Home / Reviews / Albums /
Battles: EP C/B EP
Let’s be fair, absolutely so: this is not performance, this is not live; this is a recording, shorn of the alarming visuals that so dominate a Battles show. These are the bare bones, the equations and arithmetic, of what goes into a startling, pulse-arresting gig experience. These are songs that are gifted great life when delivered without the opportunity of retakes, without the comfort of starting over; thus, to someone – anyone – that has seen the splendour of these four men in complex rhythmic harmony, these songs seem cold, lifeless, too clever for their own damn good.
Of course, the moments of magic sparkle just as brightly as they do when they’re conjured so wonderfully before disbelieving eyes: ‘Tras’ may be one of the band’s earliest compositions, released before either EP B or EP C, the two five-trackers that comprise all but two songs of this compiled re-release, but it’s still fantastic. With a bassline that hip-hop producers would duel at dawn for, the song’s evolution-by-way-of-repetition progression winds the listener up into a ball of energy so very tight that it’s a wonder one’s lungs can still operate; the one downer of the piece is that it ends without the climax necessary to release such pent-up dancefloor potential. ‘B+T’, opener of EP C, is also magnificent: it chimes and charms, twists and turns, sounding in every way like the score to the 1980s Care Bears movie if it were re-imagined for our times of worry and woe by Darren Aronofsky. Its rainbows are bleedings their colours, everything blending into a Plasticine-hued mess, arching over a skyline of silver towers topped by cigar-chuffing fat cats. The tracks from EP C – it’s tough to refer to these pieces as songs in any strict sense, seeing as they rarely adhere to any conventional structural blueprints – generally better those from the standalone release’s predecessor; indeed, a couple of EP B efforts are, frankly, twaddle. ‘Bttls’ might think very highly of itself – all 12-and-some minutes of itself – but to anyone without the patience of a saint it’s roughly ten minutes too long.
Of course, most people buying this discography to date will be doing so either because of the live shows, or because they already know it to be to their eclectic tastes. They won’t be disappointed in the slightest – Battles push toward and beyond boundaries as easily as you or I tie our laces in the morning – but any passing trade should tread carefully through these twelve tracks (across two discs). One man’s passion is another man’s poisson, after all, and while Battles’ on-stage output is rarely worth any less than a maximum star-or-whatever rating, this release isn’t quite.
-
Funknuts?
"and while Battles’ on-stage output is rarely worth any less than a maximum star-or-whatever rating"
Hmmm. I must hasten to disagree there sir. On the basis of their Brighton gig last week, I wouldn't know what rating to give or indeed, if any rating system could acurately compound the sheer weirdness of seing them live. Maybe it was a bad show, with nothing to compare it to I wouldn't know, but here is my little review:
Band very slowly set-up, multiple cheers for the drummer setting up a rather higher than usual crash cymbal. (gimmick anyone?)
First track is a stop-start funky rhythmical tune, really pumping towards something; something that never happens and the tune limps along within its own repetition.
Second track. See above. With more free-jazz noodling.
So two tracks in and then something seems to go wrong. What it is is not communicated to the audience, who are forced to stand and watch the band nonchalantly swig beers and smoke fags for 15 minutes. Great.
The dude with the afro decides to do some glitch beatboxing to fill in for the lack of anything happening. A definite highlight.
Hooray, the gig restarts and now something is happening. Oh, its just the same song they played first. With more jazz noodling over the top. Respect to John Stanier, the guy is a sheer powerhouse. Shame he's stuck on repeat, like the rest of the band.
The last 20 minutes redeems the whole show by rocking out a medley of post jazz-funk n'bass that included the heaviest, fastest beat i've ever witnessed and that alone made the gig worthwhile. While I can see the potential these guys have to produce an epic live experience, on this evidence they have neither the songs nor the consistency to do so.
-
seriously...
...each and every time I've seen 'em in the flesh I have been awestruck.
-
awestruck
That's cool, perhaps I caught them on an off day. Still harbouring concerns about many tracks sounding very repetitive/full of meaningless noodling.
I was awestruck. But i also went through moments of 'this is utter shit'. The sporadic nature of the greatness was not enough to satisfy when i'd been led to believe by many that this would be an immense live 'experience'. The drumming towards the end was amazing.
I left the gig not knowing what to think/feel. I wasn't sure if i liked it,hated it, was inspired or what. It kind of blew my mind in the non-musical sense, so in that regard it was a good thing i guess.
-
battles are amazing live
tho i can see why people would be a bit perplexed. it's not songs in the conventional sense, it's more soundscapes that you have to immerse yourself within. i suppose it also helps if you know the songs before seeing them live as well :)
you didn't mention sz2 mr diver, which i think is easily battles' most impressive song and is the one they split in half in their live set as a kind of centrepiece. tut tut :p
-
Battles fucking rule
Repetition and rhythmic rigidity is the point of their music. People don't bag dance music for being repetitive. Battles are just dance music for the avant-garde-post-jazz-rock set.
-
Hear Hear
That Luminaire gig was by far and away the best thing I've seen all year. By a long long way. Transfixed from start to finish.
-
-
-
-

Comments
Post a new comment on this review