Prague, Copenhagen, Vienna, Stockholm, Budapest, Washington DC, Canberra, Wellington, Ottawa aren't anywhere near as grimy.
Yes, some of those were purpose built capitals, others are comparatively recent settlements, but they're all > London in the grime stakes.
yeah but if you just got off the boat
had a look at trafalgar square and took a wonder down the south bank you'd probably say the same about london.
get to zone 2 however and boom! filth town
I don't know that much about city sizes,
but I'm guessing not one of them is even half as big as London.
Well, they're all way bigger than Portsmouth
...which is a grimy shithole.
bits are
bits aren't
Pretty much
mehhhhhhh...
...It's sort of like finding dusty paperclips under a cupboard.
Maybe a couple of bouncy balls aswell...and plastic army men.
Yeah.
Yes
it's a dirty whore
La Paz is filthy
South London is Eden.
not compared to Rome.
Festering dusthole.
Its just dirty because its so transitory
no one really cares about where they live as they won't be there for long. That's how I read it. Or its a 'cultural' thing. Or its because no one has any 'self respect' BUT show their dogs/cars/trainers respect or you is fucking knifed YEAH OK?
it's just dirty
because it's got so many people and there's never a quiet time.
Muswell Hill is clean. Central London is non-stop litter production filth. Also bus-dust settles on everything.
Unavoidably grubby.
It's dirty because no one ever gives it a good hoover.
If Camden was cleaned by a crack cleaning squad for a year and a day
it would still be dirty. It is the grimiest place in the world.
Yeah, pretty much.
I went to Manchester last weekend though, and was suprised at how dirty it was. Nottingham's pretty clean in comparison.
yes
and no.
depends
yep
as much i love certain aspects of london, whenever i go down i end up with the dirtiest, greasiest hair and face.
yes pretty much
my nails are always dirty
do you scrabble around in the dirt?
Constantly,
like some sort of rodent
?
? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????????, ????? ???? ????????? ? ??????, ? ?? ?????? ?????, ??????????????, ?? ???.
well next time
try swallowing
like most other capital cities.
That's not true though.........
Prague, Copenhagen, Vienna, Stockholm, Budapest, Washington DC, Canberra, Wellington, Ottawa aren't anywhere near as grimy.
Yes, some of those were purpose built capitals, others are comparatively recent settlements, but they're all > London in the grime stakes.
yeah but if you just got off the boat
had a look at trafalgar square and took a wonder down the south bank you'd probably say the same about london.
get to zone 2 however and boom! filth town
I don't know that much about city sizes,
but I'm guessing not one of them is even half as big as London.
Well, they're all way bigger than Portsmouth
...which is a grimy shithole.
bits are
bits aren't
Pretty much
mehhhhhhh...
...It's sort of like finding dusty paperclips under a cupboard.
Maybe a couple of bouncy balls aswell...and plastic army men.
Yeah.
Yes
it's a dirty whore
La Paz is filthy
South London is Eden.
not compared to Rome.
Festering dusthole.
Its just dirty because its so transitory
no one really cares about where they live as they won't be there for long. That's how I read it. Or its a 'cultural' thing. Or its because no one has any 'self respect' BUT show their dogs/cars/trainers respect or you is fucking knifed YEAH OK?
it's just dirty
because it's got so many people and there's never a quiet time.
Muswell Hill is clean. Central London is non-stop litter production filth. Also bus-dust settles on everything.
Unavoidably grubby.
It's dirty because no one ever gives it a good hoover.
If Camden was cleaned by a crack cleaning squad for a year and a day
it would still be dirty. It is the grimiest place in the world.
Yeah, pretty much.
I went to Manchester last weekend though, and was suprised at how dirty it was. Nottingham's pretty clean in comparison.