The Weekly DiScussion: is the July 9 release of 'Hunting For Witches' insensitive?
- Artists:
- Bloc Party »
“The newscaster says the enemy’s among us,
As bombs explode on the 30 bus.
Kill your middle-class indecision,
Now is not the time for liberal thought.”
On July 9, 2007, popular London-based indie-rock band Bloc Party will release the third single from their acclaimed second album, A Weekend In The City. A standout track on said album, ‘Hunting For Witches’ tackles paranoia and fear amongst the British population in the wake of the 2005 terrorist attacks on London, attacks which left 52 innocent people dead and 700-plus injured. The city’s public transport system was targeted, with bombs detonated on the Underground network and a double-decker, the above-quoted “30 bus”.
The bombs exploded on the morning July 7, 2005; ‘Hunting For Witches’ is released on the first Monday following the two-year anniversary of the attacks which inspired it, i.e. on the first-available release date. Which leads this DiS writer to ask: is this a cheap, sensationalist move on the part of the band, or rather their label and management (probably), or does the release of ‘Hunting For Witches’ serve as a reminder that so little has changed since the London bombings? Our televisions and the printed press, particularly the more right-leaning tabloids, are still full to bursting with reports of hostilities generated by racial and religious divisions, small-minded individuals of reactionary demeanours and short fuses. London is a city blessed with a fantastically diverse immigrant population, but to the outsider – the non-Londoner – it seems as if the 2005 attacks were just the headline-generating and attention-throttling manifestation of a deeper problem, of a lack of integration and an unwillingness within the city’s many religious groups to ‘get along’ with their neighbours. Of course, those who live within the city’s boundaries know that this isn’t wholly the case.
Employees of V2 and Wichita have told me on separate occasions, and off-record, that the release of ‘Hunting For Witches’ on July 9 has nothing to do with the London bombings – the release date has been assigned due to T In The Park, which takes place on the weekend of July 6-8, and at which Bloc Party are due to play. The subject of the bombings, apparently, was never raised. The release makes sense, timing wise, from a business point of view, but does the wider picture not present the outsider with the possibility that the release date is a little, for want of a better word, unsympathetic? Does it not smack of a marketing plan – however much the powers that be deny said allegation – standing in the way of a little humanistic compassion?
Bloc Party are a band tied to London – the city is their muse throughout A Weekend In The City, so much so that it could almost be categorised as a concept record based around the many amazing facets – and the not-so-brilliant aspects – London has to offer residents and visitors alike. Sure, it’s dirty and can be dangerous, but it’s a city that many hold dear and close to their hearts; I certainly miss London whenever I am away from it, and it’s not even my hometown strictly speaking. Bloc Party – clearly enraptured by London and presumably keen to allow its wounds to heal – have never appeared to be fond of those above them forcing their wares down the throats of would-be consumers; they’ve always seemed too intelligent for cheap tricks and convenient opportunities. But releasing ‘Hunting For Witches’ on July 9…? Even the demonised Daily Mail could spin the decision against the band and their pay-masters.
Of course, I could be thinking about this way too much – the song was always likely to be a single, and while it maybe should have been the second from the album (‘I Still Remember’ makes more sense as a summertime release, to me, while there’s something about the oppressive beats of ‘Hunting For Witches’ that suits the grey slate skies of the typical British springtime – just look outside) its eventual release really isn’t surprising. It’s also perfect for remixing, given its electronic overtones, and fans will be able to create their own versions of the song using fancy new technology upon its release. I might even have a go myself. Yet, for all the “it is just a song” thoughts that cross my mind, and continue to do so even as I type this, I can’t help feeling that there’s a lack of sensitivity about the July 9 release date. It’s too soon, maybe; Brits have a habit of celebrating their scars, after a fashion – of talking-up failures and reminiscing over unfortunate events – and the ones left by the bombings are still as fresh as any proverbial daisies. Do we need a popular rock band saying they’re going “hunting for witches”, seeking out those who could be seen by fools with tunnel vision as related in some tenuous way to the perpetrators, however oxymoronically knowing such a statement is? In all honesty, probably not.
Bloc Party’s lyricist, Kele Okereke, has said of ‘Hunting For Witches’: “I was amazed at how easy it’d be to whip them (the mainstream press) up into a fury.” It seems, via fair means or foul, he’s going to have his way whether his critics – and more importanly his fans – like it or not. “All reasonable thought is being drowned out,” goes the song at the centre of this DiScussion; in this instance, it would seem that the opportunist individuals in the higher echelons of Bloc Party’s business camp have talked over the doubts surrounding this release of ‘Hunting For Witches’. They have ignored the feelings of not only those directly affected by the bombings, but also those who believed that Bloc Party weren’t the sort of band to look for cheap column inches to flog their records.
To this writer, at least, the release of ‘Hunting For Witches’ on July 9 feels like a poor move, and one that could dent the reputation of its makers. But then again, the doubts keep on creeping: it’s a song, a good one, and it’s a distinct possibility that the London attacks really weren’t discussed when a release date was pencilled in. Ultimately, I’m unsure where I stand on the matter, and it’s given me a big enough headache already (plus, this article is proof that the release date is sure to generate pre-release coverage, so well done business folk!) – so it’s over to you, the readers.
DiScuss…
- In Photos: Bloc Party @ The Academy, Sheffield
- In Photos: Leeds Festival 2009 - Day 2
- DiS' 20 Must-See Acts at Reading & Leeds 2009
- Drowned in Friday: Party? Drink? I'm in Love? TFI?
- This Week's Singles: 10/08/2009
- T In The Park: The (slightly delayed) DiS review
- Glastonbury In Photos: Bloc Party
- In Photos: Glastonbury 2009 - Day 2
From the archive
um
Clearly if the song's point is worth anything at all, it has just as much point a year after the bombings than any other time. Providing a song doesn't condone such an event, I don't see how mentioning it in a song, or suggesting that some of the response to it has been negative, is "insensitive"...
ditto
I agree with the above and would like to add its hardly a united 93 esq situation here. The songs sentiments still exist and are poignant with or without the event(even if it does highlight those feelings). Apart from anything else it seems an irrational and unconventional at best method of advertising; unless of course they are relying on the viral articles like this. :o
i think it was
Alexis Petridis, in the Guardian, said it was, something like "so gauche as to make you sympathise with John Reid."
It's a fair point, too, lyrically I find it clumsy and obvious.
well i make that
12 square inches...
I am neither a londoner nor a block party fan.
I don't buy the sensationalist aspect, the majority of music dabblers are not going to hear it, and if they do they will mostly hear it rather than listen to it. I also very much doubt that 2 years after the event any song is likely change anyone's opinion about what happened.
Is the anniversary so significant? To a non-londoner i wonder if it is much different to the Omagh bombing, without getting into the relative atrociousness, which we do not mark in any particular way.
Media whim is a dangerous thing, and the desire to court it hinted at here is objectionable, but the song itself does not appear sensationalist.
Mountains, molehills, storms and teacups.
I understand
where Mike's coming from completely but if anything I think it'll have very little impact.
I think the song is lyrically much better than people are making out - if it is supposed to have any effect then I think it HAS to be lyrically very obvious.
Good record anyway.
worse
lyric i ever read. i even prefer 'i wanna have your babies, i'm serious like crazy, see them springing up like daisies' and every single rhyming of 'world' and 'girl' in the history of popular music.
It is
a real clunker, like most of the rest of the album unfortunately. Musically tight though...
You're wrong
You're wrong - Bloc Party's album is amazing and if only people took the time to listen & understand the lyrics it would make a lot of people sit up and realise we have so much to do about the state of things. I think the release is appropriate, and not a media attention seeking act. 2 years on may seem an odd time to remember, but it's not like they could have written and released it any sooner. A good song is better late than never!
It's not exactly Chomsky is it
The best part of the song is the first 30 seconds. Y'know, the bit without words.
i hear and understand the lyrics
they're all just very poorly executed
for subtle, yet scathing lyrics see arctic monkeys, they are lyrical masters
hah, yeah
when it sounds like radiohead
Sensible rather than insensitive
I think the whole idea of this song is to provoke scandal amongst media so Bloc Party are probably enjoying the fact that this debate even exists.
I seriously doubt that the release date is due to T in the Park, I just wish the label/band would say that they are releasing it because it coincides with the anniversary of the attacks.
I personally think that it's a fantastic move and anybody who thinks that this is insensitive is far too politically correct.
whats wrong with this move
bloc party are speaking out agaist people who adopt xenophobic attitudes following a crisis.bloc party's message in this song is:it's not cool to be part of an angry mob.there's nothing wrong with that.i dont think it's insensitive at all
If the song was inciteful and intelligent
It would be a brave move. The fact that it's sub-sixth form (fifth form?) toss is pretty insulting to anyone who was directly affected by the bombing to release it AT ALL.
I love the fact
that a lot of the people who slag off this song seemingly haven't actually read the lyrics - either that or they've heard it once and have singled out the sampled "six pack of beer" line as Proof That Kele Is Shit. Either that or they decided long before they heard 'A Weekend In The City' that it was shit. Because Bloc Party are like, you know, popular now. And stuff.
Here are the lyrics, anyway, if anyone hasn't read them yet - I think they're quite good, and given the choice between Kele singing about things that he feels are important and Alex Turner singing snidey songs about people who wear clothes he doesn't much like in indie clubs, I'll take Kele, cheers.
HUNTING FOR WITCHES
I'm sitting on the roof of my house
With a shotgun and a six pack of beer
The newscaster say's "the enemy is among us!"
As bombs explode on the 30 bus
Kill that middle class indecision
Now is not the time for liberal thought
So I go hunting for witches
Heads are going to roll
So I go hunting
1990's, optimistic as a teen
But now its terror, airplanes crash into towers
The Daily mail say's "the enemy is among us!"
"Taking our women and taking our jobs"
All reasonable thought is being drowned out
By the non-stop baying, baying for blood
So I go hunting for witches
Heads are going to roll
So I go hunting
I was an ordinary man, with ordinary desire
I watched TV it informed me
I was an ordinary man with ordinary desire
There must be accountability
Disparate and misinformed
Fear keeps us all in place
Erm not really
I loved Silent Alarm and the EPs before it and Kele when I bumped into him at Bethnal Green tube but those aren't good lyrics. The points are fair enough but putting them across in that fairly obvious manner is far more suited to Question Time than a pop song. His better lyrics are the ambiguous, emotionally felt ones rather than this over rational argument as is true of most lyricists.
As for the release date it doesn't worry me too much. As it is a critique of a media reaction not anyone involved it seems fairly detached from it.
If you liked that
You'll love this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMQNH9G5nbI
Who wrote this song? Jeremy Kyle?
Kele Okereke should take over presenting his show for a week. The release date is the kind of self important manoeuvre Jeremy Kyle would pull. It's not offensive in any way. Just a little obvious and cack-handed. The message they're putting out their isnt a bad one. And i think it is dangerous territory when people start saying things are hackneyed and over done whether it to be with wars or terrorism. So the only problem with this release is the ego of Kele/Jeremy. "Listen to what i am telling you. This is important. I have a message. People are scared of Asians and about being blown up! Take a look at how we are being you scum." **AUDIENCE APPLAUDS** The reason i believe there to be an ego around him is from reading his interviews and knowing his work up to this point. The man thinks he is voice of the "clever" individual.
You need to
FUCK right off.
kthxbye.

This Week's Singles: 27/04/09
Let It Bleep: Dancefloor dishevelment, electronic emissions and bassbin bastardisations
In Photos: Glastonbury 2009 - Day 2
Bloc Party
A Month in Records: April 2006
ReDiScover: Low
Rock 'n' Tyrol: Snowbombing 2009 preview
In Photos: Arctic Monkeys @ Wembley Arena, London
In Photos: The Flaming Lips @ The Academy, Manchester
In Photos: Moby @ The Palace Theatre, London
In Photos: Tegan & Sara @ Shepherds Bush Empire, London
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article