Drowned in Sound

Search



should abortion be legal or illegal?

no votes
?
by hedgehog

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk6t_tdOkwo

a video showing how truly ignorant some people are on the matter^

hedgehog | 31 Jul '07, 23:25 | Send note | Report this | Reply

also

what are everyone elses opinions?


CAN OF WORMS.

STAND BACK.


legal

but with the necessary safeguards to ensure it doesn't encourage irresponsible procreation and possibly with some way of incorporating the father's wishes into the process more...


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Agree with what you say about irresponsible procreation. Apparently in some western european countries, abortion is seen as a type of contraception, some women have had up to 30 abortions. I think it should be legal, but we can't let it get to that point, people need to know about proper contraception.


^^

bullshit.

you can;t have it both ways


when a father isn't responsible for 50% of a child's genetic makeup

I'll agree that he ought to have no say in whether it exists or not. I'm not saying the father ought to have equal rights to the mother, obviously you can't force a woman to have an abortion, but they ought to have more say.


yes

and the penalty should be death


I've pretty much stated

my opinion on Abortion.

But since I have no right to force my opinion on anyone else, it should be legal.


my friends sent me the video

I thought I might as well share it with DiS.


it is pretty ridiculous that

they would spend so much time campaigning on that without actually having thought about such obvious practicalities, but i think most abortionists think that its doctors who should be punished for illegal abortions, so its not as jarring as it seems, hes just asked pretty stupid people


I cannot believe the last woman

she wouldn't even state her own thoughts on it and when the man asking her the questions had totally clamped her she just claimed god had "brought her" there to campaign, and then she said goodbye and sent them away, jesus.


^ pretty much this

i'm guessing their legal beliefs are all based around punishing the doctors, and so leaving women with no chance of having it done in the first place


Personally I think it should be legal

What exactly is the ruling on abortion in the UK? Is it only legal under certain circumstances?


really?

what are the conditions?


You can't do it after a certain period

Third Trimester maybe?


Also

you have to get two doctors to agree.


oh well I knew that

I thought you meant like depending on the amount of times you had had one or something.


yes

it's the time period


Legal

For moral reasons.


Kind of.

I find it to be pretty horrifying really.


I should have said

not where the mothers life is endanger or she was raped etc


well surely no matter what the circumstances

it's still the same procedure and should be viewed in the same way?


Not really

You can kill people under certain circumstances and not be charged with murder.


but surely it would sitll be classed as murder regardless?

even if they weren't charged?


No

Self-Defence etc


hm

well then surely jsut killing someone in cold blood should be viewed as murder?

in which case an abortion would only be murder if the mother was doing it for some sort of kick, as opposed to just not wanting a child?


I think we've got confused

I don't think the because the basic prodecure is the same, that circumstances should be regarded as unimportant.

I find it hard to accept that someone should be able to have an abortion because they feel that a baby would impinge upon their life too much.

If they had a baby and decided a week in that life was too hard they cannot legally kill the child. I don't really see why there should be a distinction made between an unborn baby and a baby.


well, for me, I don't view an embryo or developing foetus as a person

so I don't see it the same as killing a child after one week of life.


But why not?

I concede that a foetus after a week or two isn't recognisable as a human.

But after 12 weeks?

This is pretty much the fundamental issue. I just don't see why the fact that a baby is in the womb should render it as somehow less human.


you don't feel particularly connected with something just growing inside you

and it hasn't developed into a proper being. If your child was born, you develop a connection with it, or at least moreso than you would when it was simply developing inside you, you see it as a person when it's born, not before. (at least I don't)


Define

'proper being'

a baby cannot communicate in any more than the most basic ways, it can't take care of itself.

Also science has shown pretty conclusively that unborn babies can feel pain, can be influence by outside factors.

I just don't buy the whole birth is the most important idea


ach I just don't see something that is developing inside someone

as a proper being, even though a baby cannot survive by itself once born, it's now become it's own being, it's not connected to it's mother in the same way, yes it still relies on her/ the father to live, but not in the same way.


because

while it is inside of you it is still part of you and connected to you.


Connected: Yes

A part of you? No.


so

it is not a fully fledged human being.


i don't think of it like that

I can understand why people would, obviously, but I think it's blown out of proportion and that it really shouldn't be viewed that way.


I know a couple of girls

that have had abortions,and really, its not the life-altering/destroying decision that many people make it out to be


As much as

sneaking up behind someone with no friends or family and shooting them in the back of head is murder.


so...

not at all then


No, quite a lot

But I think deciding whether something is or isn't murder completely misses the moral issue.


If your baba is chris_is_cool then it should be manditory

if not, it's up to you, you fat cunt.;


:D :D :D :D


I don't think it's right..

but I don't think it should be made illegal. If people want to, and they have their own rational defence, then they can do what they like.

I wouldn't encourage it myself though, if you don't want a child, put it up for adoption, don't abort it...


you really think a life of having been neglected by your parents

and going through an orphanage is better that maybe just not having a child at all? I realise the child could lead a fulfilling life if it was born, but no one can know.


realise the first sentence there is a bit emssed up

but I hope you understand what I mean anyway.


oi! hedgy!

i put my view in the other thread


I know, I saw.

hedgy? oh dear god.

sorry, should I finish that and not leave god hanging again? :|


nah leave him be

hedgy...lol..it sounds cute.


no, we'll leave it at cute

otherwise i have this horrid image of you with patches of hair.


hey you put the image in there

you get rid of it by calling me something better!


can't you just view me as something

you wouldn't link to the word "hedgy" ?


naked

no, that wouldn't work either....

haha! im only messing!!

omg i'm laughing out loud!!! ha ha ah!!


haha oh dear

it's been a while since we have had a good ole banter lydon....:-)


this is good ole banter?

I'm being scared and you're laughing :(


oh :-(

well i thought it was just a little bit of fun.


ok then

I'm not TOTALLY scared, that should make it more fun.


It's a tricky one,

but I think a child should at least get a chance to be brought up by people who actually care about them, rather then not have a life.


there are many

who are left unwanted though and end up being abused by the system. If abortion was illegal you'd have even more children left in care which i imagine would be pretty shitty.


But this doesn't mean we

should assume non-existence is a better fate than that.


I think it should be up to the parent to decide what's best for their unborn child

I don't think it should be up to others to say "Yes it should be illegal for a woman to make this decision" why should they be able to remove this right for someone to decide for themselves?


Because

it isn't just affecting them.

I believe that an unborn baby is just as much entitled to have their rights and needs taken into account.


but it will effect them most in the long run

I don't think every person should give birth to a child if they become pregnant just so that child can live and make decisions itself later, if a person feels they do not want to become a pregant I don't see why they should stay that way just because others believe they should.


and we go round in circles

I could easily say why should someone be killed just because someone decided they don't want to be inconvenienced.

Obviously that is THE most black and white situation and I know any situation is much more complicated than that.

I believe in Libertarianism. If someone is not affected others then I think they should be able to live their life as they see fit.

But in this circumstance they are affecting someone else.


we are always affecting others

by every decision we ever make. I'm not sure where this vacuum, that libertarians think that humans can live in, exists.


but up there

you said its alright in certain circumstances like if she was raped, you cant make exceptions like that as that child has just as much rights as a child born accidentally to a married couple.


But that

is something that could well have a profound traumatic effect on the mother.

and in that case I think her rights are more important.

Same with her life being endangered.


but surely that depends on the person

a mother who isnt allwed to have an abortion might suffer from the same amount of trauma, theres no way of measuring it. So to say its right for one person and not for the other isnt really fair.


It's basically wherever you draw the line

there is an argument to be made that since the west values human life to the degree it does, why should any mental trauma take precedence over an actual life?

I don't really believe that myself, but I can see the reasoning behind the argument.


I think abortion should be viwed int he same way

with the exception of people just using abortion as some sort of contraception, ie. carelessly having sex so often they need to have many abortions, aside from that, I don't think one person you should have priority over another when they are choosing something like this.


Also

I think that if abortion was illegal, it wouldn't stop people from getting them, and then they would just be getting them in unsafe, dirty environments. I know this sounds illogical,but I would rather see them safe and get an abortion than die trying to get an illegal abortion.


if it was made illegal

which, in some places it is. women would have to resort to extreme and unsafe measures to have an abortion or would simply have to have a child they may end up resenting, not loving. where is the use in that?