Home / News /
Klaxon 5: from the charts, to your hearts
Posted: 16 Jan '07, 11:32
Klaxons look set for Sunday
I love Klaxons. I love them more than I probably should, and have spent the last five days listening to little else. Good news arrived at DiS today in the form of early indications that point towards new single 'Golden Skans' climbing into the top ten this week, on downloads alone. The band achieved number 16 on Sunday based on iTunes downloads alone.
Looking to join the band in the top flight are The View, Jamie T (awesome, times two) and the world's worst person, Mika.
Perhaps more interesting, though, are reports that following a particularly rousing rendition on Mika's favourite programme Celebrity Big Brother, 'I Want You Back' by The Jackson 5 is climbing rapidly.
In what looks set to be the first older catalogue track (it was released in 1969, reaching number two in the UK and the top spot in the US) to truly benefit from TV exposure, if reports are true, this could be where the face of the chart is truly altered forever and the songs played on Radio 1 on a Sunday are more about people's tastes, a nation's mood swings, and the adverts they're watching (iTunes reports a growth in sales of The Gossip's 'Standing in the Way of Control' this week, too; the song features on a Channel 4 advert for new show Skins).
Interesting times for sure, but also depressing for anyone, like me, who would rather cry tears filled with acid than listen to Mika.
Additional factoid: last week's top 40, unveiled on 14th January, featured only ten artists not signed to a Universal-distributed label. DiScuss?
-
Hmm
I can't see how Mika is much worse than Jamie T to be honest.
-
Mika - this year's Anthony and the Wankstains.
Jamie T - this year's 'breakthrough' cockney crap that gets one top 40 hit then fucks off.
The Gossip's album version of Standing In The Way Of Control is crap. Its slow and lasts for about 10 minutes.
-
why are you all so wrong :(
Mika is amazing, Jamie T is alright and has had 3 top 40 singles already, and Klaxons are shite.
you said in november that Mika was great on Jools Holland wrighty, WHAT CHANGED. did he get all popular!
-
Mika was absolutely WELL GOOD on Jools Holland.
Just him and his piano.
But I heard the recorded version and it had a band behind it. I think live, it looked like a really entertaining show to watch.
On record though, I don't think it'll work.
As for the wankstains comparison, he's better than them. They only got famous because 'Anthony' had about nine cocks or something.
-
Different Taste
I don't understand why people argue on these shits about weho's shite and who's not. None of you are really right, it's all just matters of opinion. I personally think Klaxons sound pretty good, other people may disagree, if we all liked the same things life would be a bit boring, and i suppose we wouldn't have nothing to argue about :)
-
no
he simply got shit beyond words or recognition. i dont even know why im saying "got" shit, he just is ,times 1000
-
-
-
-
The Unbearable Brilliance of Klaxons
Klaxons are a far more important band than The View or Jamie T can ever hope to be. Based on the incredible strength and consistency of their singles so far (the best run of classic pop songs since The Beatles), "Myths of the Near Future" is shaping up to be the "pet Sounds" of its generation.
-
.
is this post for real?
-
I hope so
-
-
that dude is high!
pet sounds of our generation?
fuck you! im all for opinions, but PLEEEASE. a beatles and pet sounds comparison for a band who this time in 2 years will be gone? bullshit. dont get me wrong, i like klaxons, and will happily dance my ass off to them in whatever shitty indie disco i find myself in, but DUDE....come on!
-
ANNIE LENNOX
ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX ANNIE LENNOX
-
Well...
Obviously comparing anything to such holy sacred cows as the Beatles and the Beach Boys is fairly provocative (consider it a converstaion stater than an informed critical response), but I think it has some essence to it - the Beatles, especially towards the beginning of their career (where Klaxons currently are), created accessible, brilliant, life-affirming, but essentially disposable pop songs, in just the same way that Klaxons do. It's all a matter of perspective. "Penny Lane" is either a feelgood little ditty with no real substance, or an incisive piece of man-in-the-street poetic songwriting, depending on your own opinion or the opinion of whoever you choose to listen to. I can imagine Klaxons producing a record that would be listened to in thirty years time. But obviously, only time will tell. If "Myths of the Near Future" is a disappointing pile of crap, I'll be the first disillusioned sucker to admit it. But why not have a little faith in contemporary music? I'd rather do that than be the cynical malcontent who refuses to like anything.
-
The only comparisons I would ever attempt to draw
Would be the hysteria shown by their fans at gigs. The first time I went to see the Klaxons the atmosphere could be described as just totally hysteric.
-
-
-
How do you know
they will be gone in 2 years?
Do you have some kind of machine, perhaps powered by hamsters?
-
-
-
-
-
Hang on
Did somebody just call The View 'awesome'?
-
No, it reference to Jamie T
which is he, he will mature and has far more lifespan. The comparison to Lily Allen are lazy, for starters he plays an instrument, such a short-sighted view that if someone comes from a particular place, they are the same.
He writes songs which are relevant to our times with a lot more gusto than most. He's a character whose more like to produce stuff from norm.
-
Yes I did
-
-
JT
"He writes songs which are relevant to our times with a lot more gusto than most"
and then goes and ruins it all by singing them as well.
-
JT?
For a minute there I was thinking you were talking about Justin Trousersnake and was highly confused.
-
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article