Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
But it was from one of those free London papers, so I ignored it...
and you will all go mental and pretend to be fans.
but I found the whole reaction round here pretty unconvincing.
Should I have stripped off and posted pictures of my Prince-tattoo covered body?
I'd like to see Jacko do the hits, I reckon. Although I'm not sure I'd feel entirely comfortable. I still don't believe he's not a massive molester.
when i was 12 haha it was realyl good, but i was 12! he flew off on a jet pack though at the end and when i tell peopel this they think im making it up :(
'Finally, all those corporate manufactured ’lies’ who are parasites on Michael Jackson’s incomparable genius (like Timberfake and all his clones and clowns) will finally see what ultra-legendary talent is! The Glorious Resurrection of the incomparable King of Pop and Dance will expose everyone else’s mediocrity'
It'd suck, wouldn't it?
...so I think I've sadly missed out on the legendary performances of the past. As for his personal life, I'd like to say that I could separate the art from the man but I wouldn't turn up to see Gary Glitter if he had written some of the greatest tunes ever to grace a human ear drum.
I like to remember Jacko as he was, or at least as I used to think of him, and dance along to the tunes on my iPod. Besides the whole tour stinks of desperation and that would doubly taint it for me.
It is his job after all.
It's gonna cost a fortune, he's gonna be past his best and, though he's got some great songs, I wouldn't feel strongly enough to want to pay fuckloads to watch him.