Sign In:
Login with Facebook
82337

Live Review: Lambchop @ The Barbican, London - 02/03/12



Time passes slowly when you're with Lambchop. Listening to their suburban hymns, you're side by side with Kurt Wagner as he sits around of a morning, brewing his coffee as the clock ticks and tocks; maybe walking the dog, and stopping for a while to consider what the neighbours are up to; heading into town, watching the quality of the light change as the morning drifts towards the afternoon. His band ambles along amiably in his wake, a quiet group with their strong foundations and humble embellishments, sometimes at an almost inaudibly low volume. The drums shuffle, the bass strides, the lap steel ripples and slides. Their songs meander along, but always with purpose; like a spry old gentleman going about his daily routine.

As such, Lambchop has an entirely different feel to most modern music. There's no high drama here. No howling broken-heartedness or craven lust, hatefulness or anger, or overt strong emotions of any kind. These songs are concerned with the other moments that make up a life: observing and expressing the mundanity of everyday experience. Wagner knows it: "I just realised something," he drawls, between two ten minute songs, "this song sounds... just like all the other songs." It's this kind of assured self-awareness that enables him to write how he does; the knowledge that there's meaning in the familiar. There's comfort here, and an undercurrent of satisfaction with one's lot.

This isn't to say Wagner's writing is prosaic - he slips in barbs amongst the baubles. "It's not how much you make / but how much you earned" goes one memorable couplet, connecting directly for a moment with that commonly held frustration at the financial systems of the West. On another song, he briefly plays the country crooner, as the stage is washed in pink light: "I had never been in love before / and I realised I needed nothing more" sounds odd sung in that wizened croak of a voice. But like everything Wagner turns his hand to, it works.

For most of the set, culled largely from their current LP Mr. M, we barely see his face. He sits side on to the crowd, twitching in that distinctive way as he plays - like a puppet having his strings jerked at unexpected moments. There's the odd flashed glance from beneath the shadow of his cap's peak, of the odd gleam of a tooth as he throws back his head to sing. But if you really want to see the detail of Kurt Wagner, it's all there, laid plain in the persuasive honesty of his songs.

8/10

They were very good, but the setlist was rather indulgent for me. You know what to expect with them, but if I wanted to pretty much exclusively listen to the new album I would put it on the stereo. There should have been more for the audience, a few surprises.

Yeah

My opinion on that is that they've earned their stripes: but yeah, people in the crowd would have, as always, liked a couple of 'hits'.

Agreed - I'm not bemoaning the fact that they didn't play 'Up With People', but the fact that leaning almost solely from the new album means a lack of variety. I like to be in suspense wondering what will come next. They have a wonderful back catalogue, don't think they should be afraid to use it.

I guess basically I can't criticise them for playing what they wanna play.

But rather, listen, enjoy what they have decided to do, and comment on it in the review. I don't get to pick the setlist and I'm not gonna moan it wasn't what I wanted: I enjoyed the show, I respect their decision to play the new album, and that's that.

Time to move guys, Nixon was over a decade ago

What is is with DOS & the obsession with sodding Nixon. Would people go & see Radiohead & moan they didn't play anything off The Bends?

It's been a long long time since Nixon, and anyone paying attention knows they've not released another record like it since, and almost never sound like it in concert. Most of the time they're quiet & reserved these days & have been for years, it really shouldn't have come as shock. It wasn't going to sound like Merge XX as that was very much a one off and they haven't toured with the horn section in yonks.

No suprises? Courtney's vocals certainly were, as was sounding the most country they have in a long long time. Plus we got Cowboy on the Moon & a georgous Dylan cover. The take on the Mr M songs was equisite, and there's plenty of variety it a subtle and sleepy way if you pay attention.

You know what they say about doign the same thing over and over and expecting a different result? If you can't deal with the fact Lambchop are no longer the band they were in 90's then I'd suggest saving your money, leave them to us who'd rather appreciate what they are what they used to be.

There may be an obsession with Nixon on DiS, but not on this thread. People are stating that they didn't expect Nixon. I personally think that there should be more to live performance than playing the new album, more spontaneity. I respect the band's decision to play what they want, and still thought they were wonderful at what they did, but a song from Damaged wouldn't have been too much to ask IMO.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon