Sign In:
Login with Facebook
52841

No More Kings: The Last Of Michael Jackson, I



In the run up to the late Michael Jackson's final public act - his funeral in LA on Friday - music journalist and former Plan B Void editor kicking k writes for DiS with his personal, three part interrogation of what (if anything) the life and death of the troubled superstar was supposed supposed to mean to our generation.

 

When Michael Jackson died

...I didn't feel anything. How could I? Why would I?

I guess I'd been a casual fan

...as a kid, but it had been years since his hits had charted the central ground in any culture I was part of, even as an antithesis – mainstream/underground are pre-internet terms. And let's not fake some mature-adults art-only objectivity. I was listening to plenty of pop and R&B, just not his. The music wasn't the problem. The problem was the children.

He'd forestalled one court case and belatedly won another, but – between a media who make money from their stories and a legal system which often favours the rich – I was never able to conclusively say whether he was, even only in my opinion, definitely guilty, definitely innocent.

Like:

Why share your bed with kids?

Do you really want to criminalise inappropriate behaviour?

Yeah, but a secret room?

Aren't panic rooms almost common in higher circles now? You wouldn't have secret passages in your dream mansion?

There'd been previous claims.

Made by people who accepted money for silence.

The abused often grow to abuse...

Jackson suffered corporal punishment. No suggestion of anything sexual.

And, conversely:

The prosecutor, Tom Sneddon, did seem to have a kind of vendetta...

What, against someone under his jurisdiction he believed was abusing children with impunity?

And the family who brought the charges had a history of grifting...

So assumption of guilt based on character and circumstance is OK on one side but not the other..?

The claims were inconsistent.

Experts say genuine accounts often are. Emotion warps memory.

He didn't really have a childhood...

He wasn't the first child star.

Etc.

After a while, I refused to let myself loop anymore, couldn't see how cognitive dissonance could ever build toward anything productive.

I'd made an unconscious decision to file Michael Jackson in limbo.

He grew up

...in a small house on Jackson Street in Gary, Indiana, a declining steel district. The family – nine kids, working-class, Millenarian – had been there since 1950. No birthdays, no Xmas. By the late Sixties, the Jackson 5 would school through the week, travelling to Detroit's riverside metropolis each weekend to record for Motown, helping the young company toward 110 top ten singles in its first decade.

By '78, Michael and La Toya – who would wear disguises to witness together on suburban Sundays – moved to New York, as the former took a role in The Wiz (the film's ultimate failure would be credited by many in Hollywood as ending the era of black-only casts). On the better side, he also met Quincy Jones during filming, but we're FFWDing through their collaborations – Off The Wall, Thriller, Bad – whether his diamond age or no.

Michael bought almost 3,000 acres in Santa Barbara, California in 1988. Neverland, a child's idea of Xanadu) for pop cultural times, rose here. By 1993, Michael was willing to give Oprah a guided tour. That summer, the first child abuse claims hit. Busloads of shrieking kids made way for swarms of grimly silent police officers.

There wouldn't be another change of scene until ten years later, when Living With Michael Jackson triggered The People of the State of California v. Michael Joseph Jackson. What was intended as a reality doc mostly showed us just how unreal his life was, riding a mobility scooter through late night corridors of Las Vegas' Four Seasons hotel, buying roomfuls of royal folly furniture as and when the whim struck...

When eventually found innocent (the trial judge should be commended for disallowing cameras in the courtroom), Jackson would shun the media that had made and unmade him. Sightings in Paris, outside Dublin... his year in Bahrain was the most evocative, a self-imposed exile in a desert kingdom.

Tonight, a week after his 51st birthday, and performances 19-21 of his 50 comeback shows, the 23,000 seats of the O2 arena sit empty. After two autopsies, his body - now reunited with his brain - is being reburied, while his possessions are apparently about to go on tour without him.

It wasn't just me. Limbo was where Michael Jackson lived for the last, long stretch of his life.

I'm not going to talk about

...his early days, his career highs. You don't need anyone else's opinion on 'Billie Jean' or the Jackson 5. Thriller) is a landmark of its time whatever you think. That said, there was some stuff that surprised me when researching this article (or, ok, I just couldn't work in anywhere else):

  1. Take Two was a response to Living With Michael Jackson, showing cross-footage from the interviews (i.e. taken by Jackson's own cameraman) for extra context. It's about as sensationalistic as the other – except in the other direction.

  2. Another authorised media leak toward the end was a series of home movies, behind the scenes, across his career and often sweetly human. '2300 Jackson Street', on the other hand, is a late period Jackson family single so sentimental you'll puke rainbows.

  3. Absolutely nothing to do with anything. Ever. Before or after. But if you find a video of Jermaine Jackson backed by Devo, you share it. Oh my, etc.

I'll also be publishing all the extraneous rubbish I couldn't shoehorn into the article over at my Twitter, the next few days. X-promotion!

I scanned every article I could find

...in the week after, and it started me thinking all over again about fame and justice and art and media and money and, oh, y'know, everything. The most famous man in the world permanently shadowed by a whispering campaign. Someone who could do almost literally whatever they wanted, remodelling their face so many times it became unrecognisable. All that. But I decided that, unless new information came out, we were no nearer answers – and maybe now sealed off from them forever. I stopped reading.

Anyway, I hated most of it, the obituaries that cleanly filleted his music from his life, that parroted all the decade-old or older achievements, a legacy optimised for maximum impact by some well-briefed PR agency. It made me verrry weary to see the media who'd always put his vitiligo in ironic quote marks suddenly treating it as a minor medical detail, as if it hadn't been slyly employed as a racially-loaded weapon against him for years.

But, whatever. I wasn't thinking about it any more.

About a week later, I finally got around to listening to his music. Not the hits. Too much. Like The Beatles or something, you don't have to physically play that stuff, they're there in your memory whether you like it or not.

No, I was sticking reasonably obsessively to those last records: Dangerous, HIStory, Blood On The Dancefloor, Invincible. The ones I'd never really listened to. What I found I filtered into a playlist, put on repeat – and finally started to feel some emotion.

Tomorrow: The Last Of Michael Jackson, II: A Playable Thirteen-Track, One Hour-Plus Playlist In Search Of What Was Left 1991-2001 Through Songs At Least Co-Written By The Man In Question (Except One By R. Kelly But Oh Well) And Mostly Not The Hits, Either

Interesting, really.

I don't know if you can separate the man from the myth, the rumours, the music, the man-boy, the ranch, the children, the childhood, the family, the culture, the media, the whatever. Everything is entwined with everything else in the world of Michael Jackson.

He left a mark. On the charts and, allegedly, on some children. The music was awesome. The man a bit of a tool. I was born when his star was already on the wane, so I never really understood the obsessive element in his fanbase.

Fuck it. Enough already with the bloke. He's dead and gone.

I remember sub-editing

He

MJ

Dangerous was my first ever album. 1991, I was 9.
It shaped my idea of rhythm, changed a lot of things. Lyrics were incredibly articolate for an Italian 9 years old. That's also when I started to reason about music as something meaningful.

That album's production still blows away most of the crap MTV airs today, and I think still will.

HIStory kicked much ass too. Blood on the Dance Floor showcased industrial influences to the maximum (and prophetic undertones with MORPHINE).

By the time INVINCIBLE came out I was tripping on SEPULTURA.
In my opinion, Max Cavalera is not that far away from MJ.

!!

P Diddy had very precisely described the genius of Michael Jackson: "He showed that you can actually see the beat. He made the music come to life. He made me believe in magic."

Here I've tried to collect all notable tributes paid to Michael Jackson by peers:

http://www.tributespaid.com/category/m/michael-jackson

I like the graphic

Did you guys (DiS) do that or did you lift it from somewhere? No matter. Whoever did it is pretty damn good with Photoshop.

the pic is from...

...the cover of 'Ghosts', his 1996 film w/Steven King. that's covered tomorrow - there's a lot to say about 1991-2001, and the playlist is the chronological core of the piece (it's actually weird publishing I a day before II, like an intro without a main argument - hopefully it at least sets the scene, and i revisit this stuff in III).

and Max - 'Morphine' is on the playlist tomorrow. that was a real surprise.

^ this @ Kissingkansas

God yes. I scrolled down hoping to find someone else who saw this as very badly written too. I'm glad.

Kicking_k, you say it's an intro, and fair enough, but there's nothing in this that could make me want to read II. You as much as say you've never even listened to Jackson, there's very little structure (so all over the place), and the one thing that could have saved it - decent language, funny, interesting, poetic, anything - just wasn't there.

Just was poor is all.

dude

weak

so..?

so what are you saying...do u like his music or not? however, considering you havent even heard it till yesterday i hardly think you are qualified to write this article. why are you writing for a music portal if you dont listen to MJ's music...i mean EVERYONE listens to his music.

Doesnt your publication have anyone else to write this article, someone a little more qualified than you?

please dont write part II

yea and please dont bother writing part two. clearly you are not qualified....

yeesh

II + III are written - they were written together, though each part is presented in a different manner. i'm pretty certain that those who find I unsatisfying - and i take the point, i am listening - will find II much more traditionally-written and content-oriented (whereas this is supposed to be all about the profusion of links - as departures).

i'll take the terminal diagnoses on the chin - i've made my living writing and editing in the print press for the last three years, but this is only my second long-form piece for the web, and rather than replicating my standard approach to the page, i decided i wanted to try something stylistically different, something designed around hyperlinks. maybe there are missteps...it probably cd have been tighter, sure - but the reason i wanted it published here was that i knew i'd get plenty feedback - the hope is i'll continue to experiment, but get closer to my aims through unworking parts flamed.

as for not listening to Michael, i think you've misread - i make the point that his pre-1991 material is ubiquitous and i'm not covering for that reason - it's the releases post-1993 that began to suffer from the allegations' fall-out. and, although i'll freely admit i was one of those who didn't pay much attention - for reasons this section tries to outline - by the time of writing the article, i have listened to them /a lot/. i think that will be demonstrated by II.

If this one is about the profusion of links

Why do so few of them work properly?

If this one is about the profusion of links

Why do so few of them work properly?

lessons have been learned.

everything is OK.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon