Sign In:
Login with Facebook
85894
Type: Album Release date: 20/08/2012
Your Rating:

Like fish in a barrel or Ravi Bopara’s Test record, spandex-clad rockers The Darkness are something of an easy target. Still, despite looking a bit silly and not really making proper albums as such, there’s quite a lot to be said in their defence. Their utter defiance of all that is po-faced and refusal to take themselves even remotely seriously is endearing to all but the most hard-bitten cynic, they are - or were - capable of pushing out a stupid, catchy, enjoyable hit (‘Growing on Me’ and ‘I Believe in a Thing Called Love’ were at least good for a crowd sing along), and their debut album Permission to Land was pretty funny back when it came out in 2003. Furthermore Justin Hawkins and co have always been good to us purveyors of indie music, even putting a shout out to little old DiS at Reading a few years ago.

Now though, in a move similar to the BBC putting out another series of My Family, the same tiring joke is being told again in the form of third album Hot Cakes. Getting right into the spirit of the aged rock bands they pastiche the original lineup is reunited here, with Hawkins returning to the band he quit six years ago for a spell in rehab and once-fired moustachioed thinking man’s favourite Frankie Poullain is reinstated on bass, welcomed back here by Hawkins as one of “my two best mates”. It could be seen as apt that this comes out a year after Radio 2 heavily hyped a comeback album by the equally cheesy Status Quo, but then Quo have never really gone away so it’s not abundantly clear why The Darkness feel the need to step up to the role of Spinal Tap without the jokes with the exact same jokes Christopher Guest et al made in the Eighties.

This isn’t to say that fans of the band (and I guess it comes with the territory of being a novelty hair rock group, but they do seem to have an admirably ardent fan following) will be disappointed with what’s on offer here. The power chord riffs are loud and the faux-gospel harmonies are as over the top and exaggerated as the lyrics about love and rock. Also, like music’s Top Gear presenters, not one member of the fourpiece has yet learnt the difference between their bit of kit and their penis. You remember what The Darkness sounded like nine years ago? That’s what The Darkness sounds like on Hot Cakes; in a way it’s impressive that the only way this band could evolve would be to lapse into self-parody.

So what I’m saying is, the guys appear to have neatly set themselves up to be immune from criticism. Well fuck it.

I guess that these songs are deliberately generic, that it’s a whole genre of music that’s the butt of the joke here, but there’s nothing that really stands out as a hit on here, nothing to get the crowds in Whitesnake t-shirts (ironic or otherwise) moshing in the manner of Permission to Land’s hits. Sure, ‘Everybody Have a Good Time’ and ‘Nothing’s Gonna Stop Us’ might get the crowd going for a bit, but that’s largely down to their single releases, and there’s no way they can sustain a whole album. There’s also a cover of Radiohead’s ‘Street Spirit (Fade Out)’, already a live favourite, ass-fucked into The Darkness’s own style. I love Radiohead, I love ‘Street Spirit’, and some things are sacred to me, so I’ll refrain from comment.

All of the above though is really a step up from the semi-phallic opener ‘Every Inch of You’. Starting with a misleading, self-pitying line about being a loser who just loves rock & roll, things take a turn for the worse when Hawkins informs us that “Every man, woman and child wants to suck my cock”. Now, Justin Hawkins may not be expressing any inappropriate desires here, and I don’t want to imply that he is... but he is saying that, he believes, children want to blow him. I get the joke, I really do, it’s not difficult, he probably doesn’t really think that, but... Justin Hawkins said...

I imagine quoting Morrissey might be missing the point a bit here, but that joke isn’t funny anymore.

So basically, the new album sounds like The Darkness

Which, it has to be said, means I am going to like it.

So, let's review...

The Darkness' first album: critically panned, turned out to be great.

The Darkness' second album: critically panned, turned out to be great.

The Darkness' third album: critically panned...

You're right. They ARE immune from criticism. I've never known a comedy band so entirely capable of dragging half-arsed intellectual witticisms out of reviewers desperately trying to be seen as legit by disliking the undislikeable. And god forbid they tip any sacred cows...!

The Darkness are a comedy band?

I just thought they were having fun.

I'm going to buy this

Got a lot of time for The Darkness.

Cue butthurt Darkness e-teamers

Who can't comprehend that one person's opinion in a review is somehow proof of DiS having some sort of editorial vendetta against the band

You do realise

there's a world outside of metacritic, yes? It's healthier there.

gonna have a listen

but what i would say is I've just been exposed to their cover of Streetspirit and it's bloody awful.

No.

That Street Spirit cover is ace.

Nice try

Before you even get to reviewing the album you make it blatantly obvious that you are the wrong person for the job as you simply dont get this band. You try to convince us otherwise by claiming to have liked a couple of early singles, but honestly you just make it even more obvious that you are about to miss the point. What really gives you away is that you fall into the trap of comparing the two versions of Street Spirit. Dont you realise that the whole point of this cover is so that while people like you can listen to it with steam coming out of your ears, the rest of can snigger about it behind your backs? You are the butt of the joke when it comes to bands like the Darkness and to be honest you like so much of the music industry are too far up your own asshole to even realise it. Personally I think the songs on this album are quite well written, but that doesnt really matter, I enjoy it for what it is. I also enjoy listening to Radiohead because I enjoy music. What the Darkness do so well is they remind us how much fun rock and roll can be whilst poking fun at the people who have forgotten. Frankly if you are one of those people, then I feel sorry for you. I really do.

Yep, I was right

What the fuck is going on here guys?

A) If you're a Darkness fanboy/fangirl encouraged by the band's management to sing their praises, fuck off.

B) Dan Lucas's review is stylistically fine and accurate in content. He gives a couple of paragraphs of background and then three paragraphs of analysis. This is a pretty standard set up for an album review.

C) The Darkness's new album has been given a bad review because it's presumably quite poor. A positive attribute for bands is a certain level of invention, of stylistic progression during their career. By engaging in a synthesis of styles over time, the band develops musically and can lay claim to a certain degree of longevity. The Darkness have never done this.

D) Sam Patrick, I don't know who you are, but as a fellow journalist (Writer at Hewitt Sports Network? Never heard of them) I'm surprised your first response is "shithouse journalism". It seems that as a writer you fail to understand what a balanced article is, or show respect to your peers.

I think you're stretching just a little with point A)

Is it not possible that people can like The Darkness without being associated with them?

Point B) Well, that's just like, your opinion, man. Just as it was Dan Lucas', displayed here for our delectation or disagreement. This comment section exists for a reason.

Point C) I want you to look at the word 'presumably'.
Now I want you to look at the word 'never'. Now I want you to think about how bloody silly you look.

Oh dear...

a) Loads of Darkness fan boys/girls have come on here and just slagged off the reviewer without critically engaging with the review.

b) People were criticising the structure of the review, when the structure is fine. The content of the review is up for question but people were criticising the structure.

c) The Darkness have never shown any artistic development up until now, this is unlikely to change given what their whole shtick is, which is tiresome rehashed 80's hair metal. Therefore presumably this album won't be much better than their stuff before, which was reheated shite. That's why I could use the words "presumably" and "never" in that context in that paragraph.

D) Go and suck a dick. (Just lowering myself to the critical standards of you and other Darkness fans here).

Hmmm....

Im a big fan of both Radiohead and The Darkness :P and have to agree that the Street Spirit cover version with hawkins trademark wailing vocals can make ears bleed if you're not in the right mood,lol. I think a better production may have been in order to get it all working better together, as it has sounded better live. Overall, I liked the album and there are enough good tracks to give it a solid 7, but its not as consistent in quality as the first two releases. Ignoring the extra/bonus tracks, the second half to me isnt as strong as the first. My favourite track is probably Living Each Day Blind, the weakest Concrete. Everybody Have a Good Time, heavily suggests what The Darkness are all about, and I definately had one for the most part

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon