Sign In:
Login with Facebook

Peeping Tom

Edit this event

Mike Patton’s Peeping Tom is a puzzling beast of a band: an ensemble of highly disparate artists, the collective fuses hip-hop with scat-pop, funk bass lines with chattering click drums and to-a-tune scratches. Their self-titled debut album of earlier this year – much-anticipated prior to its May release – was met by a mixed reception: some praised its embracing of variety and many changes in pitch and tone, while others derided its incoherency and over-reliance on the clout of guest contributors. Live, it seems opinions on Patton’s so-called pop project are equally split: those at his feet, pressed against the barrier arms aloft, are clearly enthralled; those towards the venue’s ample rear are content to catch fleeting moments of each song before returning to their social chatter.

Patton and his collective – a DJ high to his right, a beat-boxing Rahzel to his left – run through a series of selections from the aforementioned album, the only disc to bear the Peeping Tom branding as yet. At its best the set’s a bouncing rap-along, those in the know spitting along with Patton’s rhymes and the uninitiated trying their best to keep up with his rapid-fire vowels; at its worse they emulate the limp funk-rock of the Chili Peppers, albeit with some mediocre turntablism tossed over the top. Somewhere between these two musical antipodes the many-limbed musical troupe successfully emulate the interesting pop-hip-hop of recent touring partners Gnarls Barkley. Sadly, though, they’ve no ‘Crazy’ in their repertoire, let alone a ‘Smiley Faces’.

Although their music spreads itself across many a base, Patton at least knows where he is this evening, geographically speaking: repeatedly, London is told to “get the fuck up”, or “wave your fucking hands”, or some other bellowed instruction comes screaming from Patton’s jaws (the above may not be entirely word-for-word). He asks around: who are the lamest artists out there? Kasabian are booed, and then the boo is cheered; likewise The Streets. Patton cackles wildly, like Sesame Street’s Count enjoying infinity-card pick-up. But the most-hated act on Patton and company’s radar is Wolfmother: they hate Wolfmother. And what does this have to do with Peeping Tom’s music on the night. Nothing, directly, but that these moments of artist-to-crowd-and-back-again banter comprise highlights, well, it tells you something about the consistency of Peeping Tom’s performance.

Interludes only splinter the already badly-bound set further: a solo spot from Rahzel doesn’t exactly exhibit his world-conquering skills – in fact, his turn in the spotlight is rather lacklustre given the ability apparent on his own recordings – and the DJ’s chance to shine leaves all but a few already-ringing front-row ears wondering why Patton recruited him for touring in the first place (the gentleman’s name, sadly, passes these ears by). With bass and drums around him, the deckhand is fine; solo, his mistimed scratches grate irritatingly. Coupled with the unshakable feeling that lodges in the head and heart as early as four songs in – that this set really isn’t going down as one of its helmsman’s finest – this total lack of song-to-song adhesion enables the attention to wander. What am I missing on television for this…?

Once the mind’s in such a place, it’s never shifting from its comfort zone. Anything that’s not immediate – that doesn’t instantly get the toes tapping and the ears twitching – is disregarded; thus, a slew of songs slip and slide together to comprise energetic but mostly uninspired background noise to an evening’s light drinking. Lacking the bite of Tomahawk or Fantomas, Patton’s chosen vessel of the moment sinks with barely a tear shed.

Disappointing? On this hand, yes, but rest assured that the other hand loves it more than they do The Real Thing.

  • Peeping Tom 5 / 10

Bah...

Critics, schmitics.

they were piss poor

at Dour

lots of things are better than the real thing

let alone Patton's other works, The Real Thing is not great, it has about 4 good songs, and at best is an average album.

Hmmm

I too am not the biggest fan of the Peeping Tom album, but I knew what it was like before hand and thought it could be a bit of a laugh live (particularly due to the Patton input) and that's why I went. As you made clear in your review, you'd heard what the album was like beforehand, so I'm intruged by your sentence "towards the venue’s ample rear are content to catch fleeting moments of each song before returning to their social chatter.".

It feels like your presence was reluctant from the start. I would go to a Bell Orchestre gig and get pissed off that there were no vocals, since I'd have heard the album beforehand and would have known what to expect. Okay, so that's an extreme example, but although this wasn't the best gig I've ever been to, I figured after spending £18 odd on tickets, I might as well be on of "those at his feet, pressed against the barrier arms aloft, are clearly enthralled" and decide afterwards whether I had a good time or not.

I wasn't reluctant to attend, at all...

...but I felt uneasy with the experience early on. I felt no desire to get on down - whatever - as my loins remained unstirred.

Sorry.

people were there for Patton

as soon as he went off stage, people gave less of a shit - both visually and audibly

at a rahzel gig, the applause is euphoric after every skit, but at this it was almost reluctant

it's a fair review

You're probably right for most of the people

However, for me personally and I wonder if there were others, Patton was the original reason I listened to the band, I wasn't particularly impressed with the music but found it 2 dimensional enough that it might be fun live. I admit that although I found Rahzel's beatboxing impressive, and made my appreciation vocal as such, I found it more of a novelty than something that necessarily added to the show. I find that when an individual 'band' member has a solo moment that I'm usually cringing a little at it's evident lack of spontaneity and an expectation of the audience to worship it instantaneously even though it's not much more than a demonstration of skills.

I wasn't calling the quality of the review into question, it was an accurate snapshot of one persons opinion at a time and a place but I was trying to comment from a different perspective. I didn't want to write an entire review of my own, since I thought that most of the review summed it up well.

Don't apologise!

The review served it's purpose and was well delivered! If I'd really thought your review was bad then I wouldn't have replied since I wouldn't have thought it worth my time. I just wanted to add a little from a different perspective.

I saw them at latitude

they sounded like Linkin Park

I'm pretty much un-Patton-ed aside from having Suspended Animation (which is pretty good) and it didn't really make me wanna rush out and start worshipping him. Though he was rocking a white suit with trainers which impressed me.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon