Sign In:

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Apparently Morrissey forgot this cynicism when ‘You Are the Quarry’ was tarted up and re-released as a Deluxe Super-Dooper Edition. Or perhaps this should be expected from elder statesmen of rock, like Elvis who while being dead is still a bigger media-whore than if Jordan joined Fathers4Justice. If I hear one more of his singles I will personally travel to Graceland and daub the words “greedy”, “bastards”, and “fucking” in a certain order with letters ten feet high. Surely no-one is buying these records now other than people who use Elvis tea towels to dry their limited edition Elvis plate sets?

The Industry claims to need the money because evil downloaders are sending us all to hell quicker than you can say “three pounds for a single?!” But when they attempt to rape us with new bands like Bloc Party you can’t help but feel dirty, used and cheated. ‘Banquet’ is their next single and unless I’ve inadvertently slipped into a time machine, it’s a re-release from a band who aimed to stay artistically independent by signing to Wichita. Don’t get me wrong, the song was one of the most striking singles of 2004 and everyone with a pulse and at least one ear should hear it.

But it was a top single of last year and appears on their top three charting album, so it was hardly going to become an undiscovered cult secret, was it? There are at least four other album tracks which would have sat just as (un)suitably between McFly and Rooster on daytime playlists. Kele claims to have 22 new songs demoed so why not, y’know, like, record them and then, like uum, release them? Touring commitments are a bitch but must we be subjected to the same songs over and over and over…?

Surprisingly, including duff live versions and rubbish re-mixes of old songs as b-sides really doesn’t make loyal fans feel particularly special either. And how about not releasing albums with a bonus DVD five minutes after we’ve bought the one disc original thankyouverymuch. Bands of the quality of The Futureheads, Kasabian and The Killers - who it feels like have put out ‘Somebody Told Me’ 48 times – really should know better.

Kaiser Chiefs at least had the decency to re-record ‘Oh My God’ to make a purchase worthwhile. Honourable mention must also go to The Stone Roses for an ingenious use of Dulux in an attempt to retain artistic credibility after the ‘Sally Cinnamon’ debacle.

However, the most vitriol and flaming toilet paper should be launched at huge bands like Jet, The Dandy Warhols and erm, The Mock Turtles who re-released in the name of pimping out mobile phones. Any record released with a sticker saying “As featured on the advert of…” should by rights be rounded up, dumped in a huge pile and given the good old fashioned bonfire treatment.

Bands understandably want to get out of the toilet circuit, but please don’t defecate on your fans in the process. ‘Paint a Vulgar Picture’ indeed…

“Please them. Please them. Please them. Sadly this was your life but you could’ve said no. If you wanted to…”

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

hehe, i like this piece ... its true.

bloc partys album does have a whole bunch of other (some better even) songs on it they could release.

re-releases that come out straight after the original are a terrible way to con fans out of their money.

didnt that kasabian song chart lower as a reissue ?


maybe theres a reason single sales are falling.....we already own the damned things from last time !

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

This has been happening for a while with the whole release a normal version so the fans would buy that straight away.then a fourtnight later release the "special edition" with a dvd that you'll never watch on it. It's just lovely :o)

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

re-releases that come out straight after the original are a terrible way to con fans out of their money.

Yeah. It's terrible that you don't HAVE A CHOICE when it comes to buying things.

Spot the subliminal message. Go on. Dare ya.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

A fornight is a bit much - normally it would come at the end of an album's promotional lifespan, after 3/4 singles, at least 8-9 months after the original.

Recently.. well, the second albums from The Libertines and The Music were both released at the same time as *the second single* from them, ie only about 2/3 months after they came out.

Taking the piss, much?

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

As I said on the thread about this before, I really don't see all the hoopla about them rereleasing 'Banquet'. Singles are essentially nothing more than adverts for albums and live shows, no matter which way you look at it, so it makes sense to release something that's obviously the most commercial track on the album.

My main issue with the release - and with their last single - is just them running out of material. I mean, the 7" has another version of Tulips on it - the third version to be released, and it was only a b-side in the first place!

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

if I'm not mistaken, this version's not actually even by them, it's by another band completely

priceless.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Nah, there's a cover of 'Banquet' on the CD - at least I assume it's a cover. It's listed as "(Another Version by The Glimmers)", which could just mean a terrible remix.

There's a radio session version of 'Tulips' on the b-side of the 7"

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

well shucks, I'm literally exploding out of my own skin with the need to own that.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I've already cleared a space on my shelf and set aside a £1 coin for it...

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I suppose we should be taking bets on whose back catalogue gets the one-single-a-week re-release next.
The Beatles? Maybe, although thats been done a thousand times already.
The Stones? Probably not. Would take about three years to get every single out and would involve too many contractual issues with various record companies.
No, my money's on Mr God himself, Cliff Richard.
The thing that gets me the most are those dickheads who've already got the singles, the albums, the box sets, the tea cups etc etc but want to buy the same shit AGAIN just to keep the collection up!

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”


I don't think the Beatles would get the reissue thing going yet whilst there's still some issue over ownership related to that funny wannabe-molestation expert in court right now. Cliff is the only real alternative as the shelf life of his fans must be coming up to that moment where Heaven and Hell become retirement options. If it's not Cliff then I hope they really go out and take the piss by reissuing every Britney single.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

If it's not Cliff then I hope they really go out and take the piss by reissuing every Britney single.

Given BMG's recent actions, I would't be surprised if they didn't reissue every Kasabian single released so far...

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

In fairness to Kasabian, a DVD version was available at launch. But I take the general point and it really annoys me. Most of the time I don't buy the new edition - the exception was with The Futureheads - sold my old album for £8 on eBay and got the new DVD version for only another quid.

Reissued singles are different though... even as a fan, you don't really NEED to buy them. Unless of course you want the extra tracks, in which case it hardly matters what the lead track is as you'll have it already.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I quite like the re-issued or re-packaged versions. They tend to stand out in your collection and if they're limited edition, all the better for it in years to come.
Sometimes i dream of retiring of the proceeds that all these limited edition albums and singles may fetch on eBay in ther distant future.
Good recent reissues have been The Manics 'The Holy Bible' (2CD + DVD), Pavement 'Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain (2CD Deluxe Edition) and The Clash 'London Calling' (2CD + DVD Deluxe Edition).
Hope to see The Secret Machines 'Now Here Is Nowhere' get a reissue with additional trimmings
Some single reissues do seem rather pointless though.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Yeah, but they're vaguely worthywhile reissues of 'classic' albums.

We're talking about reissues of current albums.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I think its a bit unfair to attack the re-issue of 'You are the Quarry'- there was pretty much a full albums worth of B sides included with it which were pretty enjoyable.

I do take issue with the re-release of 'Banquet' though- I mean most music fans were dancing to this in the clubs towards the top end of last year. The album was going great guns as well so its not like they needed the extra exposure.

That new video they recorded is fucking pathetic as well.oooh how do we appeal to kids who get "left behind"?Lets just get a load of ugly kids (and Im not being rude here, but they chose not so good looking kids for a fucking cynical reason) and tell them that we care.

making teenagers feel isolated is like shooting fish in a barrel, and directly appealing to these sensibilities with such a sentimental line is pretty awful

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Any record with a sticker saying "as seen in the advert for"...

except "drinking in LA" by Bran Van 3000 from the Rolling Rock adverts in the mid-90s. Tune.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I don't see anything wrong in the reissue of "banquet". Its obviously one of the standout tracks on the album so is a perfect choice for a single to advertise the band to new listeners. We here all may know that it was released as a single before but most people don't. remember it was only a limited edition single on "moshi moshi" records. Wichita didn't even release it the first time.

Kasabians reissues on the other hand are someting different

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I don't see any problem at all with people reissuing singles. Who cares that 'Banquet' is re-released? If you've got it already....don't fucking buy it! If you've got the album, chances are you're not going to buy it anyway. If they released another song off the album as a single why would that be any different? If you have the album already you already know all the tunes so it makes no difference whether it's 'Banquet' or 'She's Hearing Voices'. You're either gonna buy it anyway regardless of the lead track for the b-sides, or you're not going to buy it cos it's a track you already know off the album.

At least Bloc Party did the bonus dvd with the album when it first went on sale, rather than the Furutreheads et al who waited til everyone who was going to buy it had bought it, then made uber fans have to buy it again for the bonus stuff. That is wrong.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

that's not the point.
If you like a band, and said band re-releases a record instead of offering an initial option of regular release (usually referred to as the Special Edition when there's nothing special about it) or release with bonus DVD, you have the option UP FRONT to choose how much of the band you want.
Releasing a record six months later with a bonus DVD is just RUDE.
It also seems kind of stupid move for a relatively new, unproven indie band.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Good article, yes I'm sick of this. Just when I thought these shit songs had been laid to rest I've got to endure it yet again whenever I watch TV or go out. Don't kid yourselves, if a band is re-releasing something it's not "because not enough people got a chance to enjoy it", to me it's simply an admittance that the band have nothing else worth hearing (which with a lot of these filler-packed guitar bands of today doesn't surprise me).

One band who piss me off is Interpol, the b-sides only ever consist of one live version, bit of a con really.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Great srticle very true. If you want something to listen to on this subject try The Clash - Complete control
It's all aobut them not wanting to releasse remote control as a single after it had already been on hte debut album

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Haven't they already? Or am I getting confused by this band's staggering unoriginality into thinking I heard all of their singles during the early to mid 90's?

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Th author of this article really dropped the ball with this piece of really crap journalism.

You know the reason for the "reissue! repackage! repackage!"???

BECAUSE IT'S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND THE B-SIDES FROM HIS SINGLES IN AMERICA!!! The stores will not stock them. Thats a fact. Sad but true.

Don't you try to investigate anything before writing about it, and/ or insulting an artist by suggesting that Morrissey is some sort of greedy bastard? If that was true about Moz he could have accepted any number of record deals with major labels so many years sooner. I think this man should be applauded for his loyalty to his bandmates. The major labels wanted him, they just didn't want his band as well. As a matter of fact, he was offered a deal with some big company if he agreed to make a record with Radiohead for fuck sake.

You call yourself a journalist? What a pity.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

quit sulking, fuckwit.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

Ooh, I think we have a mental giant in the house. I wouldn't be surprised if you're the dumb son of a bitch who wrote that stupid fucking article.

Tit!

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

hahaha
no
i'm just sick of fucking whingers whinging about everything ever and adopting the 'holier-than-thou' posture
i, therefore, wouldn't be surprised if you're an elitist indie snob.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

As I said (see above comment)!

Cos the reality is, you're not worth it, not in the slightest.

P. S. Go Fuck Yourself.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

I find it really annoying when bands rerelease their singles becuase it feel like they're ignoring the fans that originally bought the thing in the first place.
In my mind the message a rerelease sends out is "HEY! All you kids that suddenly realise that its ok and cool to like this song/band! We're going to rerelease it for you so you don't have to travel too far into the depths of you local HMV in order to find the original - instead you can just stay safely near the chart section, and still be able to say that you listen to good music!"
If I wanted a single from a particular band I would go and find that single.I wouldn't wait and hope for a rerelease.

I find it interesting htough that some of you don't have a problem with this issue becuase "singles are just ways of advertising a band/album". Why must a single be rereleased in order to keep advertising said band? Perhaps its not rereleases that we should be spitting fire at, but once again, the whole radio/music channel playlist issue. A great single is a great single regardless of how old it is. I call for a revolution!

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

aaah, Pavement. Now THAT's a reissue. The re-releases of the Meat Puppets albums on cd were pretty good too - some of them have as many decent bonus tracks as there was tracks on the album to begin with.

...that didn't come out to intelligibly, but hopefully you'll follow.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

The first example I can remember of a piggybank raping reissue would be the My Vitriol album. They released every song they could as a single, then put all the b-sides, chaff and newer mixes on a second disc, thereby making the single purchases almost pointless.

The Morrissey album is worse though, especially when you consider there was a spesh edition that came out on the day of release; and that the b-sides for 'I have forgiven Jesus' aren't included in either. You can't get the b-sides in the states? Amazon isn't just a river in Brazil, Toto, and the record company could have made the release America only instead of making fans worldwide look down the back of the sofa for change.

And two live performances released *on the same day*?
He really is milking the comeback for every penny.

Class re-issues happen though ... Death to the pixies with the bonus live show. The re-issue of Grace with the extra disc was good. The Ryko versions of the Bowie albums were well worth it, too.

“Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

ANd your point was what? Re-issues are bad, yes. So why spend 750 words stating the blimmin' obvious?

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

If all journalists used your statement as a template, magazines would be a bit dull.

GET BEHIND ME SATAN review
Their 5th album, buy it.
****

wouldn't really be worth reading would it?

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

A review is is a review. It's an opinion, nay a dissection of something. A good review will offer an original look rather than the same old down-the-line comparisons. That's the difference between Mojo and the NME. Either way, you feel you've learned something from a review - whether it's what a record sounds like, or who they're ripping off.

A feature like is pure regurgitated boredom, offering nothing new. You don't come away any the wiser to anything.

Don't make the mistake that just because you write, you're a journalist.

Re: “Reissue! Repackage! Repackage!”

GET BEHIND ME SATAN review
Their 5th album, give up.
*

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon