Rockefeller

let alone 50 essential ones.

Seems to be an object in identifying random delay drenched tracks and labelling them shoegaze.

One of my computers hold no music, and is never connected to the internet. So why should I, and other owners of computers in a similar position, pay commercial concerns for something which I have no interest in.

Introducing a blanket 'tax' that will directly profit a private organisation, regardless of whether the consumer illegally downloads, or even has an interest in music, is beyond the pale. I'm aware that precedents for this type of levy exist, but they have always been highly contentious. I'm also aware the the levies have been considerably more than the 0.1% you seem to be suggesting.

If you're seriously considering campaigning for this levy, I'm going to be seriously considering whether I want to support this site.

Only slightly less depressing than your continued advocating of a bandwidth tax.

Please stop it.

And handy for the Angel. Nice.

In the hotel?

Not really sure I understand this comment. "most diabolically shit band" in no way describes Guapo, and is so wide of the mark I've got to wonder if you were at the same gig as me. Or indeed Guapo.

were at the front for this. They reckoned that the guy had tried to pull her dress down.

The footage is too close up to her face immediately before she takes a pop at the guy to call really.

In other thoughts - is what boils down to sexual assualt really OK if a female goes near her fans? Does this mean that women shouldn't go into the pit if they don't want to be groped? I think you're on slightly dodgy ground with that last comment.