Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
Disc 2 > Disc 1
If this thread has already been done, i apologise. I couldn't find it.
I'm pretty angry.
its just lots of pictures and a extra b-side album. People that think the second CD is better are just a little too difficult.
...for holding an minority opinion. It's not the case at all.
Basically, there are 4 songs i always skip on Disc 1 (15 Step, Bodysnatchers, Reckoner, House of Cards) and none i skip on disc 2, which means that disc 2 wins 8-6. It's just a better listen from start to finish. It seems a lot more cohesive and as somebody pointed out below, it sounds more like 'Radiohead'.
ok they are not difficult, they are just fucking wrong, which I do find hilarious.
i don't think we've had an In Rainbows thread yet..
I meant a thread about Disc 2, smart arse! I can't find one and i thought there'd be millions.
there's been a couple, but nowhere near as many as the download got
Last Flowers To The Hospital kicks my arse every time. 4 minute warning is just beautiful - proper Beta Band style - love it.
Very strong album - if a little short.
as opposed to Disc 1 which sounds like a frigging watered down version.
is brilliant! I love the subtle videotape reprise at the end.
In Rainbows was a double album until I received the discbox, everything is about disc one. I feel disc two is a bit of a B sides disc but it is only a bonus cd anyway.
...really isn't as good as everybody makes it out to be.
Of course. It's only as good as you make it out to be.
Like all the albums I have listen to it is exactly as good as I make it out to be.
of a slating on Pitchfork.
I want to hear it though! Excitement
...is bound to be amazing because Radiohead are amazing.
Don't thank me for my input. I know I'm amazing.