The problem with The Kooks isn’t that the songs they write are fantastically terrible or that their lyrics make them sound like a gaggle of gormless, macho bores with the sexual lustre and free will of a mechanical pigeon. No - theirs is a predicament that goes slightly deeper than that.
Waiting for the kettle to boil last night, my gaze fell upon a half-eaten tin of mushy peas. After a few seconds my eyes came to focus on the tin’s excitable logo and I realised that there are people out there who spend great quantities of their lives obsessing over how best to market those mushy peas, aspirant middle managers who put nights of sweat into PowerPoint presentations on which additives will give a better-than-ever flavour and texture to the luminous coagulate, haphazardly mixing business with pleasure as they cop a fumble off some budding bronze from HR at the toasting of quarterly success. Those people are doing a great service to society, performing month-upon-month a role that the majority of us would, at best, collapse into a twitching, headblown mess at and for that I salute them.
Similarly, I understand that these people don’t want to go home after a hard day at the office and listen to Liz Bougatsos wail her way through ‘God’s Money Vii’ or wait for Fuck Buttons’ ‘Bright Tomorrow’ to unfold in all its Technicolor glory. They want easy melodies to hasten escape from the dreary, the pointless and the mundane, their pop fix to forget about the array of e-numbers and the test samples of bean-bound gloop filling gaps between molars and that’s where things like The Kooks and Hollyoaks are supposed to come in – doing a job just a sidestep away from tedium, a breeze of interest in a desert of pointlessness. What’s puzzling about Konk though is that it’s taken being an utter non-entity to potentially perilous new extremes, frontman Luke Pritchard disappearing into a black hole of self-absorption that makes talking about his band or his band’s latest record rather difficult, like attempting to masturbate over corrugated cardboard, proof-read a mollusc, or, indeed, retain enthusiasm about your career when its success depends on selling tins of MUSH! at 39p a pop.
To ever stretch a point, The Kooks have just enough stodge to justify their position as the mushy peas of rock music in 2008. On the most part, Konk is just unremarkable, but occasionally it veers into areas where it really shouldn’t be, like a herd of drama school kids singing (because they’re always fucking singing, or skipping, or trying to make the impartation of some unnecessary knowledge sound like the Gettysburg address. “Fourscore and seven years ago, people like me would’ve been taken out to sea and tortured. Now, we haf takens over da UK music biz 4 ril, yes?” The Kooks went to drama school, by the way. Not that you could ever tell, with leather jackets and perms like that) show tunes through a dark alleyway in Elephant and Castle. One such moment comes with ‘Do You Wanna’ – note the lack of a question mark – where the band unequivocally offer up their glands to their “favourite girl”s (“Do you wanna / do you wanna / do you wanna / make love to me?”) and ‘Mr Maker’ where Pritchard seems to skid clumsily into a dissection of institutional paedophilia (“he’s not a member of the Catholic church, the pastor of his town got sent down for dirt / he sees the boys from Sunday school, it’s hard to believe what he read in the morning news”).
These odd moments aside, it’s tempting to suggest that never before have a band – and a band who, let us remember, this writer awarded a generous 8/10 for their summery, tuneful debut – managed to nail mediocrity so definitely between its tired eyes. This in itself could represent some kind of logic-bending art-rock achievement if only that wasn’t such a risky venture, commercially.
This brings me on to the real problem with The Kooks. Such is the weight of value they’ve built up behind them amid rockist industry (essentially a practice whereby anxious fathers introduce ‘safe’ boyfriends to their daughters, steering them away from the 'black' rhythms of dance music and hip hop), that they’re clogging up all the holes where interest was occasionally allowed to flourish under the catch-all guise of ‘pop’. These mushy peas have nothing on the glorious banquet provided by acts even just slightly adrift in terms of sales, TV airtime and radio plays – the most immediate examples coming to mind are the new Mystery Jets and Wild Beasts albums, though you’d imagine the former won’t be complaining of a lack of attention come the year’s end. Even when admitting Hayden Thorpe’s feral, fungal howl would be lost on the majority of The Kooks’ fans, there are plenty more - The Maccabees, The Cribs, Black Lips all providing genuine pop / rock / indie Radio 1 guitar music thrills with recent work that is brushed aside as soon as the inexplicably lauded likes of The Kooks return with this dogshit excuse for an album. And, after all, perhaps this is the reason why those mushy pea workers deserve to take home more than mushy peas and why it’s necessary that The Kooks be exhaustively and terminally destroyed.
if it weren't
for the upsetting decision to compare The Kooks to Hollyoaks, I'd agree with this article entirely.
i live in elephant & castle
mad props!
Tom Clarke would despise you
Hollyoaks is even worse than the kooks
Zoe Carpenter > Luke Pritchard *100
.
Totally, sometimes a man just needs to vegitate.
Shooting fish in a barrel etc
But still thoroughly enjoyable :D
Yep
Fantastic opening paragraph. Good article.
i'd wager that working for "mush!" is a lot more rewarding than
a. writing these first three paragraphs of patronising, up-its-own-arse, humour and insight-free wank
b. being kev kharas in general
for the record, i neither like the kooks nor do i work a similar job; my observation that you're a cunt is one coming from an entirely neutral position, like switzerland.
Dad?
Score was obvious
But the review was actually very well justified and entertaining, thoroughly enjoyed that review Kev. Don't really think it's necessary for anyone to call you a 'cunt' because of it to be honest.
doesn't go far enough for me
i would have them tortured in public for crimes against music. even my radio starts barfing when it is forced to bear the noise. long live wanton hatred for the kooks.
I don't know
You build them up, then knock them down...
Poor lambs...
Totally didnt see this one coming!
Mr Kharas
If you think this is some kind of attonement for giving these cunts a 8/10 in the first place - thus contributing to the fact that this second record was even made then you are right.
But not much.
Also: mush
Why don't people in the North appreciate this word?
Hang on...
surely an "unremarkable" album that "occasionally veers" into worse areas should be a solid 4 or 5 out of 10? In fact, an album that "(nails) mediocrity right between the eyes" should be a 5 and nothing else.
That said,
I like the mushy peas analogy :)
'attempting to masturbate over corrugated cardboard'
hahaha
i do find the smooth cardboard
is easier on the eye for onanistic purposes
^ This ^
"proof-read a mollusc"
This was my favourite part of the review and I'm not sure why.
i don't think we should punish bands because stupid people like them.
that said, the kooks are FUCKING SHIT.
I
really, really like this review. But the score does seem a little incongruous.
its that old argument
'its better to be rubbish than mediocre'
if they album had just been BAD than that might have earned a better review. I think Kev's point is just that the album is 'meh'...and therefore deserves the minumum score.
Going from an 8/10 to a 1
I knew it was gonna be bad, but i was expecting it to be given more like a 4.
A Very Entertaing read.
Also, would just like to say
that 'Konk' might just be the worst album title in a long while
Stadium Arcadium?
One presumes
they are referring to the Ray Davis-owned recording studio of the same name. I don't write much because I find it nigh on impossible to do great writing about mediocre bands. Such music gets me so depressed about the world that I dry up. This is GREAT writing, because KK does exactly what I find so difficult.
On the Kooks... though there will be always space for pop that lets you escape from your drab working day, what is frustrating about the 'indie' pop world is that it's so fucking comformist and ultra conservative. Pop has NO rules, no self righteous genre-fans to satisfy, and so long as you can write a memorable tune people can sing along to...ANYTHING goes. Great pop is a truly greast thing. Mushy Peas like the Kooks, far from being somehow cooler than the R&B world are actually a billion times shitter... Britney, Riyanna, Usher etc. are MUCH better than this!
You....
speaketh the truth...
I agree with much of that
their debut WAS good, but somehow more of it is just hugely unncessary. And they were shitting awful on Jools Holland the other week.
(the cardboard/mollusc bit made me snort loudly incidentally. Thanks)
It's a pleasant change
(the review), from the 7/10 that everything else seems to get.
first album
- great in parts. 7 or 8 ex10. they had melodies, they held promise of maturing.
this one:
- corporate as all hell.
3/10.
But really, it's the words that drive the final nail. Mr Maker = hilarity x unintentional hilarity.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
My Metaphor counter is going haywire. Got pretty bored after a few words. I got the general jist though.
Basically: there's an evil conspiracy that stops ugly nerd bands that only Drowned in Sound readers will ever give a fuck about getting anywhere in the charts, but supports evil music like The Kooks.
"and why it’s necessary that The Kooks be exhaustively and terminally destroyed."
Eww. Grow upwards.
havent heard
the album, don't really care tbh. The kooks have always supplied me with mild entertainment especially when they were getting the piss taken out of them by Simon Amstell. For that, i think there existence is justified. No one who really cares about music takes them seriously so i feel they are pretty irrelevant.
Yeah, pretty much.
I think you're beautiful, though.
1/10
is so correct it makes me happy.
I don't think.......
.......I'll stop laughing all day. Thank you. Great writing.
this review pretty much sums up me feelings about this album.
which is odd, because their first album was decent/pretty good at most. but not this album just sounds like a band(or maybe just luke) with its collective head so far up its ass. such self-absorption is somewhat pathetic.
p.s. kev, it's good to see that someone shares my sentiment about the cribs. which may in fact be the first "indie" band ever devised. such a title is not a good thing by any means.
There's always a place for the kooks
Just like Jose Gonzalez... my mum can enjoy it. Not everyone has to like complicated music, plenty of people enjoy Oasis.
And there's always a sense of togetherness listening (and singing along) to a mediocre pop song. It's hard to be offended or to like it either way. Deserves a 4/10
Not something I'll be listening to, mind.
if you enjoyed this review you are a twat
and represent all that's wrong with DiS. self importance is ugly.
I'm with you on that
I don't like the Kooks music, but this review reeks of "OMG, I can't liek teh popular musix, I'm way too indi 4 dat"
Agreed
If it's just average then why get so emotional about it?
I like the fact that he mentioned his previous 8/10 review before someone could use it against him.
But are they...
... worse than The Feeling? I would say that is not possible, because I REALLY hate The Feeling. Though not as much as Razorlight...
i actually thought the first album
had moments and was a good tuneful record as the writer of this review admitted. I am not their biggest fan at all but yes they have been murdered by being played to death on commercial radio but 1/10 would represent a record with no ideas, nothing whatsoever going for it and actually being plain unlistenable, perhaps a record by the likes of Westlife or Robson and Jerome? Whilst I dont really rate what I have heard from the new record and won't be buying it - it does not warrant a 1/10 score and the reviewer has let his feelings or dislike for this band to get in the way of a fair and impartial review. I also thought the mushy peas analogy was contrived.
i agree with all of those who say a mediocre record
should be 5 or 6/10 and from what I have heard thats what this record represents. It's the quality of reviews like this that explain why DiS is rarely name checked on promotional material or ads for artists - why it it always Q magazine, The Guardian or the independent or NME that are quoted? It only seems anyone attaches a DiS biggup when no one else has given them a good review...
The average person on the street
would not have heard of drowned in sound, whereas they will have heard of or bought the others. Surely that is more important for advertising than the quality of the reviews.
very poor review
This review pretty much sums up all the things that really irritate me about DiS. I couldn't tell a Kooks track from any other similar Radio 1 indie types but why bother to even write about an album if you think that success and formal musical training precludes you from making anything meaningful?
..
Because all you saps sit here talking about it. There's plenty of glowing reviews published on here every day that all will happily turn there noses at to instead jabber away about this prize turd.
sorry pal
but poor journalism is poor journalism and has to be flagged up as such. When it's good it receives fitting feedback too.
So
you only buy an album if one of the publications you've listed gives it a good score?
what?
who would even have a tin of mushy peas lying around? what is this, the depression?
that
was MY first thought!!! hhahahah
They're just a bunch of working class lads singing real songs made by real people...
... or is that someone else?
they are
shit now cuz they dont have Max. He was a big force in the song writing process for their debut.
AMAZING
I love The Kooks... honest.. not a bad word against them!!
Has anyone heard of The Hot Melts?? they kinda sound like The Kooks... really great sound!!
yeah, my friend is the bassist
Its not at all suprising that they sound like the kooks considering they share a manager. So yeah, you like the kooks, then the hot melts are a safe bet.