Sign In:

Pop Eats Itself: EMI Loses £180m But Stares At Warner Music

EMI Group plc, the music-based retail corporation today posted yearly drop in profits upwards of £180m, at the same time as announcing that it had made a 'firm offer' for the music arm of Warner Bros.

EMI attributed the massive drop in profits to the completion of debt restructuring programme, in addition to 'unprecedented levels of retailer de-stocking in Japan and a reorganisation in EMI Music Publishing'.

EMI is the parent of record labels such as Parlophone in the UK (Coldplay, Radiohead, Blur [through Food Records] ) and Capitol in the United States (Coldplay, Radiohead, Blur). Top of the EMI publishing division tree this year were Pink, Pharrell Williams, Alan Jackson, Sean Paul, Robbie Williams and Evanescence.

The company once again reiterated that: 'Both physical and online piracy continue to be a major problem for the industry. A flood of blank CDRs, mainly coming from Asia, has fuelled physical piracy in many parts of the world and is contributing to industry declines. In the online world, even though the US industry has shown a small decline in illegal file sharing as a result of industry action, online piracy continues to do massive damage.'

Whilst bemoaning the financial plight of the industry, the company confirmed that it had made a 'firm offer' for Warners. EMI Chairman, Eric Nicoli, added that discussions with Time Warner had 'progressed well' and were 'at an advanced stage'.


"We have made a firm proposal to Time Warner which, we believe, would create substantial value for the shareholders of both companies," he added.


The private offer is expected to value the whole of Warner Music - including its Warner Chappell music publishing arm - at about $2.5bn, reports added.

The move follows merger plans announced by Sony and BMG earlier this month.

To secure the deal, it is thought that EMI will have to offer Warners £1bn in cash.

We are aware that this story has nothing to do with music.

HORRAY! The Death of The Music Industry Continues.

...And now for a music industry that's completely different, fuelled by intelligent and creative working practises, which people throughout the world can sense the humanity and magic that goes into making and selling music as historical cultural documents (i.e. not just those lumps of plastic for 99p-£15.99)

In the shadows, brave things are happening....

DiScuss: What was the last truly exciting thing to happen in the corporate music world? What was the last event to burn a significant mark in the history books? Spicemania? 'Song 2'? 'Creep'?

Re: HORRAY! The Death of The Music Industry Continues.

Get in!!
That'll teach 'em to give £80m to an ageing overweight pantomime dame with a blown voice and *no* writing skills.
We'll win yet brothers! We're detuning our guitars and coming after you Cowell!
Mwah-hahaha!

i hope the lot folds

Haha, arrogant tossers arent they in 'the industry'. When we stop buying their over priced cds, its mp3 thats ruining it. Give us something we can afford to buy, with quality content and you know what, it might sell.
why do the suits have err such nice expensive suits? Looks like someone makes alot of 'dollar' innit.
Looks like M & S all the way now fat cats.

La la la

£1bn *in cash*? Wow. Will they have to be uncreased, non-consecutive £20 notes and everything?

Re: La la la

Make that uncreased, non-consecutive fivers, just to be sure. And get Robbie to count them.

Tarka Daal the otter


Uhuh. And MP3s destroy the world, were responsible for SARS, shot JFK and probably rape elderly citizens too. Fucking record company arse. Simply put: if you market your entire singles market at young people, with the majority of records aimed at the crowd who've just developed pubic hair, and you throw hideous amounts of money at short-term crap like the Pop Idol crowd, you lose money. Maybe you could look at the album buying crowd, y'know, the market that you actually make your profit on becuse you don't waste all dat cash on bullshit promotional work and shitty videos for MTV. If the music industry were running an Indian takeaway, they'd spend all their money on poppadums, give the curry and rice lip service and never, ever have any mango chutney. Fer sho'.

good words

now *thats* a nice analogy...

I blame the clocks going back

Seriously man, every time they go back, my sleep patterns get fucked up and I ended up turning into Kid Insomnia. The wife sleeps, I don't and the only source of sanity around 3am in Toronto is to write addled analogies involving balti houses.

Rape and pillage.

Personally my biggest worry is what sort of stuff the major labels are gonna pillage next for the single buying, musically-stunted poor misguided fools out there. but it's still nice to see that the pod people pop sensations which have been churned out like so much candy for the past few years are proving damaging to the corporate capital. another nail in the coffin i would hope.

Spock says '


Uhuh, and there are plans for the whole Pop Idol shite to get even bigger... hello enormous cash cow, goodbye all remaining sanity. Did anyone see this article on the BBC website?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3280429.stm

Now, what type of bands/groups do y' reckon release the greatest amount of filler? (Points for anyone who mentions Sonic Youth's 'A Thousand Leaves' LP). And what do most singles have? One song, a couple of remixes... and what market does the record industry aim at? So singles full of filler=don't sell=pretty shitty investment you'd think. The record industry clearly thinks differently.

I love the article though. Comparing Speakerboxxx to Springsteen... guffaw. Give me the future 'Napalm Death versus Wynonna Judd' article before i sneeze vermicelli everywhere.

YOUR TALKING SHIT!

EMI has nothing to do with short term evil pop music such as Pop Idol, Cowell, etc. They are one of few record companies that invest in long term artist development, building careers and amazing back catalogues in a wide range of musical areas. They also invest in innovation and are one of few companies who aren't afraid of trying new and challenging ideas. "The Clown" did'nt get 80m - stop reading tabloid's for morons. The media has misrepresented the facts time after time. GET THE FACTS RIGHT BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF YOUR CYNICAL ILL-INFORMED BIGOTED OPINIONS. O' and with regards to the sensationist headline, EMI have made profits, not losses. The people who work at EMI are dedicated people who love music, they work very long hours supporting musician's and performers careers, so back off and stop knocking them. You sad, sad people.

Re: YOUR TALKING SHIT!

...you work for EMI, don't you?!!

maybe they didn't pay Robbie Williams £80 millon - but then to be honest, paying him 80p is too much.

fact is, the most exciting music around is on independent labels. i'd take the rosters of Domino, Secretly Canadian and Kill Rock Stars over EMI, Parlophone & Virgin or whatever anyday. sorry...

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon