this record 'career suicide' in one piece is baffling. I'm not a huge fan of recent Why? (more of a Subtle man, me) or this record, but the review is awful.

and doesn't once mention Elephant Eyelash, which the review obviously hasn't heard. Not going to listen to this record anyway but this completely nullifies the review.