- Artists:
- My Bloody Valentine »
- Label:
- Sony »
It’s hard to know where the truth ends and the legend begins with Loveless. There’s so much artifice surrounding the second My Bloody Valentine album that the iconic shoegazers’ failure to come up with a follow-up in 20 years is almost excusable. Formed by Kevin Shields and Colm Ó Cíosóig in the early Eighties, by the early Noughties this pioneering four piece would only be referred to via a tinnitus-induced whisper of critical reverence.
Prior to their 1991 tour de force, My Bloody Valentine had one disavowed mini-album and the transformative Isn’t Anything to their name. With Loveless, Shields elevated his exploration of feedback’s original sin to a place where the primal was firmly a thing of beauty. Over recording sessions totalling a reported £250,000 the reclusive genius managed to abandon the coarse anthemics of his contemporaries Ride and Slowdive for a bittersweet symphony that remains unparalleled. It’s with a bleak sense of irony that old Kev must have accepted Sony’s request to trudge back to the studio and remaster his crowning achievement.
That Shields has attained sweet revenge over his macabre paymasters is indisputable. If delaying the project for a full four years since its first reviews were published wasn’t enough, the lack of dramatic difference between the original and reissue is an absolute triumph. Having been finessed in extreme slow motion, the resulting album has neither been polished to an inch of its life nor been subjected to the Raw Power treatment of slamming the distortion levels into overload. A cynic might even suggest that My Bloody Valentine’s legacy has only been enhanced by such ineffectual dithering. What’s the point in creating something new when you can further embellish your stratospheric stature of years gone by?
To those unfamiliar with Loveless, you’re in for something of a treat. The snare roll and subsequent wall of noise that hails the opening of ‘Only Shallow’ redefined alt-rock at the time and has utterly withstood popular culture’s subsequent ebbs and flows. Many a collective toyed with primal howls of distorted instrumentation before My Bloody Valentine but it’s a testament to their enchanting force that no-one has come close to impersonating them since. To carve a deeply affecting LP out of the same wretched sounds usually fit for three chords and a shouty man with a mohawk clearly takes way too much time and effort.
Since the whole album is essentially a sound collage with each song melting into the next, it’s a bit pointless to pick out a few best bits. The ethereal haze of ‘Blown A Wish’, the wistful crunch of ‘To Here Knows When’ and the fleeting euphoria of ‘Soon’ are all present but this is an album to savour from start to finish. One that reveals a different facet under each wave of its studiously created scuzz.
Naturally, Loveless has its blemishes. ‘Touched’ remains a curio of flaccid synth and nonsense moans from an aching guitar. ‘Sometimes’ drags its muddy fuzz on for an absolute age. This reissue even comes with a second bonus disc which is a remaster of the album from its original master tapes. It sounds nigh on identical to the first disc.
For a record where so much toil was exacted on smoothing over its bruises, it’s these disfigurements that make Loveless so endearing. To claim that My Bloody Valentine went in pursuit of perfection and found it betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of this immense band. It’s their flaws which make them so transcendent.
- DiS does Primavera Sound 2013
- DiS does Primavera 2013 - Who To See?
- Gourlay Files: Clash of the Titans - Sigur Ros vs My Bloody Valentine
- My Bloody Valentine - m b v
- First listen: 24 hours with mbv
- Gourlay Files: My Bloody Valentine @ Brixton Electric, 27/01/13
- Epic Win: 12 Days of DiSmas Giveaways!
- "We became seminal for doing nothing": DiS meets Debbie Googe of My Bloody Valentine
Decent review but...
...Sometimes is an absolute classic, and the brief instrumental is just that, an interlude. Far from being flaws these 2 tracks just cement what is unquestionably a classic album.
``‘Sometimes’ drags its muddy fuzz on for an absolute age.``
Get out. 'Sometimes' is the anchor of the whole album.
The two above me have already said it
but it's absolute heresy to accuse Sometimes of dragging on. It's an absolute gem.
'Sometimes' is incredible!!!!!
You sir, are a hideous buffoon! ;-)
"Sometimes" is many DiSer's idea of a 'perfect track'
See the thread. Touched is beautiful and would have been a great springboard as to where to go next.
Like with the Isn't Anything review........what does the remaster bring to the table???
C'mon DiS, we can read reviews of these albums anywhere. Cut to the chase and give us some info/insight into how these remasters actually sound. Is the bit about 'polishing' and a Raw Power comparison all we're getting?
Naturally, Loveless has its blemishes
Then surely it shouldn't get 10/10?
Totally agree...
...the point here is whether Kevin Shields' interpretation of the remastering is actually born out by listening to the two side by side. Does it add anything to the experience? Is it worth us avid fans shelling out for the two reissues or just the EP collection (as I have done). Amend your reviews!
again, echo the above
Loveless I have on vinyl and on CD. Why should I buy the remaster?
Is this a rhetorical question?
I don't think you need us to tell you the answer to this question!!
Sounds
Identical to the original to me.
Sometimes is fantastic all the way through
A mate used to say that it was the 'mirrorball and slow-dance' regular number at his usual indie-night haunt...I can picture the scene
This review should have been solely discussing the remaster. Both remasters.
The album is obv a 10/10 and the analog remaster isn't even mentioned... bleh.
Sometimes is the album's strongest track
however Touched is a bit silly, i can agree with you on that.
Sometimes is my favourite
on the entire thing. what buffoonery.
Slowdive
'Coarse anthemics'? Has this Robert Leedham person ever even heard Slowdive? What a cloth-eared idiot...
Actually, this article is so bad it almost unreadable. Not only is this person useless at evaluating music, his writing is absolutely awful, too.
Terrible review
Adds nothing, no fresh perspective, no mention of the sound, which is surely the only point of the remasters. "So endearing"? Please.
Can someone
who's listened to this on a decent stereo tell me whether there's any noticeable difference with the remaster? I know the music's great, and it's fine to review it for new people. But I'm more interested in details of the remaster itself.
That's a bit harsh.
I may not agree with the style of the review for a remaster, but let's not get prickish and unfairly personal on the writing, which is good.
The remasters are definite improvements on sound quality
Especially on Isn't Anything. My thoughts:
http://ludditestereo.net/2012/05/23/isnt-anything-loveless-and-eps-1988-91-reissues-my-bloody-valentine-album-reviews/



My Bloody Valentine
Drowned In Sheffield #14
DiS Does Singles 17.06.13: Dornik, Washed Out, AlunaGeorge
All Hail the Culturati... Fighting Over Radiohead's Hail to the Thief
Cutting Through the Noise: What it's really like representing new artists at events like The Great Escape
Arts & Crafts: Field Trip 2013 - The DiS Review
Live report The Stone Roses - Finsbury Park, London: 8th June 2013
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article