Sign In:
Login with Facebook

The Kooks

Larrikin Love

Edit this event

So why should I really give a fuck if tonight's headline act have been given the odd push-coming-to-an-almighty-shove as far as pseudo gluts of recognition are concerned?

I suppose The Kooks' somewhat meteoric rise would be irrelevant if everyone operated on a level playing field, but of course they don't. So when Larrikin Love, that most uncontrived of eclectic entities, take the stage they're met with a mixture of nothingness and the odd chav exclaiming,_ "Spill my drink again and I'll twat you," _whilst enclaving his Burberry knight in a forefist engagement of safety and devotion. Or maybe that's the price you pay when the two worlds (and fanbases) of independent and mainstream music collide.

Still, Larrikin Love go on to play an awesome set, which is nothing less than anyone who's seen them before would expect. Consistency personified then, or business as usual.

So onto The Kooks.

It's difficult trying to fathom out the purpose of this band. I mean, we're all aware of the Melua historical triumphs and catastrophes, not to mention the mid-term sentence in Sylvia Young's bootcamp of prodigies and pressure-cookered vegetables of exceptionally expensive taste.

Whilst it has to be said they do possess some irrepressively infectious tunes - 'Eddie's Gun', 'She Moves In Her Own Way' and 'See The World' evoke memorories of such luminaries as Supergrass, The La's and Pulp past and present - there's also a potpourri of filler big enough to land a Chelsea Flower Show award for both scent-filled and mirkiest garden alike.

Y'see, the worrying thing is that everything flows just that little bit too smoothly, and there's hardly any time (or call) for improvisation, which can only lead to one implicit conclusion: that the indie Take That are upon us. Minus the tunes, and Lulu, of course. Sure enough, why should a propensity for pop music be reason to dampen the name of a successful act? Well it wouldn't, if it weren't for the fact that four songs into an hour-and-a-quarter long set I was bored to the point of chewing my own cheek linings and decided that a Subway Italian BMT was a better option than endearing myself to another minute of indie-lite drudgery. And to think that this time last year The Kooks seemed like a viable alternative to all things light and mellow. Oh, how wrong we can all be, sometimes...

  • The Kooks 5 / 10
  • Larrikin Love 7 / 10

Take That

had no filler. And they were a) much better looking, b) way better dancers and c) actually quite interesting. The Kooks do evoke memories of Supergrass, The La's and Pulp, but only in the same way that Travis evoke memories of Teenage Fanclub, Gigolo Aunts and The Posies being much, much better at the same thing.

there is not a single redeeming feature about the Kooks

Don't say Naive. Not true.

Good review

But what the HELL is the fifth paragraph going on about?

I guess

what I'm trying to say is that their non-musical conquests are better known than the titles of most of their songs!

Naive

...

Oh just great

I'm seeing this tonight at the Brighton Dome.
Whoopey-doo-da!

No you aren't

Its been cancelled :]

I didn't know about

the Sylvia Young thing.
Fill me in !!

I hate this band and need more reasons to tell people why I hate them.

I don't know how I feel about that

I went all the way to the Dome and then I found out. Bastards.

They were studying

performance art or whatever. Singer bloke went out with Katie Melua who was also studying there. Blahdy blahdy blah...

I really

vehemently dislike the Kooks. I like She Moves in Her Own Way, but I refuse to listen to it on moral grounds. I hate the lead singer, you see.
He needs his jaw broken, I think. Ha! I am so mean. But he looks/sounds like such an arrogant twat though.

i think thats a bit over the top

take all the reviews on the front page (or further if you like) and i bet theres more positive reviews than negative. the only problem here is Dom's poor taste in Subways

Dirk

A lot of bands have performance artschool related backgrounds, from the Rolling Stones onwards. The difference is a lot of them have taken some of that tutoring onboard to create something unique, or at least slightly interesting. The Kooks have at best half a dozen good songs. They are a good support band. They do not have enough material to warrant a 90 minute headline slot, regardless of their background, and that is the point.

I've never heard The Kooks

and the fact they've taken their name from an old Bowie tune (surely?) both intrigues and frightens me at the same time. Is it a clever homage or pretenious ballyhoo? By your review here, dom, it's obviously the latter. Still, if their cd finds its way into my local used bin...(ahem!) I may give 'em a go just cos -- I'm considering a similar stunt (using a Jet cd perhaps?!) as an audition for Jackass (the movie) 3.

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon