i was actually talking rubbish there. i base it on how the album is presented. if it's stylistically one whole i'll tag it as such (like Mellon Collie by the Pumpkins or Being There by Wilco) but if it's two albums packaged together I'll put them seperately.

so that its divided into shmap'n shmazz and the rest. just because.

actually fuck it - i was going to try and defend last fm and point out that it's less useful if people have stuff badly tagged but this is current right near the top of my recommendations:

http://www.last.fm/music/Jenny%2BLewis%2B%2526%2BThe%2BWatson%2BTwins

YEAH GOOD ONE

order. i have lists of stuff that ive recently got so i remember to listen to them, and a system of ticks. ill stop talking now :)

and it is seriously getting me down :(

is what it's called on the actual album tracklisting on the back of the cd.

me not caring about listening to Santana 53 times has nothing to do with my interest in last.fm as a subject. And if you hadn't already noticed, i post in every thread i have any vague knowledge/interest in. It's one of the bonuses of having no life

I think that last.fm is, on the whole, a negative influence. The recommendations/gig calendar mean nothing to me, and since quitting it (due to technological incapabilities) i've felt a lot more free in my music playing. I still listen to the same stuff, but there isn't the thought in the back of my head about "how will my charts will look if i listen to this album again?". Also, endless cred-grabbing lists piss me off - who is "the last.fm chart" for, really? Other people? Fuck other people

So, am i allowed to have an opinion and express it? Maybe i should be more WACKY

1 Bright Eyes 18829
2 Band i really liked when i was 15, but who are actually rubbish 224
3 More wimpy indie nonsense 116