Sign In:

Italics, bold, emoticons.

I don't know how to use italics or bold lettering on this forum, and I don't want to know; neither do I know how to use those stupid "emoticons".

Occasionally it is necessary when writing to be able to use italics or bold lettering, but only in brief documents, usually of a business or legal nature.

In normal prose, whether that be an essay, a report or a letter (and that includes forum contributions), italics and bold lettering should not be used. Their use is symptomatic of laziness; the use indicates that the writer is incapable of expressing a view using language and has to resort to an idiot's aid to expression.

The argument for emoticons is that they allow the writer to highlight an emotion expressed in a piece of prose that may not be readily apparent to the reader; this particularly applies to irony. However, again, better use of language would make the use of emoticons redundant.

Other lazy effects include the use of capital letters to imply shouting, (there exists the exclamation mark), elongated words with repetitions of letters to imply emphasis usually accompanied by irritation, injectives, (an injective is an involuntary part of speech and should never be used except in quoted dialogue), and over-use of onomatopoeia.
Share Tweet This
View NestedLinear
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    YOUR just jealous

    waaannnnkkererer!!!
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    WHY DO YOU CARE SO MUCH? :-O IS IT BECAUSE YOU HAVE A TINY PENIS? ;-)
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    you should write a book.

    "A Lesson A Day", by JD Traynor. i can see it now.

    :)
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    I suppose Mr Traynor, you’ll be objecting my favourite misuse of punctuation* next?!

    (*?! as illustrated in the sentence above)

    ;-)
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    I mostly agree with you, mr traynor. However, I try not to be this pedantic about it.

    And for me, personally, though I abhor its usage...I use emoticons periodically myself. The reason I do this is to re-emphasize that I'm joking, I'm being sarcastic etc.

    I used to hang out on another site for a time. We were fairly familar with one another but still with the anonymity the internet provides. So I'd say, "show me yer tits" or something lewd like that thinking it's a joke, right? We're 8000 miles apart, we've never met, never gonna met (probably), and I couldn't possibly be seriously. Well, without the little emoticons this little group (some anyway) found li'l old me offensive. And I could only apologize so much before I found it more expedient for all involved to just say, Later! (This group by the way, makes DiS look like sensative pussies. So go figure yer humble ORain became the object of their wrath. But ultimately I had to say, Thanks, Fuck You & Good-bye.)

    BTW, Billy Corgan uses emoticons. Wanker! ;-)
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    Believe it or not the internet is actually used for casual conversations, more so than considered pieces of prose.

    You don't really seem to have grasped the idea of using language appropriate to the medium, do you. The message board isn't an essay-writing contest, it's a conversational medium. The less serious the conversation the less appropriate it is to write like a particularly pompous english teacher.

    I'll agree with you on bold text though, usually looks a bit naff.
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    Language is evolving, Traynor, like it or not.
    You don't ever really manage any graduation in tone in your posting you know, even with this incredible command of language you seem to congratulate yourself with.
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    Emoticons (in text) and italics are an invaluable way of adding conversational inflections to posts. Using them allows for the meanings conveyed by tone of voice, body language and so on to come through in what you write. I cannot even begin to see what your problem is with that.
    • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

      "Emoticons (in text) and italics are an invaluable way of adding conversational inflections to posts. "

      This is a forum, not a chat room. It is for discussion, not for conversation.
      • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

        Excuse me but this is NOT YOUR FORUM. You don't get to say what it is and isn't for, you twat. I made it and I say you're WRONG. It's for both discussion and conversation, as should be entirely clear from reading the description of the Social board.

        Troll.
        • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

          "Troll". Not true.

          By the way, what's your favourite dancehall artist?
          • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

            Well sorry but anyone who posts condescending little diatribes every day or two, and then proceeds to tell staff what their message board should and shouldn't be used for, is a troll in my books.

            As for dancehall I'm just starting to get into it at the moment, hence asking for suggestions the other day. so mostly fairly obvious stuff that you'd probably slag off. Beenie man, vybz kartel, macka diamond, some more grimey/garage crossover stuff too. Am looking for older stuff too though, have been told to get some soul jazz compilations.
            • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

              Not sure why I'm bothering to tell you that either, I'm sure it's just a lead-in to you having another tangential dig at me about something
            • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

              It seems to be a common practive of your's to downgrade descriptions that imply the person who is being described is offensive. Elsewhere you tried to downgrade the word "snob". Anyone who is racist, a snob, a troll, etc. is offensive. If you expand any such definition and make that definition more general then to be called such a name is not as strong a statement as it should be. Hence, being a racist, or snob, or troll is not as bad as it should be. Downgrading these definitions is a political decision designed to lessen the offensiveness of the quality of being racist etc.

              The Soul Jazz compilations are a good idea.
              • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

                Well seeing as you apparently weren't even aware what a troll was a few days ago I don't think you're really best placed to accuse me of abusing some definition. It's not something that even has much of an official definition, although here's an attempt (also quite broad):

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
                'people who affect a deliberately inflammatory persona in order to provoke a vehement response from other users.'

                Really it's just something whose usage you get a clear feel for if you spend time on message boards. In your case I think most would agree with me. Most of the threads you start appear to be aimed at winding people up and patronising people. If you don't intend to wind people up then why do you use patronising language? there's no need for it otherwise.
  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    i think traynor teaches open university
    • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

      Actually, god, yeah, with the old ";-)" it would be really hard to do sarcastic jokes and be sure the other person wouldn't take offence.
      • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

        If you don't want to know....why ask?
        Why bother to write yet another long, preachy and boring post?
        • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

          Your a sad laughable figure aren't you Traylor?
          • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

            You really are a dick face arent you?

            Just stiring things up on purpose, about using italics and bold, you must be a very brave boy.
            • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

              the thing i find most offensive about this kind of argument, is the suggestion that those without a superb command of english should really keep their thoughts to themselves. at least, until they've learnt to articulate those thoughts better.

              not all of us have enjoyed the benefits of a top flight education. not all of us have an enormous vocabulary. hell, some of us may even be dyslexic. does this negate our opinions and experiences?

              i'm more interested in the ideas behind someone's post. and in the intent of their words.

              the most beautifully written words can still, ultimately, mean nothing.

              by belittling those who are not able to articulate themselves as well as perhaps you might like, then is there not a risk that the most marginalised in society are just marginalised further.

              the educated middle classes have always had a voice. more to the point, they've always had the confidence to make that voice heard.

              i'd rather open my ears, and my mind, and hear what everyone else has to say.

              • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

                "by belittling those who are not able to articulate themselves as well as perhaps you might like, then is there not a risk that the most marginalised in society are just marginalised further. "

                That is certainly true, I have no disagreement with that. But, a lot of the modern use of language is not due to a lack of education.

                "the educated middle classes " Why not just say the "educated". Are you drawing an analogy between coming from a working-class background and lack of education?
                • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

                  Some cunt always has to bring 'class' into discussions on here. Pisses me off.
                • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

                  fair point john. i should have just said the 'educated', rather than bring class into it. and no, i'm not saying working class people have a lack of education, but more often than not, we (i'm from a w/c background by the way. have m/c job now) certainly have a poorer quality of education than our middle class counterparts.

                  i'll admit, as someone who had frankly fucking awful education (till the age of 16 anyway. my senior school was an inner city dump, badly funded, run by demoralised staff who primed you for a life flipping burgers etc) i'm probably a bit knee-jerk on the class thing, so i apologise for that.

  • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

    you fuckwit
    how is use of exclamation marks in any way less a crime against the use of language than italics or suchlike?
    and no, you cant express irony using just language, without completely altering the effect.

    and the use of, like, injectives is a thing called characterisation.
    tit.
    • Re: Italics, bold, emoticons.

      More from me. I think matt brought up this point, about this medium being conversational in nature. And as such it makes it difficult to express oneself in certain situations.

      In a fiction novel the author might be able use "blah,blah,blah," he exclaimed, he said sarcastically, he said -however -- to convey the emotion behind the words. Likewise, I'd be a right arse if I started talking in the third person, or if I used "I say with irony," instead of the simple winky. Plus, ain't my posts long enough already! ;-)

      As for injectives. Well, sometimes they're even OK in a writer's narration, certainly. As are incomplete sentences and so on. I'd caution some of yous however, that for the best results whenever breaking the standard rules, is to know the rules (me included). I think Mark Twain said that about James Fenimore Cooper before he blasted his Mohicans novel. But I digress.

      I've said this before and no doubt will say it again. On the whole, the group of kids here would make any parent proud. Besides having generally outstanding taste in music - which is foremost of course! - these young (and old too) DiSers are the brightest, most articulate group of rag-tag hooligans I've ever had the pleasure.

Thread not appearing correctly? Click here to rebuild | Report this