Take the power back: musicians rally against labels
What do Radiohead have in common with Robbie Williams? They both want more control over the use of their music, and are joining the all-new Featured Artists' Coalition to campaign for artists' rights.
Essentially a trade union for musicians, one of the FAC's main aims is to ensure the ownership of recordings remains with the artist rather than their label. They propose the UK industry adopts the American model, where those rights are leased by the artist back to the label.
They're also concerned about the control (or lack of) that musicians have over the use of their music across the various digital channels like YouTube and Myspace.
Brian Message, who manages both Radiohead and Kate Nash - also a member - had this to say:
_> "It is time for artists to have a strong collective voice to stand up for their interests. The digital landscape is changing fast and new deals are being struck all the time, but all too often without reference to the people who actually make the music. The Featured Artists' Coalition will help all artists, young and old, well-known or not, drive overdue change through the industry in their interests and those of fans" _
Other members of the Featured Artists' Coalition include Billy Bragg, David Gilmour, Kaiser Chiefs and Iron Maiden.
- Peter Gabriel to release 'song swap' album with songs of Arcade Fire, Magnetic Fields + more
- No Surprises: Radiohead to carry on releasing albums after all
- Men more likely to download music illegally, but the girls shop around...
- Year 2000 - A Playlist of Songs Wot Soundtracked the Launch of DiS
- Thom Yorke 'denies' Banksy video link-up, or perhaps not...
- Lily Allen vs. Radiohead vs. Patrick Wolf vs. The Man
- Thom Yorke confirms new singles, announces video premiere
- Leeds 2009: The DiS review Pt. 1
From the archive
-
No More Kings: The Last Of Michael Jackson, II - a playlist
-
Top Breeders, recommend it: DiS gets chummy with Kim Deal
-
In Photos: Swn Festival Day Two
stick it to the man
and what not
is the fact
that someone manages radiohead and kate nash a bit weird, or am i just being stupid? shurely they would have quite different management needs?
so artists want major labels
to both pay for and give them copyright over their records?
lolz
It's a bit ironic
that the Fat Dancer is part of this considering photographers wanting to photograph him on his last tour had to sign a contract giving him copyright of their photos - http://www.stockphototalk.com/phototalk/2006/07/german_newspape.html
Kate Nash - also a member.
ho ho ho
Brainlove have used "the AMerican model" since day one.
It never seemed right to me to take copyrights.
Also,
I have to say, major label bands who do this are hypocrites, as their success is a result of the system they are attacking.
plus
one would imagine you're not loaning bands several hundred thousand pounds to make the record on the first place...
I guess the bigger artists just add credence to the whole thing
I doubt it would have as much of an impact if bands on smaller labels were demanding it. It might be common practice among smaller labels, as John_Brainlove mentions below but maybe if an artist signs to a major they have to give up certain rights. I think it's good that someone is looking out for future artists if anything.
no....
...how's so music is a product, when it comes to managment - know your product, mange it.


Radiohead
Robbie Williams
Kate Nash
In Photos: Monotonix @ Hector's House, Brighton
In Photos: The Specials @ Hammersmith Apollo, London
In Photos: Camden Crawl Launch Event @ The Blues Kitchen, London
In Photos: La Roux @ Shepherds Bush Empire, London
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article