Sign In:
Login with Facebook

Editors

We Are Scientists and The Cloud Room

Edit this event

Support bands have it tough, don't they? Playing to ambivalent (and relatively sober) audiences isn't easy, but The Cloud Room do an admirable job of entertaining those who've bothered to turn up early enough to catch their set. What the American quartet lack in showmanship they more than make up for with bona-fide tunes; and in set closer 'Hey Now Now' they have the kind of indie anthem that's sure to have Jo Whiley foaming at the mouth before the year is out.

We Are Scientists have already been responsible for inducing several pints of dribble from FM radio DJs who should know better, and if their name is bad then their nondescript brand of emo tinged frat-rock is even worse. I'm not sure what's more offensive: the singer's nasal whining or the bass player's laughable moustache. Every so often a band comes along that leaves me shaking my head in a combination of disbelief and disdain. We Are Scientists? You are that band.

Tonight's headliners, on the other hand, have little trouble living up to the considerable hype surrounding them. Back in April, then relatively unknown, Editors couldn't fill the Zodiac's tiny downstairs room. Dismissed as the British Interpol, nobody seemed that interested. Fast forward six months, and a capacity crowd awaits their Oxford return.

Singer Tom Smith bounds on-stage, greets us repeatedly and proceeds to perform like a man possessed. Very much the focal point of Editors' icy post-punk assault, Smith jerks and twitches around the stage with the confidence you'd expect from a man who knows that his band are approaching the top of their game.

The recently repackaged 'Bullets' is dispatched just two songs into the set, and 'Blood' soon follows, but they could release at least half of debut album 'The Back Room' and get away with it. From the throbbing energy of 'Someone Says' to the foot stomping riffage of 'All Sparks', this Birmingham four-piece have ample material with which to continue their rapid assent, and in Smith they have a singer well equipped to deliver it. On this evidence, Editors might just be the real deal after all.

Photo by Gemma White

  • Editors 8 / 10
  • We Are Scientists 2 / 10
  • The Cloud Room 7 / 10

Editors

I was there, and enjoyed myself very much. I quite like We Are Scientists, nothing particularly original about them, but the majority of their songs are great pop-rock, and even better to be heard live. Editors were brilliant, they sounded bigger and better live, which I hope rids them of those 'British Interpol' comparisons. Either way, it was a great gig and I will definately try and see them again.

Re: Editors

stage. i think that's what they call it!

**runs for cover from shower of tomatoes**

Re: rob webb

I agree with you!

I saw both bands in Nottingham, W.A.S. were a great live band, lots of banter inbetween great GREAT songs!

Editors are the new Oasis. BORING people making BORING music for BORING people to hug each other and sing along to!

Re: rob webb

there's nothing like a bit of constructive criticism.

god, i love this job...

Re: Editors

Yeah, me and my friends cornered him for a chat, seemed a very nice guy. The bassist was at the merch stall at the end and was also equally chatty. The banter inbetween songs is always top quality with WAS. I genuinely think that the Editors lead singer is just a bid odd, full of nervous energy more than anything else that night, so God knows what he was like at the Astoria. Saw him walking out of the Zodiac arm in arm in Edith Bowman, can anyone help to explain that?

Editors

I thought The Cloud Room were horrible. Sorry.

Re: Editors

maybe that's why she was at cardiff barfly for their gonzo on tour thing.
wow, this review is turning into the Bizarre column in The Sun.

Re: Editors

Apparently, at that Gonzo thing in Cardiff, Zane Lowe tried to steal my friend's pint. And his DJing was awfull yn ol pob son.

.

id say the name is the best thing about we are scientists, being from a capn jazz song and all...

editors vs was

I've just bought both albums & there is quite a bit to commend both. WAS are a good laugh, don't take themselves too seriously & make me wanna throw myself around the room. Yeah, yeah originality complaints aside, they rock.
Editors - miserable, accesible - mood album, sometimes a dirge.
Well, there's my pennorthworth....

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon