DiSmissive: Mixing pop and politics
Today is Blog Action Day, when online bloggers around the world will come together to publish their thoughts on the issue of poverty.
"On October 15th bloggers everywhere will publish posts that discuss poverty in some way. By all posting on the same day we aim to change the conversation that day, to raise awareness, start a global discussion and add momentum to an important cause"
Which is all well and good, right? All of us want to make a positive difference, whether it's cycling, recycling, doing a sponsored handstand or even something like buying Fair Trade chocolate to ease our conscience. Then there’s championing a political cause or a candidate for office, all part of our democratic rights as citizens.
This is where musicians come in. Rightly or wrongly, there are very few people in the world who have the appeal and influence of pop stars; they create column inches for the print and online press and are easily identifiable to the public. Unfortunately, they often decide to bestow their opinions on us.
If the average Joe from Amersham runs a blog they may get a few thousand hits, but if Bob Geldof puts on a gig or Paul David Hewson (Bono to you, me, and his mum) speaks, half the world and his wife listens to what this self-appointed messiah of our time has to say. The other half is shaking his hand and patting his back. Bono has even been elevated to such a status that everyone's favourite Alaskan "hockey mom", Sarah Palin, was due to meet him last month to discuss world poverty, the day after she met Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai.
Bob Geldof in action
Across the pond we've had acts like The Beastie Boys, The Mae-Shi, The Black Lips and Vampire Weekend all announcing shows in support of Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama. Are people going to be swayed by this? Is there a voter somewhere in America thinking "I was gonna go for McCain, but now MCA's gunning for Barack there's no choice!"? It'd also be a little more surprising if they were turning out for McCain. Eddie Van Halen got into a bit of a huff recently when John McCain (whose running mate's youngest son's name is Trig Paxson Van Palin - sounds like Van Halen, geddit?) used their 1991 hit 'Right Now' at the Republican National Congress, just as he did when George W. Bush did so four years previously. Rebellion and radicalism has become a predictable part of the rock 'n' roll mentality and it is really no understatement to say that it is more radical today to be a right-wing musician than a left-wing one, and as a result we're often left with musicians trotting out the same old clichéd guff about politics, chirping in with "Fuck Bush!" between songs.
Of course, some people don't take kindly to pop stars shoving the issue of third world hunger down our gullets, especially when the pop stars who are preaching are so bloated on the fruits of their own labours. Many would also prefer not to see musicians use poverty as a vehicle for feeding their own egos rather than the world. Even the thousands who turned up at Live8 weren't exactly united behind one political cause of making poverty history; it was more likely that they fancied a day out and grasped with both wristbanded hands the chance to see 'Bedshaped' live. It'll take a bit more than slogans and singing to impact on global poverty.
Jello Biafra runs for mayor of San Francisco
But whilst there are musicians whose political endeavours are an exercise in self-promotion and ego-inflation, there are also those for whom politics is pretty much the raison d'etre for the music - see Rage Against The Machine. But how bloody boring would they be without the politics? Does this make them any more qualified to comment on politics though? No, and just because there's a bloke from Essex with a guitar singing about the Unions, it doesn't mean he knows any more than the crusty old tramp shouting at you every week outside Sainsburys, and many musicians' attempts are often far more cringeworthy than some drunken fool's.
That's not to say music and politics are always a bad combination. Sometimes music is more than just preaching, and more than 15 year old kids sticking two fingers up to 'the man' and pissing off their parents. Often music is a snapshot of the political climate of the time (see: Punk, rock 'n' roll and countless other genres), and can genuinely tune into the feelings of a group of people or even a nation at a particular time for a particular reason. There's more than just getting up on stage in Hyde Park or appearing in an Amnesty Ad to mixing music with politics.
Maybe there will be a day when we won’t have to put up with the guilt-laced ramblings of failing and failed pop and rock stars trying to "make a difference". But until then, we're just going to have to put up with the pomposity and wait to see if anyone still remembers the words to 'I Don't Like Mondays' in 2025.
- Watch: Imaginary Landscapes a documentary about Brian Eno and ambient music
- U2 - Achtung Baby (20th Anniversary Deluxe Edition)
- Glastonbury 2011: The DiS Highlights
- In Photos: U2 @ Glastonbury Festival 2011
- In Photos: Glastonbury Festival 2011 - Day 2 @ Worthy Farm, Pilton
- DiSsers Recommend... Who to see at Glastonbury 2011
- Glastonbury 2011: DiS' 65-Songs to Get You In The Mood (Spotify)
- Death Cab for Bass: Mixtape of Songs That Inspired Nick to Play Bass
My main issue with the 'preachers'
Bono and Chris Martin i'm looking squarely at you, is the blatant hypocrisy. Bono bought into the company (Pandemic) that make the game mercenaries, a series of games that involves invasions of certain politically hot countries, so while he preaches peace he's promoting war.
Chris Martin talks about global warming yet has a private jet. These are the peopel that should stay out of politics oh and politicians!!
why cant i comment on the article, rather than having to reply?
i think that if i was in the public eye i'd want to try to do my bit to raise awareness about issues i care about.
but i do agree that alot of the time it seems more of a publicity stunt that true philanthropy.
this gets my award for
"Most Unnecessary Article Ever"
I sort of agree. The reason why i respect Billy Bragg
is that he's willing to get his hand's dirty. Attending Labour confrences as a delegate, speaking at back-room smokey meetings, not just the Wembley stadium shindigs... It's a shame the right don't have equally articulate artists. For example, musicians who could argue intelligently the case for intervention in evil dictatorships. Sadly this is deemed too 'unfashionable' in indieland, so we're denied the chance to have that argument and forcefed meaningless slogans instead.
The Manics are probably the biggest hypocrits - their support for regimes where power is passed to the brother of a former leader, and free press and trade unions are banned, is particularly sickening.
Yeah But
Jello Biafra was/is one of the real deals. Can't think of too many other punks who've been arrested by the FBI. aaaahhh Fresh Fruit....
most of those pro-Obama gigs
are in states where you need to register in advance in order to vote, it's about galvanising the electorate, not about noisily informing the world of one's affiliation.
I'm not entirely sure I see the point in this article - it seems to be working on the general assumption that any effort made by any pop star to try and do something about poverty or politics is an act of pure narcissism. Bono's a bit ludicrous, but the idea that after two decades of activism he's no more effectual or qualified than a bloke down the pub is absurd.
Also what is this nebulous 'qualification' that's apparently required if one is to talk about politics?
"I'm not entirely sure I see the point in this article"
To instigate debate, which is precisely what this is. Mission accomplished I'd say.
The "third world?"
As a term - it's outdated. I raised this with Private Eye too - they, thankfully, agreed. 'Developing countries' or simply 'Poor countries' is far more preferable. Majority world is even better. Clearly, if Bono et al had made a significant impact on the world, people might at least recognise this basic misconception.
However, charities need celebrity faces to push their causes to the media who will, in turn, sell it to the public. Maybe. IF all these musicians really wanted to smash hunger - a % of profits from the lot of them would help. Greater pressure on Government too! Not escaping to a fucking tax exile. Adopting babies then giving money from photographs to charity? Yeah - it's a start - but it's hiding the issue.
point taken
I suppose what I meant was that well written as it, this article reads like a series of assumptions rather than an argument - it makes a very cynical assumption about why musicians get involved with politics and campaigning, and also leaves it with the inference that they rarely achieve anything.
I'd argue that Bono
a) Probably knows quite a lot about politics
b) Has by and large been a force for good rather than harm
c) Has gotten involved in this sphere for considerably more noble reasons than 90 per cent of politicians
d) Is a smug pompous hypocrite who hasn't made a good record in a decade (SHUT UP I LIKE POP)and is given to horribly cheesy proclaimations, but is basically a good hearted individual trying to do the right thing
is voting open to the public?
'cos you can count on mine in support of yours.
This is one of those places where
I would use that little roof symbol to indicate that I agree with everything the above person has said (esp. about POP).

Muse discuss U2 US tour, The Resistance + more
Live 8? Not so great
Glastonbury 2011: DiS' 65-Songs to Get You In The Mood (Spotify)
U2
Rage Against The Machine
The Clash
Billy Bragg
DiS meets John Lydon - Part 1: The Man
DiS Does Singles 20.05.13: Paramore, Laura Marling, The Replacements
DiS joins the Music Alliance Pact + May 2013's global MAP compilation
Drowned in Bristol #12
DiS Does Singles 13.05.13: Swim Deep, These New Puritans, The National
Darkstar, Ed Harcourt, Halls, Wall +more for 3 DiS-curated nights at Great Escape 2013
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article