kickacdc
Comments
plus that thick, arrogant
trannie is in the band, hence 4/10 max.
you think they'd have removed
that thing by now.
except
on a program like spotify, the advertising is separated from the artist. It is a service, so no direct connection occurs. It is user directed, so if some cunt wants to listen to Girls Aloud they can, but equally they could try niche artists. Of course the carrot of money might make someone write more commercial songs, but that occurs now anyway. I mean U2 write utter excecrable shite like 'beautiful day' knowing the kickback on advertsing from all kinds of sources will be huge.
Also - "noone has ever defended the hefty cut that record companies take from record sales" --- eh? Isn't that exactly what the record companies do? They like the rip-off culture they enforced, they don't want it challenged.
I think you have a hugely careerist impression of why people make music. Also, for a true artist, the longevity of career can be many decades.
Basically, what you're saying is shite.
this is like a sixth form summary for a debating society
It's based on a premise that is actually falacious. Only in a stupid 'indier than thou' mileueu does anyone truly slate music in advertising these days. The fundamental point that is always ignored by people promoting the anti-sharing argument is that it denies the artists money; this is nonsense - the reason record companies are spitting their dummy is because the whole business was intrinsically based on conning the public, and they liked it that way, thanks very much. The public were ushered towards hyped artists or stooge pop puppets by corporate-backed playlists and TV shows. It's ludicrous that the artists would commonly be paid 5p of every £15 spend on an album. What is mucic's worth, when itunes sells a digital copy for the same price as a cd or albums can cost £14 in HMV one week and then £5 the next? Remuneration paid to the artists based on number of plays (funded by advertising) is the only tenable way of developing the market again.
In my opinion, the rich exposure everyone has to music at a young age now will inevitably lead to invention and enthusiasm in future musicians.
I think that after a few weeks of
listening to it, it's brilliant but not as 'good' as Leviathan or Blood Mountain. Not that this is too important - it's still a compelling record. Someone who knows much more than me suggested it's because the production is off a little, burying the drums and flattening the vocals. Either way, I think they'll make better albums, which is a fantastic prospect.
this is a huge and welcome
surprise....like a young Icarus Line.
god that
trannie in the middle is such a rancid human being.
er lads...
this isn't out for ages. Mastodon's new album has been out for days yet no review. What the hell is going on with DiS? Since Diver left it gets worse and worse...
Ten
is sensational. Like most people of that era I was obsessed with Nirvana, who were a completely different prospect. Pearl Jam were and remain an band to treasure. Yes they have always had a cheesy side, but this does not diminish how brilliant the songs are.
read the Rolling Stone
review....felchingly hilarious.
I agree
with many of the earlier posts. On first listen it seems a little dull, not heavy enough, not melodic enough etc. A few listens in however and it reveals itself. Certainly the equal of World's apart, another excellent album. Clearly ratings on a site like this are always by their nature too subjective, but 6/10 is ridiculous. Most average albums by indie no-hopers heard by a small crowd garner 8/10 reviews. This will be remembered as one of the best albums of the year.
what, you work hard and pay tax
to hear other peoples' opinions?! It's shocking, better write to The Dail Mail.
I thought the same
but it is the one album (for me) this year, that seeps into your brain each time. Brilliant album.
fair point
but my dad likes Queen and I think they're shite. 'Supporting where you're from', the new strange movement in football. Attendances everywhere are falling, the Sky junket will fail sooner than we all think.
in my experience
all mackems have some contrived and convoluted connection to Man Ure as a backup plan after the Red and white shite. This lad is a canny bloke though, I've always thought so after he was overheard in a Toon coffee shop slagging off 'Lahndan'music fans as pretentious twits. Something about how they turned up to gigs wearing Stetsons, and how they were all a bunch of poseurs.
why?
what else is happening?
I was going to say 'Women are the new Liars'
but then that could get me in trouble.
that grammatics
song and video thing is a joke surely? Absolutely shite.
Michael Jackson
to get back together. Yes.
don't you kind of
need a decent band in each genre to spark a revival? What is good in grunge these days?
I'd love to see
a fully-realised Glassjaw album appear. I have my doubts that Daryl will ever realise how much GJ shits all over the 'side-projects' with which he is involved.
biggest hope
for me is that Mastodon continue to release incredible albums, and that Trail of the Dead make an unlikely return to form.
who the hell
is Fearne Cotton?
lovely lass
the only woman from Sunderland who actually looks like a female, a bonny one at that.
excellent review
shows the necessary contempt for that odious little twerp, as well as appropriate hatred of his amatuerish music. However, it's not a diateribe, just a considered criticism of total garbage.
wow
who really gives a shit?
Excellent
I can only presume that after this debate CDs will be a uniform £5 and digital downloads <£3. Thank God we cleared that up.
What's that you say? Industry bigwigs with no musical talent have big mortgages? Oh well, back to p2p then.
Basically - there is no reasonable middle ground. Itunes is shite, CDs are too expensive for what you get.
I think that fundamentally
most people like to acquire physical things - it's what we're used to, we like having objects to possess and hold. The issue that the BPI and RIAA always avoid dealing with is that for decades CDs have been hugely overpriced. Now itunes is....hugely overpriced. CDs should not cost more than a recent DVD as they frequently do. The discounting argument holds for chart CDs etc but then that just perpetuates the whole problem of being herded towards directed music tastes rather than deciding what you want to listen to.
If CDs were £3-£5 I would certainly buy most of the ones I wanted. I still buy more more CDs per year than anyone I know and download a lot of dross on top of that. People buy for lots of reasons, loyalty to the band and supporting young bands being among them. However, to dismiss free p2p suggests that we should just suck it up, that CDs or rubbish quality mp3s on itunes are worth the money. They're not. Simple solution.
The libertines
would almost out-wank Razorlight in a competition of who's the biggest bunch of wankers. That is assuming such a contest is feasible.
way I see it
The best music around is all American:
TV on the Radio
Liars
Mastodon
Of Montreal
Deerhoof
Deerhunter
Where the hell are the UK bands? I cannot think of a single innovative and creative Uk band.
That's so weird
I had this unusual, meandering and peripatetic dream the other day. To cut a long story short the denouement was that you, DylerTurd are a cunt. Guess we're both pretty good at predictions.
No I've never heard it
I was just concurring with peer pressure.
This album
is indescribably crap. Terrible review.
As for liking Pendulum - a sackable offence?
Shut up
you inbred tart.
Ahem....
God that typo made it seem like I was from Middlesbrough. I meant to say 'my dad liked THEM'
you're right
Listening to the pet shops boys recently made me appreciate them more. Problem is, my dad liked me.
Another reason to like them is they are openly gay, unlike the repressed singer from Bloc Party.
I they delete Mercury
,immolate it, destroy the hard copy, claim it was by the petshop boys, dissociate themselves from it completely, forever....i reckon the album's a 7 1/2.
With it, barely a 3.
I have a fair degree
of confidence it'll be a polished turd. And you know what happens when someone tries that. I think the problem is that the lead singer thinks he's insightful: he's not, he's just someone who takes an interest in the world. He has no great intelligence or musical insight but he has a ridiculous ego. The hubris will probably cost the excellent other members of the band on this record.
Mercury was abysmal.
of course they
fell in love with the idea....and their recent problems with the IRS.....sealed the deal!
Ulrich = Lab kebab
oh shit wombat!
I think you're the first person to notice that. You're really funny and insightful.
Yet a douchebag.
Jay Reatard
is phenomenally talented; I just get the feeling that although some of these songs work and some don't, that there is a brilliant artist developing.
thommo - and you're a moron too
congratulations (ps the others aren't morons).
(you are though)
isn't
Phil Collins dead?
That Q
isn't long gone, or at least moribund, is a source of ongoing frustration. It's absolute shite.

In Photos: White Lies @ Brixton Academy, London
In Photos: Monotonix @ Hector's House, Brighton
In Photos: The Specials @ Hammersmith Apollo, London
In Photos: Camden Crawl Launch Event @ The Blues Kitchen, London
thick tranny
gobshite. I despise that man / woman.