- Artists:
- The Used »
- Label:
- Maverick »
This set comprises a documentary, followed by a filmed live show, followed by outtakes, all accompanied by a live CD of the same show. On paper it would seem like you've got a good deal, but with only two studio albums out there's not that much meat on the bone as yet. It says on the tin that they've done a thousand live shows, but I wonder if some madness has set in amidst tour bus cabin fever, because it's about as compulsive as a plateful of boiled sprouts.
The DVD opens with a documentary which focuses on life in the tour bus (hence Berth, a fancy nautical name for 'bunk'). I wonder who in their tiny mind thought that would make for good television? Did Bert McCracken's cameo as 'token skanky boyfriend' on The Osbournes infect his brain? Perhaps painting a rock tour as a Kerouac novel or a Jim Jarmusch film might have worked, focusing on the band writing songs on acoustic guitars in hotel rooms? (If they do that.) But watching a bunch of uninspiring herberts describe their gratitude at being able to eat each other's snot and smell each other's farts in their very own custom built bus... it actually puts you right off the idea of being in a band.
On to the show... The Used are a pretty good live act, in that they know how to work an audience, how to string chords together, write good choruses, do quiet bits and loud bits where the volume goes straight up to ten and Bert's shrieking away… so you watch, waiting for the 'one louder' moment, or the transcendent tender whisper, but it never happens. You'd think the fact it was going to be filmed for a live DVD would make them really pull out all the stops at the show in question, putting time, energy and money into making it a real event, one to make each and every member of the audience feel like they'd won the lottery. Fat chance. It's very slickly filmed, but a plain white backdrop dully lit with red light makes them look like a support act. Smaller, less cash-rich bands can make much better DVDs: look at Fugazi's Instrument.
The reason artists like The Used aren't capable of generating the kind of fan cult of Marilyn Manson, Slipknot and, for that matter, touring legends like 'Maiden is because they simply don't put anywhere near as much effort into the details. I've seen the movie, and these guys are just along for the ride.
More The Used
-
Win! A pair of weekend camping tickets for Sonisphere! Plus a free download EP!
-
The Used join forces with PETA
-
The Used - Take it Away
i fucking
hate the used
yet i own both albums.
i'm not sure how this came to pass
god
no kidding, what a shitty band...the used don't deserve any sort of coverage on serious music sites...it's screamo crap for angsty 12 yr old boys who hate their mommies and want to cut their wrists...seriously, fuck this band (and no, i didn't listen to anything even *close* to this crap when i was 12...just to confirm)
that said, mister...why don't you sell the albums to some second-hand cd shop? it's a great way to get rid of shit like this, you know
you'll thank me later
i like
the cover.
it saddens me
that you think your readership needs 'Berth' explaining to them.
zarklephaser's bottomless well of rage also saddens me.
excellent
another album that i won't need to buy, with all this saving i could go and get that botox i've been after for sooo long :)
i'll be
giving this a wide berth.
I know
The Used are crapola, but I do quite like that song 'Used For Glue'.
Berth
Oh. I'm quite thick evidently. Berth made me think of bed in a yacht (used to do a lot of sailing when I was little), never one in a coach. It also struck me as a fairly specialised term, or rather an attempt to attach some romantic highbrow name to a tiny bunk bed.
no you're not thick
you knew what Berth meant. "hence Berth" was fine by me. It was the explanation of the word. If you knew what it meant why the need to tell the rest of us?
Can we not keep up with The Used's vocabulary?
I still quite like
the first album.
And I seriously cannot stand it when people, when referring to music, include any sort of reference to 'slitting their wrists'. It's such a stupid, cliched thing to say.
Do they still
Lower the key of all their songs because Bert can't sing them how they were recorded? I liked the first album, enjoyed bits of the 2nd and then went to see them live. If he can't sing the fuckers in such a high key why record them there in the first place?
haha
ya know, thats funny. i dont own either of the albums. i just have specific songs off of both of them. and another thing. I like the songs from both albums, i think they're really good. I guees i just like this type of music, oh fucking well if my opinion isn't popular. i like a lot of weird shit, and I'm sure all of you guys are gonna be like hey, fuck you alternative326, but at least i have the balls to stick up for what i like, or believe in. And I think i may acutally buy the cd/dvd not only to spite you all, but just because I like seeing the stupid shit some bands do on the road. I for one have a sense of humor. And i do like some of the songs they play so seeing them play live would be cool. And no I'm not twelve years old. I'm a 27 year old executive at reprise records.
geez.
the used have made a decent song here and there but over all, they only rank 3rd on my list. i love these guys to death. they're awesome live. but come on. i want an AMAZING album. not a live low-key piece of crap.


The Used
In Photos: Monotonix @ Hector's House, Brighton
In Photos: The Specials @ Hammersmith Apollo, London
In Photos: Camden Crawl Launch Event @ The Blues Kitchen, London
In Photos: La Roux @ Shepherds Bush Empire, London
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article