Drowned in Sound

Search



Neutral Milk Hotel On Avery Island

Neutral Milk Hotel: On Avery Island (Reissue)

21 votes
?
by Alex Denney

From the official website: “Jeff has been working on a collection of short stories. He also just joined the circus and wants to make a movie about snails.

The latter’s a joke, no doubt, but it’s a barbed one all the same, acknowledging a weight of expectation surrounding Neutral Milk Hotel that has not lifted since the release of their second and final opus, In The Aeroplane Over The Sea, in 1997.

That record’s begun its inexorable journey into the rock canon now, garlanded retrospectively by critics and fans alike as one of the best of all time, but for devotees frustrated by the band’s ongoing hiatus it’s to the past and On Avery Island they’ve had to look, and it's a remarkable work that tells an intriguing story of its own.

To contextualise: Neutral Milk Hotel were the crowning achievement of the Elephant 6 Recording Company collective, a motley crew of like-minded musicians largely based around Athens, Georgia sharing a love of ‘60s pop, folk, noise and Syd Barrett’s influential brand of cracked psychedelia.

Essentially the solo project of enigmatic singer-songwriter Jeff Mangum, the band’s history can be traced through noise rock beginnings in Mangum’s LA hometown onto transitional incarnations featuring soon-to-be members of The Apples (In Stereo; Robert Schneider) and The Olivia Tremor Control (Bill Doss), before finally settling on the four-piece line-up that spawned a masterpiece in Aeroplane.

On the face of it at least, On Avery Island is a shakily-executed solo venture, an electrified ramble intermittently backed by a loose-knit collective including Schneider, Lisa Janssen (bass) and Rick Benjamin (trombone).

But if musically the record is as crude a vehicle for Mangum’s poetic smarts as Bob Dylan’s early electric forays were for his own precocious harangues, lyrically its aim is unnervingly true.

For all that, On Avery Island’s principal joy is that it confirms absolutely its successor’s mastery. Like William Blake with a dirty mouth, Mangum’s a flaming visionary, the opacity of his verse outweighed by the sheer visceral force of his grotesque repertoire of images, rendered with fever-dream intensity.

His words are arguably as pungent and profound as anything produced by Dylan in his ‘60s pomp, but here they’re necessarily diminished in scope: Mangum’s oeuvre stops wells short of social critique, and while On Avery Island finds his modus operandi as a writer largely established, it would take the bizarre conceptual framework of Anne Frank’s diaries for history’s insensible march to impinge on his highly personal vision, and to devastating effect.

On Avery Island also lacks the soaring moments of clarity that punctuate its more distinguished younger sibling. It’s a record as bewildering as it is bewildered, stumbling around in the red mist of a sensual plane encompassing both a prepubescent horror of and fascination with sex, locating all the contradictions of human existence within loaded images like “Blistering Pree, all smiling and swollen / makes babies to breathe / with their hearts hanging out over the sheets / as soft as beets in some brown dresser drawer” (‘Baby Pree’). I’ve ended the quote there for brevity’s sake, but Mangum’s not finished; imagery spooling uncontrollably out with the unravelling horror of a schoolgirl that’s discovered her first period.

Too much information,” comes the inevitable riposte, but NMH are all about shining a light on the dark recesses of the sexual id, inhabiting a world that teems with images of venality, physical corruption and barely concealed castration fantasy (seriously, check out ‘Where You’ll Find Me Now’).

While his peers nailed their childlike colours to the wall as a declaration of aloofness from mainstream society, Mangum uses the standpoint of threatened innocence as a trope for what might loosely be defined as a religious quest; an attempt to reconcile the baseness of man with his sense of wonder at the world.

Desire is understood as both corrupting force and as the most basic expression of our incompleteness, which helps explain Mangum’s uncanny knack for making even the grossest of lines sound unbearably poignant: “I don’t wish to taste of your insides / or to call out your name through my phone / for the glory boys at your bedside will love you / as long as you’re something to own.”

If there’s a single major flaw to be had with On Avery Island, it’s that Mangum doesn’t always succeed in communicating the urgency of his vision. The agitated fog of distortion that permeates barely rouses Mangum’s voice above an injured whine, which gets you to wishing he’d holler himself hoarse like on Aeroplane. Likewise the bleeding-fingertip strum of that record is largely absent, although the excellent ‘Baby Pree’ gets closest to nailing both these traits.

Other standouts on an album that’s musically solid but fairly forgettable include the sad-sack tumble of ‘Song Against Sex’, greatly assisted by Benjamin’s queasy fills of trombone, and the affecting vocal melody evidenced on ‘Gardenhead/Leave Me Alone’.

To return briefly to the Dylan analogy, perhaps On Avery Island is best thought of as NMH’s Another Side Of, an embryonic record (to use a Mangum-esque image) that points the way to greatness while stopping short of that accolade itself. With the reissue including two bonus tracks comprising the early ‘Everything Is’ single, this is an essential document of a band whose time came inexplicably too soon. Probably.

  • Neutral Milk Hotel 7 / 10

uh no

this record is lifechanging, but it's not the Anne Frank record like Alex wrote. that's Aeroplane which is even more lifechanging


that's not what he said

read it properly.


or

they could just make annoying, pompous music...


the film isnt a joke

pitchfork had pictures from it last week...


Wow

A 7? You must be an idiot. This is much more like a 9, and Aeroplane is a 10. Not many bands produce an album as good as On Avery Island, never mind Aeroplane.


^ times a million

a 7 is an insult, this is lursh


i'll tell you a secret

when it comes to rating stuff like this: it's all relative.

now move along.


Let me tell you a secret.

You're wrong.


zzz


If you can't get behind a 9

on this, then your reviewing skills must be called into question. Even the 12-minute drone that ends the album is eerie and poignant. For all the talk indie kids do about how drone/noise is art (no really dude, it is, Wolf Eyes rule), Pree Sisters Swallowing a Donkey's Eye has moved way more people than any of the pretentious drone/noise crap that is usually praised by reviewers. And that's just the drone piece on the album. Anyone who calls this album "embryonic" is obviously an immature and inexperienced reviewer. On Avery Island is a fully realized masterpiece with its own mood, style, and agenda independent of Aeroplane, in the same way that MBV's Isn't Anything is a fully realized masterpiece with its own mood, style, and agenda independent of Loveless. If there was no Aeroplane and there was no Loveless, On Avery Island and Isn't Anything would still be great albums, and no one would ever suggest that they hinted at unfinished business. The fact that there were superior followup albums to On Avery Island and Isn't Anything was completely unlikely and unexpected, truly two of the great miracles in rock music. So when listeners are blessed twice instead of once, it behooves reviewers to not punish the artist in question by calling the previous masterpiece a warmup. Get a clue, kids.


zzzz

One more for you.


Thank you

for confirming that the Dis is asleep on the job.


Make that

"DiS staff"


No worries

Pleased to be of service.
(I wish I was fast asleep.)


alright

fair enough and that, but i take issue with words like 'inexperienced', 'immature' and 'idiot': musically the album's not a patch on the follow-up, and likewise it lacks that record's scope. therefore: several notches down from greatness, but that hardly constitutes a slagging, does it?


On Avery Island lacks Aeroplane's scope

because it deliberately focuses on a more personal kind of pain. Aeroplane takes personal pain and tries to make sense of it in a universal way. Both albums have amazing songs with Jeff Mangum's blood all over them, but yeah, Aeroplane is better. Not MUCH better but better. And really, I would say that the thing that makes Aeroplane a little better is the way that Mangum chooses to deal with that album's central conflict-it has little to do with the actual songcraft or performances. If you have a pulse and you are interested in indie rock, both should move you deeply. I don't know how to make you feel something you are not feeling, but I guess a 7 for this album further reinforces my belief that empathy will eventually become extinct. So there, if it's not your fault, then you are simply a product of the human race's evolution towards being heartless animals. That said, if I were you, I would embrace "idiot," "immature," and "inexperienced."


Oh please...

Next you'll be saying that Marnie Stern is A-MAY-ZING. ;o)


Thanks

for bringing her up. Once again, everyone, In Advance of the Broken Arm was the best album released in 2007, and DiS chose to ignore it.


No, it's not.

And if you think that, you would be the only reviewer I know of with that opinion.


And that would be a lie, wouldn't it...

...unless every reviewer you know is Frances Morgan.


No.

I read a lot reviews on a lot of sites and in magazines. I even went ahead and checked Metacritic before I typed that. There was one review there that was below a 7 (a 5) and even that would not equate with "horrible." So yes, that would make you the only reviewer that I know of with that opinion (that is if you have actually heard the album and that really is your opinion of it).


I have the album right here

True story. It's a perfect record for wet indie boys with few social skills and wank fantasies about hot ladies with fret licks, don't get me wrong, but if a man was playing that shit, it'd be summarised as such: shit. Compositionally erratic, lacks charm and heart, she's an awful vocalist... but HEY, it's on Kill Rock Stars and Plan B totally dig it and she's playing BARDEN'S OMG and it's sold under 200 copies in the universe bravo... it's a fucking great album.


Ha, ha.

Okay Mike, whatever, but for the record, I didn't even know what she looked like when I initially went to her My Space on the basis of the score I saw on Pitchfork. Anyway, you obviously don't get it (the charm and heart comment seriously undermined your credibility), but I find it awfully funny that someone supposedly well-versed in unconventional music would describe someone's music as "compositionally erratic." Equally suspect is the lingering fact that there still has not been a formal review of the album published on the site (You know-put up or shut up. What is there to fear? The coolness police?). I can't speak for the U.K., but over here the album has done rather well. A lot of people came out to see her play in March and July in Austin. But that's irrelevant of course because we're talking about indie rock here, and so the issue for you ought never be whether an album is popular or not but whether it is good (particularly if you have a strong view one way or the other). In Advance of the Broken Arm has been critically acclaimed thus far, so it necessarily demands your attention as a reviewer. Marnie Stern happens to have a decent following on the DiS music board, some of which is comprised of people whose opinions I know you respect. So why not publish a review? Scared of further alienating your readers?


'a decent following' = about 20, 30 people

Said few do not our readership equal. Thanks for your comments. Enjoy the 'holidays'.
x


That was such a cute reply

that I almost didn't notice how you sidestepped almost all of my questions. How courageous.


I am twinkle-toed

If you wanna chat, send me a note; I'll save this comment space for others.


This album

IS AMAZING. I always thought it would be a bit alright after Aeroplane so I was surprised when I heard it. Strange you don't hear more about it really


Hahahahahaha

Sticking the knife in one of indie's sacred cows is always funny. Thing is, the review isn't even that negative, but you just know that any review with Neutral Mlik Hotel in the title and anything less than a 9 in the score box is going to generate howls of sanctimonious anguish. I've no great emotional investment in NMH like most people seem to have, so I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that Aeroplane is probably the nastiest sounding record in my collection; seriously, for a record held in such reverence it sounds FUCKING HORRENDOUS.


Fair play

If I'd bought this first, I never would've bought Aeroplane - and I love Aeroplane, but this is just too patchy.


The DiS messageboarders have jumped the shark.

I remember when this site's comments were GOOD.


I can't !

When was it ?


Please explain:

Why is DiS reviewing re-releases? Surely it's a bit pointless?


It's a new tactic.

"We are out of touch with what new bands readers might care about, so let's talk about some old ones."


OR

It's re-released for a reason, to garner warranted publicity. And here is some. Wicked. LOADS of people will never have read about this album 'til now.


And they may walk away misinformed.

Way to be responsible.


...

Sorry dad.


So...

only dads care about reliable reviews? And I thought my country was weird.


Subjectivity

Clearly isn't a word you're familiar with.


Oh I am.

It's just that there are some absolutes, and Neutral Milk Hotel is a perfect example.


you're going to run out of blue box

to talk absolute shit in


ha ha ha


no offence mike but

you can't really go on about subjectivity and then go on about how objectively shit you appear to think this Marnie Stern person is. (I haven't heard her btw)
However, people are being idiots in my opinion by saying giving this a 7 has made you less of a human being or whatnot - very silly really.


Are you confused?

My opinions = subjective comments.
It's not like I'm pulling out graphs indicating how poor artist XYZ is/isn't.

x


yes, probably

I think I misread what you were saying.

On an off-note, XYZ graphs and shiz are called analytic truths.
Statements like "the sky is blue" are called synthetic truths.
...
Moral Philosophy is fun.


'fun' < 'Friends' on TV

Still. Oddly.


I kind of see your point

and I guess there aren't many new release at this time of year. I just really don't like the thing Pitchfork does where they review rereleased 'classic' albums all the time; it just seems to be reviewers showing off how much they love certain tried-and-tested albums with all the security of hindsight and received wisdom. Reviews of new albums are exciting because the reviewer (and the readers) are all pretty much in the dark. I haven't really put my point across very well but there you go.

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/46634-unknown-pleasures-closer-still


errp.

...these are re-released records, not attempts at point gathering.


I never quite 'got' NMH

They're dull.





© DrownedinSound.com | From the Archive - Shady Bard: from fragility to fullness...