Sign In:

The Subways

The Chalets and Tern

Edit this event

What Cambridge “punk grunge metallers” Tern need is a pantomime cow. In fact, all such competently polished yet plodding pub rock bands should be required by law to take a pantomime cow (preferably a riverdancing one) everywhere they go, in order to add a little amusement and excitement to their otherwise pedestrian acts. Not only would this dramatically increase the entertainment value of their sets but it would provide valuable bovine-based employment opportunities, thus boosting Britain’s economy and helping to stave off recession. Why has no one thought of this before? If we start the campaign now and build up a decent level of media coverage and public support, the next Parliamentary Season could see the Pantomime Cow Act of 2006 on the statute books! Are you with me, brethren?

In the absence of riverdancing cows, and until the world catches up with thinking so radically ahead of its time, we do at least have the utterly fucking fantastic Chalets, who I want to see again. And again and again and again, and then some more after that. The Chalets make lightning-strike pop songs full of fizz and fun and rock‘n’roll impact. They have a glockenspiel, a keyboard, a synth, thundering bass lines and boy-girl-girl-boy vocals. They do arm-waving dance routines and swap instruments a lot and they wear leopardprint dresses. They have come to save you from your dayjob, your council tax and weekly food shop, rescuing you from all things grey and dull and make you dance like you haven’t a care in the world. They make me grin and bounce around and rant ecstatic monologues at my equally charmed gig-mates. They make me very, very happy. Hell yeah, Motherfucker. They have more gigs booked. Go see them.

After such a stellar display of effervescent pop glory, it’s possible that anything would have seemed the anticlimax that The Subways turned out to be. Then again, it’s quite possible that The Subways would have been a bit of a letdown anyway; they’d have washed right over me even if the Worst Band In The World had been on before them. It’s not that they’re bad though - far from it. Singer Billy is suitably earnest and the drummer bangs away to good effect, neither of them noticeably put out by the inevitability of every reviewer all but ignoring their best efforts in order to spend more time dwelling on the very pretty poses thrown by bassist Mary-Charlotte. They do the garage rock thing, and they’re good at it. Which is possibly exactly the point - garage rock by numbers, predictable stuff following a template and just shrieking SCENE. As in “Hey, kids, dig our cool and groovy right-now scenester vibe! We are where it’s at, we are the Beautiful People!” Which isn’t really something that inspires much devotion from me. Ho hum. Still, I’d go and see them again if The Chalets were supporting. That said, if The Chalets were on the bill I’d almost be tempted to go and see the StereoFuckingPhonics. Assuming, that is, that I could bring a couple of Michael Flatley-wannabes and a cow costume…

The Subways

Subways are just plain old bland plop.

Re: The Subways

The Chalets, though, are TOP.

The Subways

I was at this too and i agree whole heartedly that id go and see the subways again if it meant i could see the chalets.

The chalets were awesome, although no kiss chasing, which is a shame as thats probably my favourite song on nightrocker.
Apparently they're not very good at playing it live, according to the guitarist.

The subways however were meh. And in love with their phaser it appears.

The Subways

Spot on about The Subways
I read in 'Metro' the gossip paper of the bus, that these "guys"(sic) were Britains best hope this year, i just thought wwwwhahhhhhaaaaattttttt??!

Re: The Subways

ha the Metro, its wierd how everyone reads that in the morning isnt it? The free paper that has crept into everybodies lives, manipulating their little brains into thinking WHATEVER THEY WANT THEM TO! Oh my god, its the whole 1984 thing again, blah blah etc etc

Anyway, the only good thing about the Subways is that he plays an SG, perhaps the most underated of 'guitars'.

Re: The Subways

I BLOODY LOVE THE CHALETS

and have considerably less love for the subways.

Re: The Subways

Right on. Even the video has an appropriately bland colouration.

Re: The Subways

SGs are cool. Don't read Metro. Its evil. Its printed by the same people as the Standard. Its a bloody tory sheet!

Re: The Subways

chalets = several shades of smashingness. grrrrrreat.

Re: The Subways

"Its printed by the same people as the Standard"

You mean the Daily Mail?

I can't stand the mail/metro or standard. Mail has an article on imigration EVERY DAY, and how our streets are unsafe. Funny when you meet people who read that, they're all closet racists and paranoid wrecks. Shocking.

Metro is evil genius though. People will allways read it because its free, so they can put what they like and run no risk of people not reading it.

I don't EVER pick it up in the morning anymore.

Re: The Subways

P.S. Subways = poop, Chalets = great.

Re: The Subways

I always get it, when they have it at Finsbury Park (which is about two days a week).

Yeah, it's shit, but it lasts me til Knightsbridge at least.

Re: The Subways

I used to get it most days to keep me occupied on the train, now I just can't be bothered. Plus I feel like I'm giving them money by my eyes seeing the adverts.

Now I just listen to music on the train and stare out of the window in a shoegazery fasion, looking at the desolate wasteland that is south london...

Re: The Subways

There's not a lot to stare at on the Piccadilly Line.
I would stare at the girl opposite, but she already thinks I'm weird.

Re: The Subways

Yeah that's what's not so great about the tube, where do you stare? I don't want to be a sucker by giving advertisments my attention.

Overground still blows though. I'd sooner get the underground any day.

The Subways

I like Tern

Re: The Subways

Not underated byfukin Angus... whah!

Add your comment

Reply


 or Abandon