Sign In:
Login with Facebook
62829
Type: Album Release date: 06/09/2010
Your Rating:

You could probably bash off a moderately pointless thesis on why the alternative scene of the last decade has taken so little influence from the songwriting of Gary Barlow, when so much other Nineties pop - from Eurodance to R&B - has undoubtedly had an impact. I can’t be bothered to think the thing through properly, but I suppose you’d probably conclude that Barlow’s best work is more classic songcrafting in a Sixties/Seventies vein than intrinsically of its time, while the overwhelming majority of boyband music – including, let’s be honest, most of Take That's material – was anodyne bilge that still lives on in the various projects of Simon Cowell.

Still, considering the sheer popularity of Take That, East 17, Boyzone, Let Loose, 911 etcetera etcetera, it would seem peculiar if we saw no trace of them at all in this generation’s magpie-eyed hipsters. And lo! On the 6th of September was released Happiness, by Hurts.

Now, on the extreme offchance you’re in Theo Hutchcraft and Adam Anderson’s marketing department, you may be looking at the above and screaming “NO! EIGHTIES! DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH MONEY WE PAID TO MAKE THEM EIGHTIES? LOTS!”. True, the duo’s Sturmabteilung-chic and artful publicity shots – I’ll bet even their gigs are in monochrome – has gone an awfully long way towards convincing people that the duo are a throwback to the early New Romantic era. The pair do utilise Anderson’s synth as their chief instrument. And I doubt they’d have been turned away from The Blitz club, back in the day. But I’m sorry chaps: I lived through the Nineties, and no amount of fascist garb is fooling this child of Thatcher.

To be fair, the boyband Hurts most obviously recall are Savage Garden, the Aussie one synth/one singer duo who were clearly influenced by the New Romantics (‘To the Moon and Back’ being pretty much the best song Duran Duran didn’t write). But as with Savage Garden, the Eighties flourishes are just that. The bands Hurts hark to visually – Tears for Fears, early Depeche Mode and Human League, Visage, The Associates – were genuinely in love with the possibilities of synthesisers, and also boasted singers with weird-bordering-on-unique voices. Hurts, by contrast, offer something much tamer, albeit not without an occasional sense of drama. Happiness opener ‘Silver Lining’ begins with a promisingly dissonant electronic growl, which recedes soon enough to allow some big, stately, glock-like synths in. It sounds pretty awesome until Hutchcraft makes his entrance, his voice pure Barlow/Harvey/Hayes soul-lite as he declares “there’s a storm on the streets but you still don’t run” with all the gravitas of a Chihuahua. The little sob in his voice as he reaches the bridge line of “rain’s gonna follow you wherever you go” would surely have Louis Walsh dabbing at his eyes.

Anyway, this is all reading a bit negatively. ‘Wonderful Life’ is good stuff, the big, booming backing bed flattering Hutchcraft’s vocals, its bombastically atmospheric instrumental breakdown – with just a hint of ‘Careless Whisper’ sax – pretty sexy. It’s not as good as ‘Wonderful Life’ by Black, but... y’know. ‘Evelyn’ is probably the next best thing, a slow, martial build to a vaguely unsettling chorus of “stay with me Evelyn, don’t leave me with the medicine” before Anderson is let off the hook to blast out a load of sturm und drang electrical noise. ‘Better Than Love’ has a lovely fizzy, twinkly keyboard line reminiscent of Muse’s ‘Bliss’ and boasts by far Hutchcraft’s strongest performance on the record.

But then ‘Blood, Tears & Gold’ really is full on boyband territory, a watery swing-style verse leading into a “never let you down bay-be, bay-be” chorus that was just built for Westlife to get up off their stools for. ‘Sunday’, ditto (sample lyric: “we both know love is not that easy, I wish I’d known that it would be this hard to be alone”), though it does have a decent hi-NRG syth line. 'Stay' has a gospel choir. ‘Devotion’ has Kylie Minogue. None of it is desperately fun, the music thin, the embellishments desperately gauche.

I suppose there are two ways of looking at this band. One is that Hurts are actually trying to sound how they look, and just haven’t pulled it off, and could possibly do with a better singer. The other is that they’ve never listened to a Cabaret Voltaire record in their lives and the styling is all a ploy to get the hipster kids on board. Either way, Happiness promises the rough edges and absurdity of one era’s pop, but for the most part gives the mum-friendliness of the next. Hurts would surely be better if they committed to one or the other: either a genuinely enjoyable electro-pop act, or a band capable of sloughing their trendy trappings to the point they could write a song as transcendentally earnest as ‘Back For Good’ or ‘Stay Another Day’. For now they are, in essence, a couple of slightly confusing men dressed as Nazis.

they look like

Bros

This review almost makes out like pop is a bad thing?

My parents got a dose of the album when i was on holiday and both enjoyed it.

plus these guys have been trying to make it in various different guises for the last 5 or 6 years and i applaud them for their tenacity and scoring a duet with Kylie.

It's better than Westlife but not as good as Depeche Mode, as expected, MOR.

Junior Boys-lite

Although Wonderful Life is real nice.

I don't think it's so much that as the general acceptance...

...and willingness to be classified as something they are not.

Mr Lukowski

i really enjoy reading your reviews.

@icedpaul pop's a great thing

but I don't think the boyband era was responsible for a huge amount of great or even particularly definitive pop. Take That undisputedly have at least ten or so good to great songs, and most of the other big ones (bar Westlife) had a couple each, but there was a lot crap was essentially flogged on grounds of the performer's looks/personality. I mean, I wonder how much back-catalogue any of those bands sell now..?

But I think it's utter bollocks to suggest that Hurts in any way consitute a fun electro pop act - there's fuck all joie de vivre to their music, the singer's voice is simpery and bland, and they only really become close to fun when the synth dude is allowed to go OTT, which isn't often enough.

I enjoyed your slightly piss-taking review

and rhyming 'Evelyn' with 'medicine' is pretty wretchedly unforgivable. To the guy applauding them for "trying to make it in various different guises for the last 5 or 6 years" - you're applauding them for desperately and cynically morphing into whatever's popular and sells... In that case, they may as well be Westlife as the reviewer suggests. And they do look like Bros.

Interesting review,

although it's not really a surprise that there's no Nineties boyband influences in modern pop music. The review kind of talks itself out of that view before it grew any legs anyway.

I can't wait till the 80's revival / influence has passed, for me it's the worst era of popular music. Sure, there were tunes but the legacy seems nothing more than an image and the sound of a synth which is the depth that Hurts have skimmed. The difference is that we put up with that level of pop music shallowness in the 80's for two reasons - it was the prevalent attitude of society - hedonistic, materialistic, temporary; and the tunes were great. We've grown up to expect more now, pop music is often innovative of sound, original in many ways and generally presented futuristic rather than retro.
Hurts are a record label panic signing. 'Every-one's going 80's, let's get us an 80's bandwagon driver'. Fashion has a lot to answer for at times.

I think you misunderstand the review

It's saying they could be fine if they committed fully to pop but that all the phony artiness prevents them from doing so.

@Alcarez

this

A brilliant review!

This is by far the best Hurts review I have read so far. Although I must say that I really like the album - almost every track on it is a very well-crafted pop song, despite banal lyrics. They really should have left Blood, Tears And Gold out though.

@El-Goodo

We've been on the '80's bandwagon' for a very long time now and I'm beginning to think it's becoming almost like the new 60's in terms of it's ever present influence over artists. It can't be considered as a passing phase because it was all over high street fashion and music when I was at uni almost ten years ago. It's not going away and there are a number of very promising 80s revivalists in the pipeline still. See The Detachments whose album is released this month and whose material so far has been golden.

More please.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon