Your are viewing a read-only archive of the old DiS boards. Please hit the Community button above to engage with the DiS !
does not work.
is the pictures that illustrate the current top three stories on the music minisite front page: Winehouse, Doherty, Grindrod.
I'm also pretty shocked at your age. I thought you were in your midlate 20s. You don't look a day over 26.
I thought it said you were 32 in the article! :(
after reading it, too! Lucky my passport was handy.
the most accurate he's been about a DiSser's group, at least compared to http://music.guardian.co.uk/newbands/story/0,,2013855,00.html
Don't understand why he's dissing 'Grindrod' but any publicity is good publicity, right?
What will you be changing your name to then?
But, to be honest guys Bobby, you're no Craine.
With respect, it still annoys me that Mike Flowers is even mentioned. It shows a distinct lack of imagination... I just can't remember Mike ever doing a song like our new single...
That was your poster. Remember?
No? Ok then.
You've heard of Mark Murphy!
This coverage is only on the website I think. The only other national newspaper stuff has been The Times and their infamous 'nu-croon' label.
Music Week applauded the fact that I wasn't afraid to 'veer towards crooning'. I don't call it crooning anyway. I call it 'singing'.
apart from the Mike Flowers part !
London bands pfffft!
See you tomorrow
"If this was 1982 they'd have been on the Compact label; had it been 1987, they'd have been on él. A bit retro, a lot recherché, they're positively Proustian, daddio."
You're the enemy now, Robert.
they'd be Blue Rondo a la Turk and in 1987 they'd be Matt Bianco. A bit unfair but they beat The National ANY day
i've seen on there
and i'd like to point out that sweeping the nation is a most excellent blog, if only because they seem to give us a really good review for the summer sundae warm up parties....
Good work Grindrod!
Does anyone have a contact email for Paul Lester btw?